Carbine Chaos
TK Defender
- Joined
- Apr 1, 2009
- Posts
- 68,470
- Reaction score
- 108,336
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Perth FC, Everton, Delhi
In all seriousness I think Harris missing will make the series a 50/50 prospect. Starc still concerns me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Round 2
The Golden Ticket - Corporate tickets, functions, Open Air Boxes at the Adelaide Oval, ENGIE, Gabba, MCG, Marvel, Optus & People First Stadiums. Corporate Suites at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
In all seriousness I think Harris missing will make the series a 50/50 prospect. Starc still concerns me.
Think it's just precautionary with such a short turnaround to the first test.Ok, Harris pulled out with soreness. What are his chances at being selected for the 1st test now? Slim I'd say.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I actually think England should be favourites for the Tests. Home conditions make it very difficult, as it has been for some time now.
We are certainly capable of winning though.
I actually think England should be favourites for the Tests. Home conditions make it very difficult, as it has been for some time now.
We are certainly capable of winning though.
I'm sure it will be broadcast on radio, nothing at the Essex website about streams.
Tix are for members only for Saturday. Booo. I wanted to go and take a look.
I don't understand that, wouldn't they want as many people as possible to come and watch
Not a great start, Rogers out for 21 and Clarke out for a duck!
Well, Day 1 is a sell-out so perhaps they are all sold out too apart from members tix.
So if Harris is out of the first test, surely that works against Watson? Need someone who can bowl quite a few containing overs if Johnson and Starc go awry and how many can Watson bowl realistically?
A few years ago I would've completely agreed. My impressions of him the past couple of years though are that he hasn't bowled much at all and he's been relatively expensive when he has. There is a difference between the high 130kph Watson of yesteryear and the mid 120's one of today. Having said that, the only thing I have to back this up is a dodgy and perhaps selective memory so I could easily be mistaken.I actually think it helps Watsons chances. He generally keeps things pretty tight when he bowls...I'm really uncomfortable with an attack that includes all 3 Mitchell's
Wow, that's good! What is the capacity of the ground? (I can't imagine a tour match being sold out here)
A few years ago I would've completely agreed. My impressions of him the past couple of years though are that he hasn't bowled much at all and he's been relatively expensive when he has. There is a difference between the high 130kph Watson of yesteryear and the mid 120's one of today. Having said that, the only thing I have to back this up is a dodgy and perhaps selective memory so I could easily be mistaken.
Counter arguement to the above is he has experience and English conditions probably agree with his bowling style more.
The pitches he's bowled on haven't given him much assistance either, besides Brisbane.Mitch Marsh so far in his fledgling test career has a very good econ rate. Only one wicket though.
Yup that was my impression of him.Mitch Marsh so far in his fledgling test career has a very good econ rate. Only one wicket though.