Noobz0r
Tom Jonas Fan Club Junior VP
- Joined
- Aug 18, 2009
- Posts
- 30,325
- Reaction score
- 40,078
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
Haven't found a thread for this anywhere yet, so apologies if this has already been discussed. I caught a snippet of news concerning the Adelaide Oval planning to switch to a drop in pitch, I assume it has to do with the oval's redevelopment and future use in other sporting codes (primarily AFL).
Watching the Gabba test and almost 2 days of the Hobart test, I can safely say that I love the pitches that have been prepared for both. Especially in the current test at Bellerive, it has made for batsmen having to really apply themselves, and fight for every run that they make. Traditionally, drop in pitches are fairly lifeless, and make for absolute roads.
Another issue created by these lifeless drop ins is that our state cricketers are facing even more diluted difficult batting conditions. Our state cricketers will be unable to develop their skills in different conditions. As we've seen recently, our international cricketers have struggled on a pitch with life in it, and I can't help but think that a drop in pitch at AO will contribute to this situation (I might be drawing a long bow here).
Another point the argument against this is romance of different test wickets. In fact, the Argus Review's key principles for pitches suggest that each test wicket should be "unique, depending on local soil, history and climatic conditions". I love the fact that the WACA is (or was) known to be bouncy and the Gabba was known to assist fast bowlers early, and that the SCG is conducive to spin moreso than any other pitch in Australia. A drop in pitch at AO will mean that it will lose a part of it's image.
In short: I wish they weren't going ahead with their decision!
Watching the Gabba test and almost 2 days of the Hobart test, I can safely say that I love the pitches that have been prepared for both. Especially in the current test at Bellerive, it has made for batsmen having to really apply themselves, and fight for every run that they make. Traditionally, drop in pitches are fairly lifeless, and make for absolute roads.
Another issue created by these lifeless drop ins is that our state cricketers are facing even more diluted difficult batting conditions. Our state cricketers will be unable to develop their skills in different conditions. As we've seen recently, our international cricketers have struggled on a pitch with life in it, and I can't help but think that a drop in pitch at AO will contribute to this situation (I might be drawing a long bow here).
Another point the argument against this is romance of different test wickets. In fact, the Argus Review's key principles for pitches suggest that each test wicket should be "unique, depending on local soil, history and climatic conditions". I love the fact that the WACA is (or was) known to be bouncy and the Gabba was known to assist fast bowlers early, and that the SCG is conducive to spin moreso than any other pitch in Australia. A drop in pitch at AO will mean that it will lose a part of it's image.
In short: I wish they weren't going ahead with their decision!






(Matter of fact might chuck the highlights DVD in now
)