In 2026?Banfield will be the Mason Wood replacement
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

In 2026?Banfield will be the Mason Wood replacement
I think Charlie will debut next season but may not play a lot of senior games...2027 and beyond will be a different storyIn 2026?
1. OK.. I see. But he is taking up the space of a potentially creative forward. I admit, that I thought this defensive forward thing was an excuse for players losing their edge. At best, I thought their job was to shut down a running back like Jack Sinclair. With five on the bench now I wonder if a team can bank on the concept of a specialist defensive forward. I think defenders and mids can fall into the forward line for that.
2. Yeah, I should hold off on Mitcho pronouncements but I think he's frankly been disappointing as a forward. I realise he has played that small ruckman role because of his strength and skill. He's definitely got something and its exciting when the ball goes up there and he's around. Maybe my expectations are too high? I just wondered if he might be more suited down back. That strength! A bit of Spud, a bit of Jake Lever?
Mentioned it before but I am hoping Boxshall will also get a crack at this. Another excellent runner who is very good aerially. Was happy to hear Dalrymple throw his name up when discussing the role they see Banfield ultimately playing on a wingBanfield will be the Mason Wood replacement
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
No way Hill is not in seniors. Tauru out, maybe Hunter gets the chop, but I'm a fan. Ronnie Byrnes is an EH Holden, he might be there. Wilson played one good game in '25. Stocker will play 11 games.AFL Best 23:
B: Stocker, Wilkie, Silvagni
HB: Clark, Tauru, Sinclair
C: Wilson, Flanders, Windhager
HF: Hall, Marshall, Higgins
F: Owens, King, Ryan
R: TDK, NAS, Macrae
Int: Phillipou, Garcia, Sharman, Wood, Boxshall
VFL Team:
B: O'Connell, Howard, Hastie
HB: Fincher, Barrat, Travaglia
C: Banfield, Byrnes, Hill
HF: Henry, Keeler, Said
F: Collard, Caminiti, Butler
R: Dodson, Dow, Carroll
I think you are saying it was a kind of 'make do' situation in the '25 season.Both our forwards and back have been cobbled together last season. Owens would love to have King back and it should allow us to play on our terms.
Higgo had a career best season from the point of view of goals but his worst season from a possession perspective and worst from an i50 perspective. So clearly he was playing a deeper fwd role all year.So you have a guy who comes in, whose strengths are areas where we lack in our front third.
- Xfactor
- Overhead marking
- goals/assists
Whose stats are similar to that of Higgins who as a fanbase we all universally agree was a career season and more to come hopefully.
Who would enable us to explore using Higgins/Ryan/Henry and whoever else through our midfield like the likes of: Hawthorn, Geelong, Sydney, Adelaide,Collingwood and the back2back premiers Brisbane use to maximum effect.
Yet we can’t see the value or in your own words, “remain unconvinced” of Ryan - who has done this with impact across multiple seasons.
Such an interesting point of view some fans have of Ryan.
I think you are saying it was a kind of 'make do' situation in the '25 season.
King will be back, up forward
Howard will be back, down back.
etc.,
We love Michito and Cooper.
Both these guys were showered in love, and rightly so.
I dunno, both disappoint me somehow.
But with big Max back, it could all fall into place.
is it because out forward entry was so poor?
I think we improved in '25, but our win/loss, not so much. Bottom 4 until the late junk-games surge.
1. To be clear I was talking about a pressure forward, which is different to a defensive forward, which is more like how you described. I think if you need to tag a defender, it's better having a mid do that to free up a forward.1. OK.. I see. But he is taking up the space of a potentially creative forward. I admit, that I thought this defensive forward thing was an excuse for players losing their edge. At best, I thought their job was to shut down a running back like Jack Sinclair. With five on the bench now I wonder if a team can bank on the concept of a specialist defensive forward. I think defenders and mids can fall into the forward line for that.
2. Yeah, I should hold off on Mitcho pronouncements but I think he's frankly been disappointing as a forward. I realise he has played that small ruckman role because of his strength and skill. He's definitely got something and its exciting when the ball goes up there and he's around. Maybe my expectations are too high? I just wondered if he might be more suited down back. That strength! A bit of Spud, a bit of Jake Lever?
Another 23;
B. Wilkie Howard ???????
H.B. Hastie JSOS Sinclair
C. Henry Pou Ryan
H.F. Owens Marshall Wilson
F. Sharman King Higgins
Foll. Tdk NWM Hall
l/C. Butler, Flanders, Macrae, Windhager, Wood
Didn't mind Caminiti back there at all.I'm glad i'm not the only one who wants to have all of Howard, Wilkie and JSOS in the backline.
Lucky for you it’s best 23I’ve never done a best 22 I just can’t do them it does my head in.

