- Moderator
- #1,276
Unfortunately some people would almost rather someone fail so that they're proved correct rather than have their assessment of a player contradicted and it benefit the team. The bloke has done everything right since his position change (my guess is that a hard conversation was had and he was given a month to prove himself in his preferred position). Need to reward that and give him a shot.
At worst, we give a serviceable player a send off game. At best, we unearth a 25 year old mid with a new lease on their game.
In fairness I don't think HOF is one of those people though. I was more commenting on any player having the opportunity to redeem their career based on performance. Think HOF was focusing on more on the odds of Nathan actually achieving that.