Remove this Banner Ad

Best young List?

Best Young List?

  • Hawks

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Pies

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Port

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lions

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I think the Hawks.

Collingwood's is good but a little overated. They still depend alot on a number of older guys.

Port's is pretty good and they drafted really well last year.

Brisbanes isn't that impressive. It's not bad but I wouldn't say top 4.


Carlton's list would be one of the top 4 young lists.
 
Unortunately for the blues results are yet to prove that!

That is because they have no experience along side them.

I'd like to see how the Pies youngsters would go if you took Clement (who retires), Wakelin, Burns, Rocca and Lockyer out of the side.

Based on your logic Sydney has had one of the best young lists in the comp over the past few years.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

That is because they have no experience along side them.

I'd like to see how the Pies youngsters would go if you took Clement (who retires), Wakelin, Burns, Rocca and Lockyer out of the side.

Based on your logic Sydney has had one of the best young lists in the comp over the past few years.

They'd probably go about as bad as Carltons have lately. But apparently the Carlton bunch are royalty anyway :rolleyes:
 
I would say that the margin is lot more narrow than you think. If the Hawks do have the best young list, the Pies would be a very close second!

The problem the Pies have is that apart from Pendlebury, the rest of their younger player group are middle-of-the-roaders e.g Maxwell, and Shaws are good triers, but mid-to-low-range talent wise. :)
 
In 2008 the Blues wil have the best young list, then a reasonable gap, followed by the Hawks. The Pies are bottom 4 in terms of talent in their younger player group. :)

Collingwood's youngsters have shown a shitload more than than ones at your pathetic rabble. They nearly made a GF this year with the likes of Thomas, Pendlebury, Goldsack, Clarke etc now they have an up an coming ruckman in Wood, plus they have a winning mentality - they actually want to win games.

Now look at Carlton - Murphy is their only youngster that has done anything. They finished 15th, after five years down the bottom.

Kennedy, Russell, Walker, Hartlett, Bentick - the list of Carlton recruiting blunders goes on

Selwood is light years ahead of Gibbs too, Gibbs wouldnt even be top 10 in retrospect. Oh dear. :D
 
Collingwood's youngsters have shown a shitload more than than ones at your pathetic rabble. They nearly made a GF this year with the likes of Thomas, Pendlebury, Goldsack, Clarke etc now they have an up an coming ruckman in Wood, plus they have a winning mentality - they actually want to win games.

Now look at Carlton - Murphy is their only youngster that has done anything. They finished 15th, after five years down the bottom.

Kennedy, Russell, Walker, Hartlett, Bentick - the list of Carlton recruiting blunders goes on

Selwood is light years ahead of Gibbs too, Gibbs wouldnt even be top 10 in retrospect. Oh dear. :D


Don't forget Cloke, along with buddy he is the best young forward in the competition!!!
 
:confused:
The problem the Pies have is that apart from Pendlebury, the rest of their younger player group are middle-of-the-roaders e.g Maxwell, and Shaws are good triers, but mid-to-low-range talent wise. :)

Talent is just a piece of the puzzle, Damian Cupido was talented, completely wasted though.

Collingwood's youngsters are good footballers who play good football as a team.

Carlton youngsters? - they may have been talented in the school boy days or at the draft camp, but the fact is they play for a shit club with a losing cluture. They might have, as you think, all the talent in the world (which they clearly don't) but they are still playing for a shit football club - with a coach who has a 0% winning record. :)
 

Remove this Banner Ad

:confused:

Talent is just a piece of the puzzle, Damian Cupido was talented, completely wasted though.

Collingwood's youngsters are good footballers who play good football as a team.

Carlton youngsters? - they may have been talented in the school boy days or at the draft camp, but the fact is they play for a shit club with a losing cluture. They might have, as you think, all the talent in the world (which they clearly don't) but they are still playing for a shit football club - with a coach who has a 0% winning record. :)

lol. You sound a little insecure. Strange. Cat's supporters have been all over the place announcing that the next 2 flags are in the bag. Why are you so worried about the young Blues? We both know why of course. :)
 
..a poor mans Marc Murphy. Goes at it hard, but not the same poise or talent Murph has. :)

Selwood achievements

1 year
1 premiership
1 Rising star Award

Murphy achievements
...
played in about 3 wins.

Oh, don't forget Hawkins. :thumbsu:

How does it feel that we snagged the standout youngsters and won the flag in the same year? Must feel cheated. You deserve it. :)
 
The best young forward is Josh Kennedy.

Oh wait, no, that changed as soon as he went to West Coast.

Now he's just a dud to Parrot.
 
lol. You sound a little insecure. Strange. Cat's supporters have been all over the place announcing that the next 2 flags are in the bag. Why are you so worried about the young Blues? We both know why of course. :)

Huh? I was happy when Judd chose Carlton ahead of Collingwood because I knew Carlton will not be a threat for a long time.

Carlton are irrelevant. I like pointing that out
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

The best young forward is Josh Kennedy.....

JK has a lot more talent than Cloke. And you know it. Didn't want to see him go, but we've got the best player in the AFL now, who should be a handy addition to our midfield. Oh and BTW, Judd publically rated the talent in our younger player group way above what the Pies have. Was he right? :)
 
JK has a lot more talent than Cloke. And you know it. Didn't want to see him go, but we've got the best player in the AFL now, who should be a handy addition to our midfield. Oh and BTW, Judd publically rated the talent in our younger player group way above what the Pies have. Was he right? :)

Where did Judd do that? Can you show me please?
 
Huh? I was happy when Judd chose Carlton ahead of Collingwood because I knew Carlton will not be a threat for a ...

Nice spin, but you know it ain't true. The Pies were never ever going to be a threat with their mid-to-low-talent level younger player group. The Blues have the best raw talent in the AFL now, and are focusing on flags 17 and 18. Looking forward to our next encounter. :)
 
Nice spin, but you know it ain't true. The Pies were never ever going to be a threat with their mid-to-low-talent level younger player group. The Blues have the best raw talent in the AFL now, and are focusing on flags 17 and 18. Looking forward to our next encounter. :)

Collingwood finished 4th with very little talent
Carlton finished 15th with a lot of talent.

Does anyone else see a slight contradiction?
 
The problem the Pies have is that apart from Pendlebury, the rest of their younger player group are middle-of-the-roaders e.g Maxwell, and Shaws are good triers, but mid-to-low-range talent wise. :)


And to think the blues chose Kennedy ahead of Pendles at number 4, oh dear!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom