Blue murder

[*PAF]

Posters on here keep saying how they have been banned from the Port board.
My understanding is that very very very few have, albeit some have been banned a number of times using multiple user names.
Overall though, probably less than have been banned on this board.

Perhaps I am wrong, but it is easy to get to the truth.

If you have been banned say "I".

By the way Jack, you only need to say I once.

 

[Cove Cobra]

Oops sorry, I thought this thread was about Carlton.

 

[Damp Squarie]

Im surprised you havent been banned from the Pork board for being a crow sympathiser
Lets face it, you have more shots at goal on this board than Tredrea has all season

 

[jmorg1]

What's it going to take to get me unbanned?

 

[Damp Squarie]

A packet o Rothmans and a sweet cherry goon

 

[noddy]

Hand go's slowly up toward the sky.

 

[*PAF]

Im surprised you havent been banned from the Pork board for being a crow sympathiser
Lets face it, you have more shots at goal on this board than Tredrea has all season

I'm usually a better shot though.


I think I am fighting a losing battle on both boards though.

Personally I would not tolerate personal abuse and "one topic ponies" that usually hijack threads from no matter what they were about to their personal "fancy". Everything else would be fair game.
I actually think the mods on here and on the Port board could get even stricter when it comes to those two things.

But alas both boards will eventually become insular and this one will have threads turn into anti Port ones on an even more regular basis.
I started a couple of these "stupid topic" threads myself last week to show just how stupid they really were, but the point got missed by most with mine being deleted but the original ones still going strong.

Ah well, if that's the way most want it to be (on both boards) then so be it. Again IMO

 

[sapaul]

Never been banned from the Port board, just bigfooty altogether.

 

[Crow-mosone]

Hand go's slowly up toward the sky.

you're joking right?

 

[Mr Magoo]

What's it going to take to get me unbanned?

An act of god & then a few dates with your sister if she's really hot.

 

[CaptainDangerfield]

Hand go's slowly up toward the sky.

Now this says it all. You can understand others being banned, myself inlcuded, but Noddy, c'mon.

 

[Markthirtytwo]

Hand go's slowly up toward the sky.

But did it go all the way?

 

[Kane McGoodwin]

I'm usually a better shot though.


I think I am fighting a losing battle on both boards though.

Personally I would not tolerate personal abuse and "one topic ponies" that usually hijack threads from no matter what they were about to their personal "fancy". Everything else would be fair game.
I actually think the mods on here and on the Port board could get even stricter when it comes to those two things.

But alas both boards will eventually become insular and this one will have threads turn into anti Port ones on an even more regular basis.
I started a couple of these "stupid topic" threads myself last week to show just how stupid they really were, but the point got missed by most with mine being deleted but the original ones still going strong.

Ah well, if that's the way most want it to be (on both boards) then so be it. Again IMO

It's the stupid irrelevant threads that I have been deleting / locking. I know it is off-season, but try & keep the threads with at least some interest to the Adelaie Board. ie. I don't have an issue with friendly banter (as long as it doesn't turn into over-the-top personal abuse), but some of the stuff posted has been complete irrelevant rubbish.

PS. I haven't been banned, but just had all my posts one day deleted on the teal board ... but that's in the past.

 

[outback jack]

*PAF's post

once again bit over dramatic *PAF. Those threads were rubbish, you were being a pain they had to go, even the ones from crows supporters were main board stuff. The difference is if threads of a similar nature were made on your board the poster would be taking a holiday from the board too. Your normal posts/threads arent altered. A change happened on the port board when this season started, you were all good fun then the season to most supporters shock went wrong and some had bitten off more than they could chew . There was a definite change. I never minded port supporters before that. The different agendas came out when things werent going smoothly. Toots_hibbert was a example of this, i used to think he was good fun, but really he is just jealous of us.

Anyway, my favourite quote from the thread port board about this was:

'we are no different to any other board, but we just cant work out why no one posts here.'*

They seem to be trying to reassure each other, brings a tear to my eye almost.

 

[Mad Dog]

*PAF you are always welcome here as long as you have nice things to say about our fantastic club.

I agree that there is much to be learned and enjoyed from sharing thoughts and opinions from all walks of life...even you lot. I definately enjoy discussion on topics where we can find common ground - even if it's only on 1% of the issues. Off season is a time where we "come out of the trenches" so to speak....have a chat, smoke, drink, share old army stories...then get back in the trenches in late March ready to blow each others heads off again.

I certainly don't support petty bans from either side and would discourage petty personal abuse from anyone....unless it's called for..

So - I agree with your sentiments *PAF....now get your ****ing maggoty ****** ing arse back to the Port board where you belong....

ps - the only board I came close to getting banned from was the Richmond Board - and all I said was their club was a bunch of losers and that I felt sorry for Kane Johnson having to be captain of a stinking rabble like that. Got a please explain from the Mods. Touchy lot over there...

pps only joshing with ya *PAF

 

[*PAF]

... more Jack stuff ...

Bullcrap Jack. I'm just posting what a lot of others are thinking.

