Remove this Banner Ad

Hot Topic CARLTON SUPPORTERS ONLY - Carlton fires Captain Carlton

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.


This thread is for the discussion of the sacking of a club mascot after refusing to participate in a bar mitzvah which was allegedly sending money back to the IDF.

By taking this position and labelling the act racist, the club has taken a position on the Israel-Palestine conflict.

This thread concerns a discussion of the following:
  • whether it is acceptable for the club to fire someone for taking a political stance.
  • whether it is a good idea for the club to have taken a public position on this issue.

This thread is not a thread in which you should partake in expressing your political beliefs concerning the conflict, nor is it somewhere in which forum rules do not apply.

Should you seek to participate in conversation related to the war, you can do so here:

There's also a thread on the SRP for a more robust discussion than can be permitted here:


If you wish to participate in this thread, do so knowing that this will not be allowed to escalate beyond a point.

Thanks all!
 
Last edited:
Hasn’t been a country full of Jews or zionists who committed one either
And there you have it.

Denial that there is even a valid political stance to take.
 
what is the population of Gaza pre-7th October 2023 and what is its current population?
Grew about 500k, 10% exceeding the less than 1% world population growth in the same time.

Mod Edit: this post is misinformative.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
If he said Zio, then it’s worth noting that it’s an anti-semitic slur coined by the KKK that’s linked to the Protocols of Zion.

Zionism isn’t a race. It’s a form of secular nationalism. The majority of Jewish people are Zionists. Most Australian Jews are Zionist. I’m not saying there aren’t anti-Zionist Jews. There absolutely are. They are a minority though.

But even with that Zionism comes in multiple flavours, like all forms of nationalism. There’s secular and religious Zionism. There aes two state solution Zionists. Right of return Zionist and genocidal Zionists. Because every group has horrible people. Including yours.

As for Captain Carlton, if he did say Zio then that’s a deal breaker for me.
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

There has also never been a "genocide" where the other side can stop it immediately by releasing all hostages and committing to a ceasefire.
And when it stops, let us know.
 
You described it as a genocide

I disagreed

And then you accuse me of denying your valid political stance because I don’t agree it’s a genocide
No I was referring to the sticky above.

"whether it is acceptable for the club to fire someone for taking a political stance."

Denying it is even a political stance by denying the genocide. Therefore it must have been something else. Which makes the sacking justified.

That's all.
 
This issue can be discussed, but only where the club is concerned. Anything else can be taken to the main board thread or SRP. I shouldn't have to keep reminding people.

If we wake up tomorrow to more of the same, and have to clean it up, we won't be as charitable.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

If he said Zio, then it’s worth noting that it’s an anti-semitic slur coined by the KKK that’s linked to the Protocols of Zion.

I do not know the mind of Captain Carlton, but I would wager that "****ing Zios" had precisely zero to do with the KKK or Protocols of Zion, and was just a shortening of 'zionists'
 
Im sorry but there are many posts in this thread purtaining to the conflict in Gaza that are politically motivated and have remained on here..
The issue being discussed is should the Club sack an employee for bringing the club into disrepute.
 
Im sorry but there are many posts in this thread purtaining to the conflict in Gaza that are politically motivated and have remained on here..
The issue being discussed is should the Club sack an employee for bringing the club into disrepute.

I think the issue is the parameters here are perilously difficult to navigate without talking about the conflict.

Take the issue as you've defined it here: a purely bipartisan stance would make CC sackable on either side; he is either storming out on a club obligation or party to fundraising for a regime whose actions have been repeatedly condemned by the Australian government. A complete lose-lose situation which the club is responsible for.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

I think the issue is the parameters here are perilously difficult to navigate without talking about the conflict.

Take the issue as you've defined it here: a purely bipartisan stance would make CC sackable on either side; he is either storming out on a club obligation or party to fundraising for a regime whose actions have been repeatedly condemned by the Australian government. A complete lose-lose situation which the club is responsible for.
i disagree completely and utterly. This can be discussed completely without the conflict. It is completely irrelevant to the behaviour reported.
 
Care to entertain the second half of my post?
you and others presume that there is fundraising for the IDF when it has been reported that money will be given to wounded soldiers. That is completely different situations or circumstances. One suggests military aid the other humanitarian aid.
Irrespective of the destination it is up to the child do decide where he spends his money not CC.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
you and others presume that there is fundraising for the IDF when it has been reported that money will be given to wounded soldiers. That is completely different situations or circumstances. One suggests military aid the other humanitarian aid.
Irrespective of the destination it is up to the child do decide where he spends his money not CC.

Wounded soldiers who would be under the care and thus financial strains of... the IDF. Surely you can piece together the issue here.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Hot Topic CARLTON SUPPORTERS ONLY - Carlton fires Captain Carlton

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top