WikiLeaks Assange

Remove this Banner Ad

herculez09 said:
Why do you hate Assange so much?
Click to expand...

I don't. I continue to be surprised that a group of posters who see a conspiracy in every shadow think this guy is whiter than white. It's all about him.
 
herculez09 said:
Did you dislike him prior to the current US election cycle?

I quite like him. I've always liked him. I haven't really followed him that closely though.
Click to expand...
The US election is more than reason enough. He doesn't beleive in free information. Only free information that helps his cause. Plus there is the rape case and the fact he refuses to face up to it. Plus I know people who were at one time close friends and the stories don't put his character in a good light.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Green Hammer said:
I thought you were an advocate for anti corruption activism. Obviously not.
Click to expand...

It would appear Julian is advocating for Julian. Again.

I'm told he's a paragon of virtue, but there is the distinct whiff he's in someone's pocket. Other than the poor Ecuadorean embassy staff, of course.
 
Messenger said:
It would appear Julian is advocating for Julian. Again.

I'm told he's a paragon of virtue, but there is the distinct whiff he's in someone's pocket. Other than the poor Ecuadorean embassy staff, of course.
Click to expand...
Was it a good thing that the American public were made aware of democrats rigging the system to ensure Clinton got nominated over Sanders?
 
Messenger said:
It would appear Julian is advocating for Julian. Again.

I'm told he's a paragon of virtue, but there is the distinct whiff he's in someone's pocket. Other than the poor Ecuadorean embassy staff, of course.
Click to expand...

He's merely a publisher, who happens to put both his neck & his life on the line in the name of free-speech....A virtue & core ingredient of a free & democratic society, that many of us happen to share....And for which. one is currently either jailed or assassinated for, in the U.S of A.

It's hardly about Julian....It's about government hypocrisy, corruption & power....U.S constitution is on Julian's side; It's government is the enemy.
 
Every time I see the word, 'Assange', for some reason I initially read 'Assuage', which is totally inaccurate as a depiction of the man. I make lots of mistakes. This post is one of them.
 
Green Hammer said:
Was it a good thing that the American public were made aware of democrats rigging the system to ensure Clinton got nominated over Sanders?
Click to expand...

If it was true Clinton paid for it.

Are you concerned that Wikileaks are picking sides again, that they aren't "just publishers"?

 
Messenger said:
If it was true Clinton paid for it.

Are you concerned that Wikileaks are picking sides again, that they aren't "just publishers"?

Click to expand...
He publishers leaks. Right?
And. I didnt hear your anwser. Was itca good thing for the american oublic to know?yes ir no??

You not insinuating the the democrates lied in their very own emails are you when you say "if true"???
 
Green Hammer said:
He publishers leaks. Right?
And. I didnt hear your anwser. Was itca good thing for the american oublic to know?yes ir no??

You not insinuating the the democrates lied in their very own emails are you when you say "if true"???
Click to expand...

Sure, I'll play. It was good. Wikileaks had an agenda and they executed it. The dems got caught.

Now I need an answer from you. Not, "oh, he's a publisher". Are you ok with him taking sides?
 
Messenger said:
Sure, I'll play. It was good. Wikileaks had an agenda and they executed it. The dems got caught.

Now I need an answer from you. Not, "oh, he's a publisher". Are you ok with him taking sides?
Click to expand...
What do you mean picking sides? What dont u know about trump that hasnt been highlighted by msm? Wasnt the leak from a DNC insider??
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Green Hammer said:
What do you mean picking sides? What dont u know about trump that hasnt been highlighted by msm? Wasnt the leak from a DNC insider??
Click to expand...

I'm talking about taking sides in France.
 
Messenger said:
Sure, I'll play. It was good. Wikileaks had an agenda and they executed it. The dems got caught.
Click to expand...

Assange can only publish what comes to hand & is verifiable....But it didn't help that Hilary wanted his head & had one of his own lawyers, pushed in front of an on-coming train....There can be little doubt that his 'services' were utilized for political gain/expediency.
 
yebiga said:
Don't think of it as sides
His anti establishment
It's not football
Click to expand...
Anti-establishment type who... ran for public office last federal election.

He does have principles (and Zizek has written extensively on them) however cosying up to a government (thanks Putin) that suppresses free speech in the name of free speech doesn't gel.
 
Mofra said:
Anti-establishment type who... ran for public office last federal election.

He does have principles (and Zizek has written extensively on them) however cosying up to a government (thanks Putin) that suppresses free speech in the name of free speech doesn't gel.
Click to expand...
Everything you just typed is nonsense
Mind boggling nonsense
If I had time I'd unpack it for you but it would only anger you.
Think about the lack of any veracity in your post
Think of where this's man is
What his achieved
Be ashamed
 
yebiga said:
Everything you just typed is nonsense
Mind boggling nonsense
If I had time I'd unpack it for you but it would only anger you.
Think about the lack of any veracity in your post
Think of where this's man is
What his achieved
Be ashamed
Click to expand...
So you've... got nothing.
Ok.

Putin is anti-free speech. Assange is cosying up to Putin. That's inarguable.

Now I do have some sympathy for his original position (and was pretty close with the workings of the Wikileaks party senate bid believe it or not) however the impact on international diplomacy is a classic case of unintended consequence.
So here's a thought exercise for you:
If Wikileaks was around in October 1962 do you think a US-Russian war would have been avoided. Yes or no?
 
Mofra said:
So you've... got nothing.
Ok.

Putin is anti-free speech. Assange is cosying up to Putin. That's inarguable.

Now I do have some sympathy for his original position (and was pretty close with the workings of the Wikileaks party senate bid believe it or not) however the impact on international diplomacy is a classic case of unintended consequence.
So here's a thought exercise for you:
If Wikileaks was around in October 1962 do you think a US-Russian war would have been avoided. Yes or no?
Click to expand...
Assange is play up to Putin in the Ecuadorian embassy in London
Seriously you install the most insane crap in your head and think it's real - could you trace where you even got that notion

What r u doing moderating?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top