Also wrt noddy if it's the time I'm thinking of it did cause a bit of commotion on our board and we ended up having one of "these" discussions over it. Then again that big eared fella is a pest in various parts of the world.

So apart from noddy, jmorg1 (nuf said) and various Jacks (nuff said) not too many more have had holidays.
Lots of cries of blue murder but not much substance behind it hey?

 

[outback jack]

Bullcrap Jack. I'm just posting what a lot of others are thinking.

Also wrt noddy if it's the time I'm thinking of it did cause a bit of commotion on our board and we ended up having one of "these" discussions over it. Then again that big eared fella is a pest in various parts of the world.

So apart from noddy, jmorg1 (nuf said) and various Jacks (nuff said) not too many more have had holidays.
Lots of cries of blue murder but not much substance behind it hey?

i think there are others, springy, maccas_no1, chinaman, jumping_jimmy, me theres 4-5, not 2. If noddy was banned its quite funny actually. Its the general pouncing on anything slightly borderline though that does it. I've told DK but he assures me you are growing at a normal rate, regardless of outside input, so he must be right.

i think you took offense cause how i quoted you, unfortunately bigfooty doesnt seem to accept long posts from me from this computer for some reason so thats the only reason. Other than that cant see what your actual point was to be totally honest. Port v crows boards are very different, you can feel the love here. You don’t get anything deleted here normally. I am actually a naive victim of the port board, but we’ll leave that for another time.

 

[portentous]

How many Port posters have been banned from the Adelaide board? And why aren't I one of them??

Seriously though, how did Noddy get banned? Is that cousin of yours causing trouble again noddy?

The only place I've been banned from, that I know of, is a Port site. Come close on MANY other occasions at other places though I suspect. Now I'm just trying to be a "good" girl, but sometimes it's much more fun to be "bad"!

I don't have a problem with how either board is moderated as they are those club's boards. I've been REALLY unimpressed with the AFL forum though. Some threads should simply be locked, or deleted, much sooner. Too much "same old, same old" there for my liking. Oh, and some people take things far too seriously.

 

[Markthirtytwo]

I am actually a naive victim of the port board, but we’ll leave that for another time.

Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha, shock horror, its an Oxy Moron.

 

[Toots Hibbert]

i think there are others, springy, maccas_no1, chinaman, jumping_jimmy, me theres 4-5, not 2......

.....I am actually a naive victim of the port board, but we’ll leave that for another time.

I think this is an indication that you have a high External Locus of Control, Jack. You attribute bad things that happen to you to powerful external forces rather than taking responsibility for your own actions.

For instance when your posts are deleted you attribute this to the work of the mythical Port Big Footy Gang. When you are banned from a board or BF altogether it's due to mods being unfair. When Crows fans get irritated with you it's them being arrogant MBA's or stuck up would be journos. When you get caught out claiming to have just logged on after posting 50 times in 12 hours it's the fact that you are being stalked rather than that you have spent a year seeking every possible opportunity to get up Port people's noses and that therefore when they see an opportunity they give you a good kicking.

BTW the Chinaman wasn't banned from the Port board. He was banned from BigFooty. As you were in cahoots at the time he escalated into telling others what sexual exploits he was performing with their mothers and sisters, you should be well aware that his banning was inevitable. If you can't see that then it's further evidence of your external locus of control. More likely though is that you will make up anything just to keep an argument going.

For my own part I've done some sh*t stirring this year mixed in with more serious posting but if you can't understand that the airport stuff for instance was written in mock outrage then you have a problem. If you look back over the year you'll find that for most of it I wasn't present on this board and that I've been supportive of Andrew McLeod all year, on this board, the Port board and the main board. When Pickett was an issue I had the same position that most of us had that he had done wrong but the punishment was too harsh. I enjoyed some of the responses in the Tredrea and Pickett threads I started because they were clever attempts to subvert what the thread was for.

Because I have a high internal locus of control I recognise that by responding to you as I've done recently people are likely to forget that for most of the year I ignored your nonsense. That's my choice. You need to understand that when you spout rubbish people may laugh and enjoy the trouble you cause. It's just that most of the time they are not laughing with you.

 

[Pafloyul]

Speaking of user-names, mine often get's shortened to Paf so who is ripping-off who?

 

[arrowman]

Off season is a time where we "come out of the trenches" so to speak....have a chat, smoke, drink, share old army stories...then get back in the trenches in late March ready to blow each others heads off again.

Well put!

 

[GoSarge]

I think this is an indication that you have a high External Locus of Control, Jack. You attribute bad things that happen to you to powerful external forces rather than taking responsibility for your own actions.

For instance when your posts are deleted you attribute this to the work of the mythical Port Big Footy Gang. When you are banned from a board or BF altogether it's due to mods being unfair. When Crows fans get irritated with you it's them being arrogant MBA's or stuck up would be journos. When you get caught out claiming to have just logged on after posting 50 times in 12 hours it's the fact that you are being stalked rather than that you have spent a year seeking every possible opportunity to get up Port people's noses and that therefore when they see an opportunity they give you a good kicking.

