-
Rd 14 Reviews + Club boards »
BL v StK · WB v FRE · RIC v HAW · ADE v SYD · NM v COL · GWS v PA ·
Read the wrap-up and post your "Liked, Learned, Hated" right here.
Umpiring Questionable Umpiring Decisions
- Thread starter Sentinel
- Start date
- Tagged users None
you might be thinking of another incident.
another poster saw the same thing i saw and posted this.
Was contest in middle of the ground between serong and Sidebottom resulting in a ball up
Nicholls called for Sidebottom to give him the ball twice but he just left it on the ground and ran off .
Nicholls was shaking his head
- Mar 3, 2022
- 5,295
- 7,009
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
A rule that doesn't get consistently enforced. Case in point McCreerys run last night. Rules are rules the Collingwood mantra until it goes against them.
- Sep 20, 2010
- 1,439
- 3,850
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Yeah, they throw it down like the rule says they can. Not sure they actually throw it away from the umpire.
If they do, a free kick should be paid.
Vicbi
And yes, it’s #VICBIAS did you see the media going on about the Hawthorn OOF free kick in the last 2 minutes that came off Burgoynes shoulder? Of course not.
Even this morning, all I hear is the controversial “last minute” free kick which was actually given with the game 6 minutes from full time with a 19 point margin.
Vicbias in the football media is almost worse than the AFL itself. The AFL people have guaranteed salaries can occasionally be fair, whereas the media need their accreditation to keep their jobs and so are slaves to their “non disparagement” clauses.
Nonsense. There was no time on error, the umpire called time on like every other set shot, when the player gets the ball back, is back on their line, and the protected zone is cleared. Otherwise he calls time on, then pays 50 for being in the protected zone. Stop listening to Vicbias media clickbait and understand the rules.
And yes, it’s #VICBIAS did you see the media going on about the Hawthorn OOF free kick in the last 2 minutes that came off Burgoynes shoulder? Of course not.
Even this morning, all I hear is the controversial “last minute” free kick which was actually given with the game 6 minutes from full time with a 19 point margin.
Vicbias in the football media is almost worse than the AFL itself. The AFL people have guaranteed salaries can occasionally be fair, whereas the media need their accreditation to keep their jobs and so are slaves to their “non disparagement” clauses.
sr36
TheBrownDog
The AFL admitted that time on was an umpire error.
Umpires make errors or in Rankines case controversial calls. The ones that are in tight finishes against non Vic teams make it into this thread, the ones that go against vic teams dont usually because well um, there might be a fair bit of bias from the mob yelling vicbias.
View attachment 1000027667.mp4
Another example of rules being inconsistently paid (source). Led directly to a Collingwood goal from memory.
Another example of rules being inconsistently paid (source). Led directly to a Collingwood goal from memory.
- Apr 3, 2017
- 977
- 2,407
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
The rule isn’t about returning the ball to the umpire though, it’s about time wasting.
- Mar 3, 2022
- 5,295
- 7,009
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Umpire gave them warnings at previous stoppages. Enough is enough.
- Mar 4, 2015
- 2,479
- 3,114
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Central Districts
Yes, it was pretty good to see a bit of poetic justice go back Collingwoods way after their fans and media defended last weeks decision that rarely gets paid with an equally rare decision going against them last night.
- Mar 4, 2015
- 2,479
- 3,114
- AFL Club
- Port Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Central Districts
Like they set the precedent last week for running too far and let Mcreery run 30m this week.
Yeah, its bullshit, but you know, shit happens.
Quaynor said in an interview after the game that he didn't actually touch it.
Still waiting for him to pay a free like he did against worpel.
Seen daicos walk through the circle several times without a free.
fusion
Premium Gold
North Melbourne - 2024 Hugh Greenwood Player Sponsor
Veteran
North Melbourne - 2023 Aaron Hall and Flynn Perez Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - 2022 Aaron Hall and Flynn Perez Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - 2021 Taylor Garner and Flynn Perez Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - 2020 Taylor Garner and Flynn Perez Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - 2020 Aileen Gilroy Player Sponsor
North Melbourne - 2019 Bailey Scott and Jy Simpkin Player Sponsor
The look on the umpires face says it all... He's annoyed that Sidebottom didn't return the ball, so he's looking to pay one later on.
The AFL makes the rules so technical, no wonder the fans are sick of the umpires. I think someone already posted the video of LDU not returning the ball to the umpire within the first 5 seconds of a game last year and getting penalised. This stuff happens all the time, but only really comes to attention in close matches.
