A Kennedy Concern.

[Silvagnis]

Isn't it funny how you failed to mention this on the first night you responded to this thread. Instead you come back three days later to bring it up

Does it matter what I mentioned the first time I responded?

You're still wrong!

I had just watched part of the game for the first time and what I saw warranted another rebuke.

I dont blame you, infact, I dont even remember it happening (Kennedy running down Fixeter/Rischitelli).

IIRC it happened in the first quarter and before Murphy's injury.

I don't know an intelligent person could say he is slow and sluggish after an impressive effort(for a bigman) to nearly catch Rischitelli right after he had planted Fixter's head in the turf.

Sounds like someone took notes while watching the replay merely to come back to reply to me ... this just makes you look extra defensive now

(ps. Ive seen worse threads than this)

Get your hand off it!

You should have thought this thread through before saying your concerned about an underdone 18 year old who gets about five minutes to impress.

 

[Fanatico]

Does it matter what I mentioned the first time I responded?

You're still wrong!

I had just watched part of the game for the first time and what I saw warranted another rebuke.

IIRC it happened in the first quarter and before Murphy's injury.

I don't know an intelligent person could say he is slow and sluggish after an impressive effort(for a bigman) to nearly catch Rischitelli right after he had planted Fixter's head in the turf.

Get your hand off it!

You should have thought this thread through before saying your concerned about an underdone 18 year old who gets about five minutes to impress.

nahh see thats where your wrong you should really read the opening of the thread before you inherrited your sarcasm, what do you mean 5 minutes to impress hes played longer then 5 minutes i believe, another stupid remark yove made. better luck next time .....Cypher

 

[Fanatico]

I agree..

You should because there awful, maybe this draft you will find some better players, hell they may even replace them.

 

[Fanatico]

Because Kennedy has played less than half a dozen games with an injury interrupted pre-season and he injured a knee only 2 weeks ago.

So how can you say he's slow and sluggish when he hasn't even reached peak fitness?

I guess the draft isn't about tomorrow but yesterday and he's already a concern!

He is only eighteen playing off the bench for a crap side and you're expecting to see a superstar.

we have only said that he is sluggish we did not say he should be a superstar if you read the post propely it stated concern!! did not say lets leave him on the bench just said concern. well goodnight cypher

 

[Fanatico]

I dont know about worst thread ever. This nut job 14 year old is pretty entertaining.

well thats a great contribution to the thread.

 

[Fanatico]

yep that was the point can't you read murphy is weak he never has a go back never sticks up for himself he's a little bitc h and josh kennedy is a dud needs about another 5 years before he'll learn how not to kick a clanger and kick goals hahahaa

and its ok dont cry we no u dont have a mum your she had to kill herself when she saw you

Yeah im sure she had to kill herself because her son was a carlton supporter, because your mum was a collingwood supporter she was so ugly that prince charming even refused to kiss her, he spent the rest of his life living as a frog.
-night night

 

[Nightwolf]

You should because there awful, maybe this draft you will find some better players, hell they may even replace them.

Oh dear..

 

[Silvagnis]

nahh see thats where your wrong you should really read the opening of the thread before you inherrited your sarcasm, what do you mean 5 minutes to impress hes played longer then 5 minutes i believe, another stupid remark yove made. better luck next time .....Cypher

The opening line was

at first i was concerned about the big fella's kicking, and tonight im concerned over his pace and awareness during the Brisbane game.

So you're the one who isn't very bright because that is what my post was addressing.

Only a fool would be concerned at this point in Kennedy's career and you're not a good judge of talent or pace.

we have only said that he is sluggish we did not say he should be a superstar if you read the post propely it stated concern!! did not say lets leave him on the bench just said concern. well goodnight cypher

Since you used the term we are you and C4 a couple?

You're both fools for defending your comments and this is a **** thread.

 

[Philhawk]

nahh see thats where your wrong you should really read the opening of the thread before you inherrited your sarcasm, what do you mean 5 minutes to impress hes played longer then 5 minutes i believe, another stupid remark yove made. better luck next time .....Cypher

Let me introduce you to something ------------> .

Anyhow, in regards to Kennedy, he seems to be very comfortable up forward and his kicking looks to be generally good. I'm not sure whether you can judge "awareness" considering he is in his debut season?

You should because there awful, maybe this draft you will find some better players, hell they may even replace them.

I really want to, but I shouldn't.

 

[Fanatico]

Let me introduce you to something ------------> .

Anyhow, in regards to Kennedy, he seems to be very comfortable up forward and his kicking looks to be generally good. I'm not sure whether you can judge "awareness" considering he is in his debut season?



I really want to, but I shouldn't.

hahaha i dont think i was reffering to you but since youve chosen to jump in anyway you should really thing before you type, because what the He** makes you incharge of hawthorn , i just stated that in my post it was reffering to the hawthorn board not to you your a no name, you dont make the draft choices do you?
ohh well

 

[Fanatico]

The opening line was

So you're the one who isn't very bright because that is what my post was addressing.

Only a fool would be concerned at this point in Kennedy's career and you're not a good judge of talent or pace.

Since you used the term we are you and C4 a couple?

You're both fools for defending your comments and this is a **** thread.

see now your just repeating yourself my point was that we were concerned about his sluggish style, then you came on and put in your sarcasm and interprited that we dont think he's good. You should really re-read the opening post . Dear me cypher it appears that you are the foolish man with your cheap 2 cent comments.

 

[Philhawk]

hahaha i dont think i was reffering to you but since youve chosen to jump in anyway you should really thing before you type, because what the He** makes you incharge of hawthorn ,

****! It's actually painful to interpret what you're trying to say? Trying to delve through the rubbish, you say, "What the heck makes me in charge of Hawthorn?" You make a stupid remark about Hawthorn, to which I respond, but that to you implies that I am "incharge of hawhorn"?

i just stated that in my post it was reffering to the hawthorn board not to you your a no name, you dont make the draft choices do you?
ohh well

Sorry I actually can't understand you. Now this time do it slowly and in english. Thanks.

 

[Fanatico]

****! It's actually painful to interpret what you're trying to say? Trying to delve through the rubbish, you say, "What the heck makes me in charge of Hawthorn?" You make a stupid remark about Hawthorn, to which I respond, but that to you implies that I am "incharge of hawhorn"?



Sorry I actually can't understand you. Now this time do it slowly and in english. Thanks.

i just stated that in my post it was reffering to the hawthorn board not to you your a no name, you dont make the draft choices do you?
ohh well

there you go.