BTW the Chinaman wasn't banned from the Port board. He was banned from BigFooty and as you were in cahoots at the time he escalated into telling others what sexual exploits he was performing with their mothers and sisters you should be well aware that his banning was inevitable. If you can't see that then it's further evidence of your external locus of control. More likely though is that you will make up anything just to keep an argument going.

For my own part I've done some sh*t stirring this year mixed in with more serious posting but if you can't understand that the airport stuff for instance was written in mock outrage then you have a problem. If you look back over the year you'll find that for most of it I wasn't present on this board and that I've been supportive of Andrew McLeod all year, on this board, the Port board and the main board. When Pickett was an issue I had the same position that most of us had that he had done wrong but the punishment was too harsh. I enjoyed some of the responses in the Tredrea and Pickett threads I started because they were clever attempts to subvert what the thread was for.

Because I have a high internal locus of control I recognise that by responding to you as I've done recently people are likely to forget that for most of the year I ignored your nonsense. That's my choice. You need to understand that when you spout rubbish people may laugh and enjoy the trouble you cause. It's just that most of the time they are not laughing with you.

Some people would pay a shrink a couple of hundred dollars an hour for that kind of advice.

 

[Mad Dog]

I think this is an indication that you have a high External Locus of Control, Jack. You attribute bad things that happen to you to powerful external forces rather than taking responsibility for your own actions.

For instance when your posts are deleted you attribute this to the work of the mythical Port Big Footy Gang. When you are banned from a board or BF altogether it's due to mods being unfair. When Crows fans get irritated with you it's them being arrogant MBA's or stuck up would be journos. When you get caught out claiming to have just logged on after posting 50 times in 12 hours it's the fact that you are being stalked rather than that you have spent a year seeking every possible opportunity to get up Port people's noses and that therefore when they see an opportunity they give you a good kicking.

BTW the Chinaman wasn't banned from the Port board. He was banned from BigFooty. As you were in cahoots at the time he escalated into telling others what sexual exploits he was performing with their mothers and sisters, you should be well aware that his banning was inevitable. If you can't see that then it's further evidence of your external locus of control. More likely though is that you will make up anything just to keep an argument going.

For my own part I've done some sh*t stirring this year mixed in with more serious posting but if you can't understand that the airport stuff for instance was written in mock outrage then you have a problem. If you look back over the year you'll find that for most of it I wasn't present on this board and that I've been supportive of Andrew McLeod all year, on this board, the Port board and the main board. When Pickett was an issue I had the same position that most of us had that he had done wrong but the punishment was too harsh. I enjoyed some of the responses in the Tredrea and Pickett threads I started because they were clever attempts to subvert what the thread was for.

Because I have a high internal locus of control I recognise that by responding to you as I've done recently people are likely to forget that for most of the year I ignored your nonsense. That's my choice. You need to understand that when you spout rubbish people may laugh and enjoy the trouble you cause. It's just that most of the time they are not laughing with you.

Here Here - and I would just like to add that most locusts I've come across are usually completely out of control and play havoc with the cooling system in the car, especially when driving at night.

 

[outback jack]

I think this is an indication that you have a high External Locus of Control, Jack. You attribute bad things that happen to you to powerful external forces rather than taking responsibility for your own actions.

For instance when your posts are deleted you attribute this to the work of the mythical Port Big Footy Gang. When you are banned from a board or BF altogether it's due to mods being unfair. When Crows fans get irritated with you it's them being arrogant MBA's or stuck up would be journos. When you get caught out claiming to have just logged on after posting 50 times in 12 hours it's the fact that you are being stalked rather than that you have spent a year seeking every possible opportunity to get up Port people's noses and that therefore when they see an opportunity they give you a good kicking.

BTW the Chinaman wasn't banned from the Port board. He was banned from BigFooty. As you were in cahoots at the time he escalated into telling others what sexual exploits he was performing with their mothers and sisters, you should be well aware that his banning was inevitable. If you can't see that then it's further evidence of your external locus of control. More likely though is that you will make up anything just to keep an argument going.

For my own part I've done some sh*t stirring this year mixed in with more serious posting but if you can't understand that the airport stuff for instance was written in mock outrage then you have a problem. If you look back over the year you'll find that for most of it I wasn't present on this board and that I've been supportive of Andrew McLeod all year, on this board, the Port board and the main board. When Pickett was an issue I had the same position that most of us had that he had done wrong but the punishment was too harsh. I enjoyed some of the responses in the Tredrea and Pickett threads I started because they were clever attempts to subvert what the thread was for.

Because I have a high internal locus of control I recognise that by responding to you as I've done recently people are likely to forget that for most of the year I ignored your nonsense. That's my choice. You need to understand that when you spout rubbish people may laugh and enjoy the trouble you cause. It's just that most of the time they are not laughing with you.

Thats a bitter response toots and factually incorrect too. You've said a few times on the main board that the majority of adelaide board respects your opinion and finds you funny, plz show me the posters who feel this way. i must say for this high internal locus control you claim to have, you havent been displaying too much of that on the main board recently, if at all really. You werent that bad though, dont worry. Well thats not true, you were, but i wont tell anyone.

I had good fun atleast, going by this not sure you did though. Keep trying with Rory's help you'll be ok.