Remove this Banner Ad

Rumour Bluemour Discussion XLI

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Our midfield is still the same core. No improvement from those trades.

The clubs stance was that we wanted an A grade player if we were to trade Charlie. A player with 4 years remaining on his contract and we traded him to the club of his choice. Why? Which A grader did we end up with?
Leek Aleer was gettable and would of slotted in perfectly with Weitering instead of using a future second on Ainsworth.
We couldn't even get Khamis deal over the line.
We traded away alot of future picks too. Next year we only have our first rounder and Sydney's first which highly likely will need to be used to match Cody Walker. Our next pick is 4th round.

Cmon Opium, look at the whole picture

Charlie had to go. Culture and SC pressure and we effectively replaced him with 2 best 23 players and three first round picks. For a 29 year old

Pick 11 (maybe with 9)could easily get us another gun mid
Jagga is back
Walker next year we have now secured without having to do anything else
Walsh will hopefully be fit
Ben Campo coming through
Massive wraps on Ison
Moir looking to build in the middle

This on top of Cripps Hewett Lord & Cerra

Now supported by genuine outside run in Florent Cheser Wilson and more

Aleer was never an option
Ainsworth fills a need and was cheap

And we haven’t finished yet and haven’t blown money or picks on the quick fixes that have failed before
 
If 2025 Petracca is worth 3-4 1st rounders, Butters is worth at least that if not more.

The market has gone a bit stupid, and GC not needing 1st round picks to get 1st round academy players (and the consistent numbers at which they get them each year) throws the economy out completely.
Petracca was a contracted player, Butters wont be, its a really big difference.
 
Has anyone done a calculation on the total price GC paid for Petracca? It would be good to know for reference

I’ve done a quick break down and projection using ChatGPT and it works out to be equivalent of pick 1
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

That's culture and leadership. Jack Silvagni is a player who wants to win at all costs. For him to jump ship confirms the club is in a massive hole and he couldn't see anything to indicate its changing anytime soon.

I agree. Jack left because of frustration. Culture was bad

However, Wright has come in, admitted to issues and is addressing them. Look at changes to coaching , development and our new HOF

I see significant changes happening. At the moment I couldn’t ask for anything more

As you said, time will tell, but things are definitely happening
 
I agree. Jack left because of frustration. Culture was bad

However, Wright has come in, admitted to issues and is addressing them. Look at changes to coaching , development and our new HOF

I see significant changes happening. At the moment I couldn’t ask for anything more

As you said, time will tell, but things are definitely happening

Jack left for the money.

Period.

Let’s see how committed he is per game at 50% fit next year in the middle of winter.
 
Cmon Opium, look at the whole picture

Charlie had to go. Culture and SC pressure and we effectively replaced him with 2 best 23 players and three first round picks. For a 29 year old

Pick 11 (maybe with 9)could easily get us another gun mid
Jagga is back
Walker next year we have now secured without having to do anything else
Walsh will hopefully be fit
Ben Campo coming through
Massive wraps on Ison
Moir looking to build in the middle

This on top of Cripps Hewett Lord & Cerra

Now supported by genuine outside run in Florent Cheser Wilson and more

Aleer was never an option
Ainsworth fills a need and was cheap

And we haven’t finished yet and haven’t blown money or picks on the quick fixes that have failed before
You can be as rational as you like, but some people are never going to acknowledge anything positive, no matter what happens. That can be seen by looking at the last few pages in this thread.

I think we had a very good trade period and, even more importantly, the off-field additions seem to be of real quality. I'm confident that we're heading in the right direction.
 
That's culture and leadership. Jack Silvagni is a player who wants to win at all costs. For him to jump ship confirms the club is in a massive hole and he couldn't see anything to indicate its changing anytime soon.
Interesting choice of clubs to go to if he’s driven by winning at all costs. I’d say he might driven by other factors, such as money.
 
Jack left for the money.

Period.

Let’s see how committed he is per game at 50% fit next year in the middle of winter.

Not originally. Deals with Pies & Dogs were same as ours. We actually upped our offer. Then Saints came in with ridiculous deal. Then I believe it became about money
 
Jack left for the money.

Period.

Let’s see how committed he is per game at 50% fit next year in the middle of winter.
Jack left because he knew with HOF and then. Dean coming in his time was limited.

When HOF did his ACL he considered staying but by then he knew.
 
Not originally. Deals with Pies & Dogs were same as ours. We actually upped our offer. Then Saints came in with ridiculous deal. Then I believe it became about money

I heard Stephen Silvagni had never met Ross Lyon until 3 weeks ago on a double decker bus, where Ross played some Eddie Cochrane on his 5 string guitar, & was allowed to join his skiffle band.

Come on man.
 
Cmon Opium, look at the whole picture

Charlie had to go. Culture and SC pressure and we effectively replaced him with 2 best 23 players and three first round picks. For a 29 year old

Pick 11 (maybe with 9)could easily get us another gun mid
Jagga is back
Walker next year we have now secured without having to do anything else
Walsh will hopefully be fit
Ben Campo coming through
Massive wraps on Ison
Moir looking to build in the middle

This on top of Cripps Hewett Lord & Cerra

Now supported by genuine outside run in Florent Cheser Wilson and more

Aleer was never an option
Ainsworth fills a need and was cheap

And we haven’t finished yet and haven’t blown money or picks on the quick fixes that have failed before
SC pressure was relieved with TDK @ slightly less with JSOS’s new budgeted salary.

CC’s deal was pretty good for us, unless the output was in the same vein as ‘25.
 
Last edited:

Remove this Banner Ad

Tbh I'd love to see Elijah spend the year in the VFL for us if he's truly dedicated to making things right.

Get right in the head and show us a year of dedication and consistency and we'll have a look at you in 12 months time.

That is if nobody else wants to take him.
Move him to the rookie list.
 
Walker next year we have now secured without having to do anything else

Just on this... let's hope so...

The amateurs still haven't released anything concrete about what will be required to match bids next year.

Bloody joke really. Take us as a prime example, we've set ourselves up to spend 2 first round picks on him. That's more than fair...

But if they only allow two picks to match, remove discounts and the bid comes in at #1... we're still not matching unless we finish in the bottom 4... even then, we have to hope that one of the teams below us don't get another band 1 compo...

3000 points is a nightmare to make up for with 2 picks alone. You'd need pick 5 and 11...

Even with the discount, 2700 is still bloody tough... pick 6 + 13...
 
Has anyone done a calculation on the total price GC paid for Petracca? It would be good to know for reference

I’ve done a quick break down and projection using ChatGPT and it works out to be equivalent of pick 1

Yeah because they don't care about burning picks so long as they can match their academy players...

7+8 were always going to be put toward paying for them anyway. It was essentially a free hit.

If Trac didn't choose GC, they might've been a contender for Charlie and we would've got the same I'd imagine.
 
Just on this... let's hope so...

The amateurs still haven't released anything concrete about what will be required to match bids next year.

Bloody joke really. Take us as a prime example, we've set ourselves up to spend 2 first round picks on him. That's more than fair...

But if they only allow two picks to match, remove discounts and the bid comes in at #1... we're still not matching unless we finish in the bottom 4... even then, we have to hope that one of the teams below us don't get another band 1 compo...

3000 points is a nightmare to make up for with 2 picks alone. You'd need pick 5 and 11...

Even with the discount, 2700 is still bloody tough... pick 6 + 13...
Unbelievable really.

Take out band 1 compo however being until pick#11 as another mooted change.
Affects us on SW if he departs under FA (which would have to be matched).
 
Unbelievable really.

Take out band 1 compo however being until pick#11 as another mooted change.
Affects us on SW if he departs under FA (which would have to be matched).

Not really... even if it is pick 11 onward... that would push our hypothetical 5 + 11 to 5 + 12... not enough to match...

Even if it pushes that hypothetical 6 + 13 required after discount... 13 becomes 14.. not enough.
 
Not really... even if it is pick 11 onward... that would push our hypothetical 5 + 11 to 5 + 12... not enough to match...

Even if it pushes that hypothetical 6 + 13 required after discount... 13 becomes 14.. not enough.
Thought it was based on bottom 4..?

“But if they only allow two picks to match, remove discounts and the bid comes in at #1... we're still not matching unless we finish in the bottom 4... even then, we have to hope that one of the teams below us don't get another band 1 compo...”

They’d need to take out any compo picks from being counted in the points index
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Our biggest issue this year was utterly putrid outside run and ball use. We added 4 players who provide that and look likely to add 2-3 more in the draft.

What else were you expecting from us?
And attitude/ commitment/ professionalism. As far as anyone can tell. That's supposedly been heavily addressed too.
 
Our midfield is still the same core. No improvement from those trades.

The clubs stance was that we wanted an A grade player if we were to trade Charlie. A player with 4 years remaining on his contract and we traded him to the club of his choice. Why? Which A grader did we end up with?
Leek Aleer was gettable and would of slotted in perfectly with Weitering instead of using a future second on Ainsworth.
We couldn't even get Khamis deal over the line.
We traded away alot of future picks too. Next year we only have our first rounder and Sydney's first which highly likely will need to be used to match Cody Walker. Our next pick is 4th round.
Hayward is A grade at his role. Aleer is actually not a good footballer and makes up for it with athletic ability. And wants half the cap in pay.
 
Thought it was based on bottom 4..?

“But if they only allow two picks to match, remove discounts and the bid comes in at #1... we're still not matching unless we finish in the bottom 4... even then, we have to hope that one of the teams below us don't get another band 1 compo...”

They’d need to take out any compo picks from being counted in the points index

If we finish bottom 4, we're still reliant on Sydney finishing low enough to get us the pick we need.

That's why I've been saying the two picks only match is nonsense.
 
I think he can push forward at times and be a bit of a difference

Issue is with Cripps he needs to be fully fit or he can be a liability. Personally, I would try and play him 15-16 games a year with some breaks in between to stay fresh and recover from all the knocks he gets. A fully fit Cripps for 15 games is a lot better than a 80% fit Cripps for 23 games IMO. He's bull and that's it
I'd say play Cripps and Lord together as our extractors, then for the games when we rest Cripps, play B. Campo off the bench and make Hewett and Lord the main mids. In the 15-16 games we play Cripps, give him 75% mid time and 25% forward time when he's on the ground. If we can find a way not to continue to let Cripps get beat up, we might extend his career by a year or two. Wins all round for Carlton.
 
Hayward is A grade at his role. Aleer is actually not a good footballer and makes up for it with athletic ability. And wants half the cap in pay.
Not sure Aleer chased the big bucks but was approached by a club who was offering absurd money which couldn’t be denied in accepting (until STK did the dirty on him and withdrew their offer).
 
Dunno what side you guys are watching.

A 90% fit Sam Walsh makes us 3 goals better.

He’s played 3/4 of the most outstanding individual quarters as Cripps/Judd.

Get this boy anywhere near 3/4 pump & he will smack sides.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom