ferrisb
Brownlow Medallist
- Joined
- May 22, 2011
- Posts
- 26,554
- Reaction score
- 152,841
- Location
- The Naughty Corner
- AFL Club
- Carlton
The theory goes that when Judd retires, our premiership window closes.
The guy is a champion and I want to see him play for a few more years, but I don’t see his retirement as being that significant.
Surely once he retires, a ~700k gap opens up in our salary cap and we can afford to ‘replace’ him via salary cap. Free agency means it only takes money, not players to bring players across.
When you lose a player to injury, you lose that player’s contribution but you are still paying him. Lose a player to retirement, you lose his contribution BUT you have more money in the kitty.
In my mind, no one is truly irreplaceable unless they are performing MASSIVELY above their salary. Such as a player that joins or stays for less than market value in order to chase premiership glory or a veteran that you are paying less than market value due to salary cap discount.
Am I way off base here? Should I be more worried than I am?
Discuss.
The guy is a champion and I want to see him play for a few more years, but I don’t see his retirement as being that significant.
Surely once he retires, a ~700k gap opens up in our salary cap and we can afford to ‘replace’ him via salary cap. Free agency means it only takes money, not players to bring players across.
When you lose a player to injury, you lose that player’s contribution but you are still paying him. Lose a player to retirement, you lose his contribution BUT you have more money in the kitty.
In my mind, no one is truly irreplaceable unless they are performing MASSIVELY above their salary. Such as a player that joins or stays for less than market value in order to chase premiership glory or a veteran that you are paying less than market value due to salary cap discount.
Am I way off base here? Should I be more worried than I am?
Discuss.







