Jacobs will win. Danger wasn't so good up until the second half of the season.
[Sando] If Patrick wants the medal, try telling Patrick he can't have the medal[/Sando]
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

BigFooty AFLW Notice Img
AFLW 2025 - AFLW Trade and Draft - All the player moves
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Jacobs will win. Danger wasn't so good up until the second half of the season.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Dangerfield was by far our best player this year and should win the award. We wouldn't be anywhere near finals without him.
Rory Laird dislikes this.
Don't even try denying it, danger was the second best player in the comp this year and played 4 more games than the best.
that is just stupidDangerfield sooked in a number of games. No way is he winning after his performance against Vince. Looking back at games like that, it appears he didn't want to get hurt for us.
Jacobs and Talia held things together all year. I'd be backing Talia in and his role around some very young inexperienced players. Just hope his cats stopped vomiting.
Yep, and the Brownlow.Dont forget votes for the B&F are for how well a players plays their role in a game. It is the one award where pure talent doesnt really come into it .... not too much anyway.
Who can forget Campo blasting Danger on the phone when he decided to do his own thing in the midfield and cost the team. Not an isolated instance either.
I really think Laird deserves to win it. He has been unbelievably good in his role this year.
Is Dangerfield attending the count?
Yep, and the Brownlow.
If he wins both I don't know what I'll think really.Booooooooo. Should be on the "in limbo" table at Brownlow.
Doesn't always work that way though. Talia won it last year even though Sloane was clear our "best player". Remember the Freo game where we all thought VB sucked and then the coaches votes had him as the like the 4th best guy on the ground? Coaches usually go a bit more different with how they vote.Don't even try denying it, danger was the second best player in the comp this year and played 4 more games than the best.
At the very worst it probably helps our position at the trade table. We'd be trading an All-Australian, B&F, Brownlow winner at the peak of his powers.If he wins both I don't know what I'll think really.
Doesn't always work that way though. Talia won it last year even though Sloane was clear our "best player". Remember the Freo game where we all thought VB sucked and then the coaches votes had him as the like the 4th best guy on the ground? Coaches usually go a bit more different with how they vote.
Of course if he doesn't win then the media will run with the conspiracy theory that we altered the votes because we didn't want a departing player winning the B&F, but if Jacobs, Laird or maybe even Betts won it, you can take it as a legitimate win.
At the very worst it probably helps our position at the trade table. We'd be trading an All-Australian, B&F, Brownlow winner at the peak of his powers.
Why?!no way danger winning the best and fairest... they wouldnt let it happen... so betts is as good a chance as any
No one giving Tex a chance at snagging it? As mentioned above, bnf votes aren't just for the best player but based on performing their role, hence how Talia edged out Sloane last year. Wouldn't surprise me to see someone not expected to win, can't see why it wouldn't be Tex, had a very consistent year with a few standout performances on the way.
no way danger winning the best and fairest... they wouldnt let it happen... so betts is as good a chance as any