- Joined
- Mar 3, 2008
- Posts
- 17,086
- Reaction score
- 7,177
- Location
- Perth
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Other Teams
- Chelsea, B.Celtics
Foxsports posted it on fb, as well as the cricket.com.au fb pageTalk or speculation?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Foxsports posted it on fb, as well as the cricket.com.au fb pageTalk or speculation?
If Agars bowling does come on like we'd hope, I think he'd make a good number 7. Already a much better bat than Faulkner.It's a shame that we don't have 1, let alone 2 good quality spin bowlers. If we did I would be really comfortable playing Wade at 6, Faulkner at 7, 2 spinners and Hazelwood and Starc. Shame Agar was injured - I might've even been comfortable with Wade at 6, Faulkner 7 and Agar 8 (then 3 quicks).
That said, Whiteman's batting form is well-timed. I think he might be a little stiff that he doesn't even seem in consideration.
if Maddinson gets a game im throwing the toys out the pram and taking my bat and ball and going home.Plenty of talk on the radio that Maddinson may have been give the nod for a test spot? That is a strange decision if true. I'd have Patterson miles ahead of him and than even Lehman before him.
If we're looking to change the third paceman (which I doubt we will, if Mennie has been rested from Shield), what puts Jackson Bird ahead of Chris Tremain at the moment?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
He did just get Smith (twice) and Warner as well as Maddinson so thart's got to say something. I'd have Bird ahead of him though who has a very good rest record.I think Tremain will struggle to take wickets at the top end due to the fact he gets most of his wickets through pace, and he's not 145-150 bowler but a 135-140
What time are the selectors expected to announce the team?
He can swing it thoI think Tremain will struggle to take wickets at the top end due to the fact he gets most of his wickets through pace, and he's not 145-150 bowler but a 135-140
4.30 AEDT
Cheers.
Can we please get the selectors drug tested
What happened?Maybe rod marsh was the sane one all along
according to multiple sources on grandstand, renshaw is a certainty. Wade and handy in too
I have no problem with those decisions. It's the talk of Maddinson after averaging 30 last year that worries me.Can we please get the selectors drug tested
So with all the mail reporters seem to have gotten in the last 24-48 hours what do people think the side will be? For mine now I think it could be:
Warner
Renshaw
Khawaja
Smith (c)
Handscomb
Patterson
Wade (wk)
Starc
Hazelwood
Bird
Lyon
Some rumours Maddinson could be given the nod ahead of Patterson because Mark Waugh loves him (I think it'd be a mistake because Maddinson doesn't seem to be in great form). Lyon survives only because the two best replacements (Agar and O'Keefe are both injured).
That's the side I'd be going with mate, hopefully you're on the money.So with all the mail reporters seem to have gotten in the last 24-48 hours what do people think the side will be? For mine now I think it could be:
Warner
Renshaw
Khawaja
Smith (c)
Handscomb
Patterson
Wade (wk)
Starc
Hazelwood
Bird
Lyon
Some rumours Maddinson could be given the nod ahead of Patterson because Mark Waugh loves him (I think it'd be a mistake because Maddinson doesn't seem to be in great form). Lyon survives only because the two best replacements (Agar and O'Keefe are both injured).
Mennie is another Hastings. Not up to test cricket. Bird has a good test record and should have got the gig to start with except for his batting apparently.Why would Mennie be dropped after 1 game?
Ferg deserves more than 1 too.
If Maddison is picked! <facepalm>