- Aug 6, 2021
- 6,269
- 11,353
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
There are two specific rules that it falls under:
“Fails to follow the instruction of an umpire”.
“Engages in time wasting”
Again, I don’t think the umpire should have paid that free kick. But it is a free kick according to the rules.
Moving forward, if the AFL comes out and says that that will be a free kick every time you don’t return the ball to an umpire, the same way it’s 50 if you don’t give it to the player who has the free kick, I think that would be a good change.
I'm sure you feel like an absolute knob given Quaynor himself said he didn't touch it. Deplorable.
On Pixel 7 using BigFooty.com mobile app
- Aug 17, 2006
- 23,397
- 21,745
- AFL Club
- Geelong
I actually switched the game off after the Bobby Hill mark and then sat down to watch the last 10 minutes this morning to find out what happened. It was interesting to see that at the immediate ball up before the incident, the Collingwood player put the ball on the ground instead of handing it back to the umpire, don't think it was Nicholls. I couldn't be bothered personally, but it would be interesting for someone to go back over the games and see how many times the Collingwood players gave the ball directly back to the umpire for a ball up or throw in, compared to Fremantle players.
It's a harsh lesson to learn, but I'd love to know what Sullivan was thinking, it seemed as though he was even facing Nicholls' direction (so he must have heard the direction that the umpire's voice was coming from) and decided to throw Daicos a 'no look' pass in pretty much the opposite direction, which was possibly the straw that broke the camel's back.
It's a harsh lesson to learn, but I'd love to know what Sullivan was thinking, it seemed as though he was even facing Nicholls' direction (so he must have heard the direction that the umpire's voice was coming from) and decided to throw Daicos a 'no look' pass in pretty much the opposite direction, which was possibly the straw that broke the camel's back.
Last edited:
- Aug 17, 2006
- 23,397
- 21,745
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Yes, exactly the incident I noticed and mentioned above, though I got it wrong and it was Nicholls. I'd put my house on it that Sidebottom's actions factored in to the decision.
Wow, McRae is a whinging sook when things don't go his way. Entitled much? Lucky he's not the coach of Freo, Richmond or Adelaide if he doesn't like copping a rough umpiring decision.
On Pixel 7 using BigFooty.com mobile app
On Pixel 7 using BigFooty.com mobile app
- Aug 6, 2021
- 6,269
- 11,353
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
Although I disagree with the call, it is kind of funny that Sidebottom doing that came back to bite him.
I hate it when players don’t give it to the umpire when it would be so easy to just lob it up to them, it’s such an entitled thing to do. It’s like when the waiter comes to grab your plates and you just continue to have a chat while they have to reach over the table to grab everything, like yeah it’s their job but would it kill you to help them out and just chuck them the ball?
- Apr 25, 2012
- 1,987
- 2,746
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- stirling senators
Well I thought it wasn't time wasting and not worthy of a free kick because the Collingwood player had his back to the umpire and handed the ball to a player facing the umpire. I'd call it efficient time management.
but no one has posted the video
but no one has posted the video
- Sep 20, 2010
- 1,439
- 3,850
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
Yep, here's Collingwood getting a free for it
- Aug 17, 2006
- 23,397
- 21,745
- AFL Club
- Geelong
The other way of looking at it though is that sometimes it's worth club's practising what they preach with the "respect for umpires" rhetoric. It can definitely come back to bite you otherwise and this wasn't frustration boiling over, it was just carelessness.
It's a stiff penalty, but I don't really have a problem with it, don't really see much difference to an umpire paying 50 when the opponent fails to make a reasonable effort to give the ball back to the player who's won the free kick.
- Aug 17, 2006
- 23,397
- 21,745
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Funnily enough, I heard a story from a person who used to work at Collingwood that they'd had issues with (some) players being a bit high and mighty and lacking basic courtesy and consideration for the 'ordinary' staff members and making their lives/jobs far more difficult than they should have been.
After a 'straw that broke the camel's back' incident for this person with a player, they were finally fed up enough to confront the player and give him a piece of their mind: that because he was too selfish to give up five minutes and perform a basic duty of being an AFL footballer, it had directly impacted this person's ability to perform their job satisfactorily. They hadn't been keen to name names, but yep: it was Steele.
In fairness, they also said it was a positive airing out and that Sidebottom took the criticism on the chin and promised to lift his game.
Similar threads
