Ben Marsh.

[Go South]

Should he have been delisted 2 years ago?

 

[noddy]

Originally posted by Go South
Should he have been delisted 2 years ago?

no, not unless we had/have another ruckman in the wings,

 

[macca23]

Originally posted by Go South
Should he have been delisted 2 years ago?

On application and performance - Yes. He's a bloody disgrace.

But noddy's right - there is no back-up ruckman and he'll survive until there is.

 

[Damp Squarie]

as above...

He must feel like a spare prick at a wedding

 

[mentalgrind]

Must say that I haven't seen much of the boy play but his effort trying to chase down Carroll near the end of the first half had me in stitches.

 

[Stiffy_18]

I think noddy hit the nail on the head. Marsh is around simply because there is noone better which sounds a bit scary. Dare I say that if Crows cannot secure a couple of ruckman at the end of the year Ben Marsh will be around in 2004 unfortunately.

 

[footychick]

Originally posted by mentalgrind
Must say that I haven't seen much of the boy play but his effort trying to chase down Carroll near the end of the first half had me in stitches.

I know!!! I was almost rolling around on the floor i was laughing so hard...Im laughing now just thinking of it....

 

[ScottWelshLuva]

Originally posted by Go South
Should he have been delisted 2 years ago?

I've told everyone and I'll say it again. HE'S NOT WORTH 10c. Looking at sundays performance he has gone down by 5c. He should have been gone ages ago and kept in the westies where he's obviously more comfortable

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Originally posted by Stiffy_18
I think noddy hit the nail on the head. Marsh is around simply because there is noone better which sounds a bit scary. Dare I say that if Crows cannot secure a couple of ruckman at the end of the year Ben Marsh will be around in 2004 unfortunately.

But AFC have had their chances to draft an alternative ruckman, such as Jamar. So in answer to the question, yes Marsh should have been delisted 2 years ago.

 

[kirky]

Quite funny on Sunday in the first half, we had Carey and Marsh who had the turning circle of the Queen Mary. Problem is the guy isn't even worth trade bait.

 

[Blues_Girl]

As long as he's on our lists, we have something extra to heckle at SANFL matches

 

[PAfolwr]

Champion, and will definitely play this weekend.
Burns should be a good chance too.

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

Originally posted by PAfolwr
Champion, and will definitely play this weekend.

Perhaps Marsh should play on Lade & they can search for each others heart, considering they're both soft as butter!

 

[PAfolwr]

Originally posted by Kane McGoodwin
Perhaps Marsh should play on Lade & they can search for each others heart, considering they're both soft as butter!

Marsh on Lade.
Burton on Burgoyne.
Showdown takes on a new meaning.

Having said that, at least Lade did play well before his shocking injuries. He was one of our better players. Hopefully after last week he has turned the corner.

 

[Jars458]

Marsh is not up to it

He and Reilly can have a rest this week.

 

[Blues_Girl]

Originally posted by Jars458
Marsh is not up to it

He and Reilly can have a rest this week.

What do you think Mattners chances are of playing this week? He has been impressive in the SANFL for the last couple of weeks.

 

[Stiffy_18]

Originally posted by Blues_Girl
What do you think Mattners chances are of playing this week? He has been impressive in the SANFL for the last couple of weeks.

I think he has had a very good couple of weeks but I think Massie is more of a chance. I think we might go for a bit more experience.

 

[macca23]

Originally posted by Stiffy_18
I think he has had a very good couple of weeks but I think Massie is more of a chance. I think we might go for a bit more experience.

Agreed Stiffy. No place for the faint hearted or the inexperienced out there next Saturday mate.

Port will obviously replace Salopek with a more experienced player for this one and IMO we have to do the same with Reilly.

Marsh must go - that's a given.