Remove this Banner Ad

Bartel - Guilty Plea

  • Thread starter Thread starter cats2rise
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

jess_555 said:
RIDICULOUS!!!!!!! I am SOOOOOOO ANGRY AT THE AFL TRIBUNAL!!!!!!!! :mad:
It was a great bump by Jimmy and I thought it MIGHT be looked at but have no chance of getting 2 bloody weeks!!!!! GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRrrrrr
I say fight fight fight it Jimmy!
Click to expand...

ARGHH me too I am so ****ed off stupid ********s don't even know what the **** they are doing.
 
chapmanmagic35 said:
Take the two, unless they have something good up their sleeve that they really think could get him off.

Big loss.
Click to expand...

It is so annoying and you don't know what the tribunal are going to do, he could contest it, lose, and instead of getting 3 he gets 29 weeks. The tribunal is more inconsistant then anything I know.
Stupid puns.
 
That is a disgrace. wasn't even that high! It was a fair, solid but legit bump. the tribunal should go adjudicate netball- it'd be more fitting.
 
**** it. I'm deciding what number to put on my new jumper too, was thinking no.3.... >_<
 
My girlfriend also stated that Channel 9 constantly showed the incident, and it probably isn't the one everyone is writing about. It was directly in the middle of the ground, not the really good hit later in the game where he connected with a good and fair bump.

Not too sure when it happened, but it was definite contact with the elbow/hip hitting him in the head. Although I didn't expect 3 weeks out of it, especially when the same/similar hits were done by other players that were let off.

Very surprised, but this is the up and down tribunal system that we have, it is not direct in its approach. Constantly changes its thought process. I used to have great respect for the guys on it, how that has changed over this year.

The inclusions this week will be Rooke and Mooney for Wojak and Bartel. Just for a change, play the big guy in the middle, let him be like a human wrecking ball, smash those little Saints.

That will blow their minds.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

thegerman said:
The inclusions this week will be Rooke and Mooney for Wojak and Bartel.
Click to expand...

Can't seen Ottens, King, Blake, Playfair and Mooney all playing.

Henry for Cam, and Jarad for Jimmy.
 
Glassjaw said:
Can't seen Ottens, King, Blake, Playfair and Mooney all playing.

Henry for Cam, and Jarad for Jimmy.
Click to expand...

With Goose out for the season I could easily see us playing the same stratergy as against Brisbane. St Kilda will have severe problems with height in their team particularly in the area of ruckmen and backline players. That said I think it is one too many with Mooney.

How good would it be if that fool Thomas played Riewalt at center half back again.

How the hell are we expected to add N.Ablett, McCarthy, and Hawkins to that Lineup?
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

He has a few priors but FFS I don't see why a warning in 2004 should have anything to do with this. Maybe in the Moondog's case cause he is a consistent serial offender but Jimmy is hardly a dirty player.

Absolute shyte
 
Shell said:
He has a few priors doesnt he??? :confused:

Do they carry over to this offence?? I think maybe they shoulda taken the 2, but what do I know.. i have been wrong on other cases during the year!
Click to expand...

I think if he's bargained discounts before as such then he goes onto a kind of good behaviour bond, where previous "bargained-off" points can count if he breaks the bond. He could well go for three now but you never know, they might be able to argue their way out of it...
 
It is pathetic.
They are hoping to get the charge downgraded
'The Cats' are hoping to successfully plead guilty to a lesser offence with Bartel's original charge assessed as reckless conduct, medium impact, in play and high contact,

But the Cats will either argue his conduct was negligent or that the impact of his collision with Selwood was low in the hope he may escape with only a one match suspension.'

Getting it down to one match would be better, but ffs I thought there was nothing in it and if channel nine hadn't of showed it ten million times they wouldn't have even looked at it.
 
Champ39 said:
It is pathetic.
They are hoping to get the charge downgraded
'The Cats' are hoping to successfully plead guilty to a lesser offence with Bartel's original charge assessed as reckless conduct, medium impact, in play and high contact,

But the Cats will either argue his conduct was negligent or that the impact of his collision with Selwood was low in the hope he may escape with only a one match suspension.'

Getting it down to one match would be better, but ffs I thought there was nothing in it and if channel nine hadn't of showed it ten million times they wouldn't have even looked at it.
Click to expand...

Ah dont bring up that bull-shyte argument about the media now...
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

cats_09
    • Like
Mod. Notice Please Read re Copyright: Posting Newspaper Articles
Replies
1
Views
2K
iameviljez
iameviljez

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom