Why do the so called progressives always sound like nasty shitty little authoritarians?
because they’ve watched too many of Dictator Dan’s indoctrination sessions





Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Why do the so called progressives always sound like nasty shitty little authoritarians?





That’s awesome. Did you conduct the research yourself?The demographics of the currently unvaccinated.
Un-vaccinated people both endanger those who cannot get vaccinated for legitimate reasons, such as being immune-compromised or too young, and they provide a population where the virus can survive and mutate within, leading to variants which can then affect those who are vaccinated.
Social media has done one thing, allowed the vocal minority a space where they can find like-minded people and amplify their opinions. Conspericy theories like the anti-vax movements are the outcome of such situations .........
You can’t catch and pass on “fat”.All of those are stopping you doing something. None are forcing you to do something.
We don't mandate fat people eat vegetables - and last i checked heart disease will kill more people than COVID ever will.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Doors were open until late Nov 24 then its a fresh official exemption every few months if you want to live a normal life
Do you mandate that of fat people eating burgers? Don't call an ambulance if you are having a heart attack?
What about the ambulance at footy grounds? sorry mate - you broke your leg - but you took unneccessary risks playing a combat sport.
I might believe that if so many of these progressives weren't Dan Andrews bootlickers in Victoria.
They are angrier at a few anti-vaxxers than they are of a lying corrupt Premier whose actions lead to the death of hundreds of people.
That's a prime example of people dying needlessly on a large scale.
Research in England and in The Netherlands has also shown that an un-vaccinated person is no greater threat than a vaccinated person in passing on the virus to other people. I’ve had my jabs so it makes absolutely no difference to me whether the person next to me has been vaxed or not.
That assumes that those immuno compromised people won't die of the common cold, flu, bronchitis already right?
At our current vaccination rate - deaths from COVID will be less than from other infectious respiratory disease.
Or do we not care about immune compromised people dying of bronchitis and pneumonia?
What's his good reason?sit on your high horse and call someone you’ve never met before pathetic. Maybe he has a good reason. Perhaps you are the pathetic one ?
I get that - although I guess my analogy is more directed at those who refuse the vaccine because they don't like the government telling them what to do.Fair cop - but a seat belt is different to permanent medical treatment though.
There is one thing no one ever has an answer for - what is the long (or medium) term safety of the vaccine?
That one stumps everyone.
For me the unknown risk was inconsequential to the risk of COVID - it's why i got vaccinated. But it is a valid concern.
You win oh brave Knight of the Steak.even figuratively
The 'vaccine mandate' isn't forcing you to do something either. Imposing restrictions on you for not doing something is not the same as forcing you to do it.All of those are stopping you doing something. None are forcing you to do something.
We don't mandate fat people eat vegetables - and last i checked heart disease will kill more people than COVID ever will.
No one is blaming people with a medical exemption like yourself.Hmmm you can go outside cross the road and get hit by a bus....
There are risks in all aspects of life. Personally I'm fine with living my life as normal with "the fleeting beast" (Brett Duttons words) lurking around the corner, thats an acceptable risk in my eyes.
Getting an injection that will harm me if I did get it, is an unacceptable risk for myself. Hence why I have an exemption (which I haven't even needed to show to many people anyway lol).
Nice. Another science denier, who somehow thinks he's smarter than every doctor and scientist in every country around the globe.Why are you calling people who don’t want an pharmaceutical product without full approval they don’t need morons?
I won’t question your understanding of this, particularly your point on how long one is contagious for, mainly because I just don’t know whether this is accurate or not.No the research says that the both have the same viral load at peak, BUT (and this is the clear distinction) that vaccinated people clear it out of the system quicker.
So if you are contagious for 2 days approx when you are vaccinated, compared to 5-9 days approx for someone unvaccinated, who is the more likely based on that stat alone to spread the virus?
And good that you had your jab, but there are genuinely immunocomprimised people who can't get the jab, and then have to hope the anti-vaxx community don't go out in big numbers and cause a super spreader event like they did at the Melbourne protest.
And COVID is killing a lot more than what the vaccine is. For people without a previous reaction to a vaccine, the vaccine is way safer.
It's playing Russian roulette if there were no bullets in the gun.I still think the injection is akin to playing russian roulette, while I know the same can be said for running the gauntlet with the virus itself.
You can still get an adverse reaction to the vaccine even without pre existing conditions.
The difference is with COVID the gun is significantly more loaded than with the vaccine.I still think the injection is akin to playing russian roulette, while I know the same can be said for running the gauntlet with the virus itself.
You can still get an adverse reaction to the vaccine even without pre existing conditions.
It's a great example of the cultural problems at Carlton.
you sound like youve done your own researchI still think the injection is akin to playing russian roulette, while I know the same can be said for running the gauntlet with the virus itself.
You can still get an adverse reaction to the vaccine even without pre existing conditions.
We use the benefits and discoveries of science all the time.'Science' is no more than a method of inquiry and is the new religion. 'Science denier' is the new 'god denier'. It is not 'stupid' to question said method when it has proven incredibly fallible, especially historically.
And you seem to be asserting that said method is not only infallible, but is not a method but rather an objective state of knowledge - which is not true. Thousands of 'doctors' and 'scientists' do not support blanket medical treatment for people who do not need to be vaccinated.
It's a great example of the cultural problems at Carlton.
Someone cares more about their own fears from reading posts on Facebook than they do for how they could help protect a champion of the club by getting a shot.
Nah, that's just rubbish.It's a great example of the cultural problems at Carlton.
Someone cares more about their own fears from reading posts on Facebook than they do for how they could help protect a champion of the club by getting a shot.