- Apr 8, 2015
- 17,469
- 9,803
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Thread starter
- #101
only the PFA morons thought so. Token Utd pick.
Lol so right.
To be fair TC's team was pretty good for someone who doesn't follow the PL
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Richmond v Melbourne - 7:25PM Wed
Squiggle tips Demons at 77% chance -- What's your tip? -- Team line-ups »
only the PFA morons thought so. Token Utd pick.
Lol I'm starting to think we might have choked nowTBH make you could have put 7 Spurs players in that team and you wouldn't be being biased. You have arguably the best '11' in the league. Just increase your depth and you'll be pushing for the title next season.
Not even top 4 imo.DDG wasn't even in the top 3 keepers this season.
For me they have had similar level seasons but Toby missed more games. Kos was next in line for me, prob would have shoehorned him in if the formation was 4 at the back.I'm hugely surprised that y'all picking Verts ahead of Toby. Think Koscielny is being overlooked also
Lol come on mate. Sanchez 23 goals and 10 assists and not in TOTY? Really..?
I picked him but can see the argument for him not being in.Lol come on mate. Sanchez 23 goals and 10 assists and not in TOTY? Really..?
Over Kane I'd understand.I picked him but can see the argument for him not being in.
In the PFA 4-4-2 team there's no way he gets in over Lukaku or Kane up front. None at all. Comes down to who you'd prefer out on the left out of Hazard and Sanchez. Line ball in spite of stats
In this front 3 I'd say there's 2 clear ahead of him at CF. Kane and Lukaku. Out on the left it's again line ball between Hazard, Alli and Sanchez.
He's most certainly in the frame and I picked him, but he's not a "lock" imo. He's most certainly up for debate.
So in a 442 he's lineball then (which was the PFA formation).Over Kane I'd understand.
But he is virtually neck and neck with Rom.
It's not that ridiculous when you look at his goal contributionss:Lol at DeBruyne in someone's team. He's had a real down season from his fantastic campaign last season.
I guess. Everytime ive seen him he has been poor this season. I know a few of the City lads have said he has been down on his previous season. Maybe i hold him to too high a bar considering how outstanding he was when he first joined City.It's not that ridiculous when you look at his goal contributionss:
Christian Eriksen - 8 goals 13 assists = 21 involvements and in pretty much everyone's team.
Kevin De Bruyne - 6 goals 16 assists = 22 involvements (from fewer minutes than Eriksen too).
Not that he should be in the XI but I had him in the "unlucky" section, has been one of City's best.
Hazard and alli much betterLol come on mate. Sanchez 23 goals and 10 assists and not in TOTY? Really..?
He hasn't missed two months or played for a non top 6 side. Wouldn't even say he is the most unlucky to miss. Mane deserves to be in there but can't overlook hazard and alli who've done it for the top two sidesOver Kane I'd understand.
But he is virtually neck and neck with Rom.
Gooner hate blinding you mate.Hazard and alli much better
Yeah hard to split Hazard and Sanchez, I agree with the rest of your post.So in a 442 he's lineball then (which was the PFA formation).
Surely in a 343 he's not that much better than Hazard that it isn't worth being debatable?
Mane carried Liverpool's front line just as admirably as Sanchez did. Just not as long due to injury.
Just like at centrehalf where you could throw a blanket over about 5 players, you can here too imo.
"much better" is a massive overstatement, pretty close all 3 of them.Hazard and alli much better
Alli and Eriksen very often rotate between left and centralGooner hate blinding you mate.
And Alli ain't a LW
Yeah hard to split Hazard and Sanchez, I agree with the rest of your post.
Even Son (Lamela) when playing 3 AM's. Very fluid.Alli and Eriksen very often rotate between left and central