- Oct 18, 2013
- 101,487
- 155,004
- AFL Club
- Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Carolina Panthers
Geez aside from Brayshaw that bench could literally be anyone.
How exciting mate, so many possibilities!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Geez aside from Brayshaw that bench could literally be anyone.
Someone that doesn't fumble. Surely in all of Casey and Melbourne we can find two who don't fumble.Bowey and Brayshaw were not going to be outs, who would you replace them with?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Given the extended bench they have named,
Charlie Spargo, Bailey Laurie, Josh Schache, Adam Tomlinson
Chandler as sub.
Chandler gets to be sub because he has been good. Spargo deserves a shot at redemption and Laurie deserves a run.Why Chandler sub mate? I think hes been pretty good since coming back in.
Also no Brayshaw? Hes a lock.
Chandler gets to be sub because he has been good. Spargo deserves a shot at redemption and Laurie deserves a run.
Brayshaw back to VFL where he can contemplate the meaning of a net positive contribution. Practice kicking the ball and handballing to the Red and Blue players.
Bit late with this one mate Gus has been our best defensive mid by a long way for a weeks now.Chandler gets to be sub because he has been good. Spargo deserves a shot at redemption and Laurie deserves a run.
Brayshaw back to VFL where he can contemplate the meaning of a net positive contribution. Practice kicking the ball and handballing to the Red and Blue players.
If ever there was evidence I'm living in a simulationBit late with this one mate Gus has been our best defensive mid by a long way for a weeks now.
Agreed. Drop Petracca instead.Bit late with this one mate Gus has been our best defensive mid by a long way for a weeks now.

Chandler gets to be sub because he has been good.
Ladies and gentlemen, in the words of the late Gough Whitlam …
“It’s Time”
![]()
That would be car crash footy, would go along with morbid curiosity to see how bad it could really beAlmost worth the $5 admission
Bloke still sucks with the pill, not sure he's kicked a goal since he's been playing as a mid and still hacks it on either side but he has been good hunting down the oppo when the balls in disputeIf ever there was evidence I'm living in a simulation![]()
What's weird is picking a bloke purely based on the amount he's paid for a role he was clearly terrible at and not giving Schache a go to begin withI still don’t get the naming of Schache in the extended squad.
If the match committee had faith in Schache at AFL level then there’s been several times earlier in the year when he should’ve played.
That would’ve either proved he had what it takes, or proved the opposite.
But when Schache was in form and there was a spot open, they didn’t play him.
Similar deal with Laurie.
Why would virtually untried players this year be expected to all of a sudden come into the team with finals just around the corner and contribute in a meaningful way?
It’s just weird selection to me. Even if they end up as emergencies on game day.