Probably Stewie LoeweLucky for you it’s best 23![]()

You need wingers with elite endurance...neither Henry or Ryan have that.I'm glad i'm not the only one who wants to have all of Howard, Wilkie and JSOS in the backline.
I see your point about Ryan not necessarily having a defined role, but my counters would be that:"Some fans"... I love it when I get this considering what I would believe is a very well earned reputation for discussing things in good faith.
I have a different view to many on what plagues our forward line, which in 2025 was the best performing (highest scoring) it had been since 2017 with the exception of 2020: lack of forward pressure. Basically, I believe we miss not an x-factor player who can roll through midfield (this could be achieved IMO with some combination of Hall and Higgins who we already have), but a genuine pressure forward. We miss 2020/2023 Dan Butler. It could be Butler returning to form or Collard taking the next step, but I doubt it's Liam Ryan.
I also believe we can't go into next season and have sustainable success playing Owens as a third forward, with a lot of the time him playing on the ground with only one other key forward as one rests. IMO Owens needs to play as the fourth forward. That forward seven man rotation looks like this:
Genuine full forward: Max King
Lead up marking half forward: Cooper Sharman
Resting ruckman who can play forward and is a get out target: Rowan Marshall
Hybrid marking/ground level forward: Mitch Owens
Genuine goalkicking small forward: Jack Higgins
Pressure forward: Dan Butler
High half-forward: Max Hall
Everyone except Butler, right now, I don't really want to see Ryan get a game in front of. He would have to outperform one of those six at their specific roles. And there is little evidence that Ryan can become the pressure forward Butler has been in the only two years in the last 14 where we've made finals.
So I struggle to see how Ryan plays without one of these things happening:
1. We play too small
2. We don't have a pressure forward
3. Higgins or Hall end up at VFL
4. Some other promising mid (think Garcia, Boxshall or Wilson) misses out to accommodate a forward in the mid rotation
I sincerely wish Ryan smashes it, but I don't understand it from a list management decision. Yes he has undeniable talents, but I don't want to see other things sidelined (such as see us play too small or with no pressure forward).
Then your 23 could something like:
B: Stocker, Howard, Wilkie
HB: Sinclair, Silvagni, Clark
C: Wilson, Nas, Wood
Foll: TDK, Flanders, Windy
HF: Hall, Sharman, Owens
F: Higgins, King, Butler
Bench: Macrae, Garcia, Marshall, Ryan, Tauru
Can argue the various ins and outs from those listed squads but bloody hell we have not had depth like this for quite some time.AFL Best 23:
B: Stocker, Wilkie, Silvagni
HB: Clark, Tauru, Sinclair
C: Wilson, Flanders, Windhager
HF: Hall, Marshall, Higgins
F: Owens, King, Ryan
R: TDK, NAS, Macrae
Int: Phillipou, Garcia, Sharman, Wood, Boxshall
VFL Team:
B: O'Connell, Howard, Hastie
HB: Fincher, Barrat, Travaglia
C: Banfield, Byrnes, Hill
HF: Henry, Keeler, Said
F: Collard, Caminiti, Butler
R: Dodson, Dow, Carroll
Marshall could probably be an excellent full back but there’s been no indication he’s gonna play there. Silvagni, Howard, Caminiti much more likely in that positionB: O’Connell, Wilkie, Sinclair
HB: Clark, Marshall, Carroll
C: Hill, Flanders, Windhager
HF: Hall, Tauru, Higgins
F: Owens, Sharman, Ryan
R: TDK, NAS, Macrae
Int: Phillipou, Wilson, King, Wood, Boxshall
Position on ladder: 10th
Fate: Wild card WIN > WIN > WIN > WIN > WIN = FLAG
Silvagni: Won't be available I suspectMarshall could probably be an excellent full back but there’s been no indication he’s gonna play there. Silvagni, Howard, Caminiti much more likely in that position
Given Caminiti is back training in defence, perhaps the club believe JSOS won't be available for some time.
Let's hope JSOS can get his body right after the break and back on the park. The media will be looking for any excuse to put knives in the club after our recruiting spending.
Jake Niall has already had a shot at us, putting the success of our football program ahead of paying out debt and still receiving handouts. They all quickly forget how financially unequal the fixturing is to clubs like ours. He is another who takes pleasure in having a go at our club.
We have to get the onfield stuff right before financial success takes place..winning games is paramount for 2026.Given Caminiti is back training in defence, perhaps the club believe JSOS won't be available for some time.
Let's hope JSOS can get his body right after the break and back on the park. The media will be looking for any excuse to put knives in the club after our recruiting spending.
Jake Niall has already had a shot at us, putting the success of our football program ahead of paying out debt and still receiving handouts. They all quickly forget how financially unequal the fixturing is to clubs like ours. He is another who takes pleasure in having a go at our club.