noWe are basically full strength.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
noWe are basically full strength.
Just finished watching the Essendon game again..........not sure how Thomas survived over Varcoe this week IMO.
Watching Varcoe not take a backward step against Hooker who tried to be “tough” was brilliant.
Those aren’t low tackles numbers. He’s had more tackles than any other forward. But do t let that get in the way of a good story.So low tackles low possessions low metres gained and no scoreboard impact are not stats the coaches care about? Alright.
Those aren’t low tackles numbers. He’s had more tackles than any other forward. But do t let that get in the way of a good story.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
He is a utility player, not a forward.. he has kicked 1 goal for the year, if he's a forward that's shocking.
He averages 3 tackles a game, same as Greenwood Brown Pendlebury Maynard, slightly more than De Goey Beams and Crisp, less than Adams Treloar and Grundy. If tackles are only thing he brings to the table then yes, 3 tackles per game is quite low.
The other aspects of his game have got nothing to do with his tackle numbers.
Stephenson to Varcoe's role, offers just as much pressure, much cleaner hands and thus much more offensive danger. Elliott to Stevos role, offers just as much. Its a win. I like Varcoe, but he can't pick the ball up off the ground at the moment, without three grabbing it. Needs to get some confidence back in the vfl.Varcoe omitted?
How many times does Bucks need to learn not to drop Varcoe?
Varcoe's value is grossly underestimated. The thing that he does (other than the tackling) that few others do is run to the spillage position at full pace, so that if the ball goes there, he is placed to do something really positive. It is the nature of such running that our oval ball often goes slightly elsewhere. The conservative player gets it more often, but can't do so much with it. I firmly believe that we need this characteristic in our team, and it is worth accepting the times the ball bounces away for the times when he gets it at pace and can really do damage. I am sorry he is the one to miss out, but somebody had to for Elliott.
Cox had to be replaced by another tall player. Reid does not provide the difference that Cox does, but he is no mug either.
Have to spend the night teaching my Aussie/ American mate about AFL. His missus goes for the Eagles, so you know, hasn't had a lot of education on the matter.I implore everyone to go tomorrow night if you can. Member or not, Understand its at marvel I hate the place too but the boys need us tomorrow night.
Come on guys lets fill the place!!!
I’ll be there.
When the stadium is filled quite a bit, it’s ok.
I don’t park there, as it’s a maze to find your car and it’s a real rip off.
That said the viewing is pretty good - and great when you’re winning![]()

yes, we desperately need varcoes 9 handballs and 3 tackles for the game... He is so overrated by some its crazy
I applaud your passion, but I won’t be setting foot in that dung heap of a stadium.I implore everyone to go tomorrow night if you can. Member or not, Understand its at marvel I hate the place too but the boys need us tomorrow night.
Come on guys lets fill the place!!!
I get the point you are making but in the last 4 matches DeGoey has kicked our or the games first goal, 3 times. Last week he kicked our second goal. I think we leave him where he is dangerous early.Not too surprised with the changes really.
Reid in for Cox is a no brainer.
Elliott was always coming back in when fit - I always thought it would be out of Thomas, Varcoe or Brown so not that surprised. My initial thought was Brown but glad to see him go around again.
Elliott is an upgrade on Varcoe, we can push Stephenson up a little bit into the role Varcoe was trying to execute and Elliott plays closer to goal.
Don't change structure, Reid plays the forward role that Cox has been playing.
Grundy can ruck between the arcs, when the ball is in defence Moore/Roughead can ruck. When in the 50 someone like Reid could contest.
When Grundy needs a rest, Reid goes in and we play the smaller forward setup. It will only be for short periods.
As others have said, would consider Greenwood on Boak.
Would also start DeGoey in the middle when the heat is on early. Good to have a bull in there early. Beams can start at half forward then after 5 minutes or so swap with DeGoey.
How I hope we line up:
B - Langdon Roughead Howe
HB - Maynard Moore Crisp
C - Pendlebury DeGoey Sidebottom
HF - WHE Mihochek Beams
F - Elliott Reid Stephenson
R - Grundy Adams Treloar
INT - Phillips Greenwood Brown Thomas
Roughead to their ruckman that plays forward - Ryder/Lycett
Moore to Westhoff
Pretty decent line up to be fair.
His pressure against the Dogs was manic and he would often be harassing 2 or 3 of their players at a time when they were trying to use handball to get themselves out of trouble. This may not always show on TV but it's clear when at the ground.Varcoe may not do much but everything he does has pain factor written on it. He only needs to bob up once or twice a quarter to make his presence felt. I reckon we have enough opportunist goalsneaks that Thomas could afford to miss. Varcoe makes them think twice about taking them on through the corridor though.
This was the OP to gameday thread: https://www.bigfooty.com/forum/thre...ac-day-2019-thursday-25-4-mcg-3-20pm.1216722/
Awesome read.
His aggro has resulted in 1 Free for and 7 free kicks against... So much for great "pressure". He has 17 tackles, 25 kicks and 1 goal for the entire season... Why are people so unable to rate him objectively?
Not too surprised with the changes really.
Reid in for Cox is a no brainer.
Elliott was always coming back in when fit - I always thought it would be out of Thomas, Varcoe or Brown so not that surprised. My initial thought was Brown but glad to see him go around again.
Elliott is an upgrade on Varcoe, we can push Stephenson up a little bit into the role Varcoe was trying to execute and Elliott plays closer to goal.
Don't change structure, Reid plays the forward role that Cox has been playing.
Grundy can ruck between the arcs, when the ball is in defence Moore/Roughead can ruck. When in the 50 someone like Reid could contest.
When Grundy needs a rest, Reid goes in and we play the smaller forward setup. It will only be for short periods.
As others have said, would consider Greenwood on Boak.
Would also start DeGoey in the middle when the heat is on early. Good to have a bull in there early. Beams can start at half forward then after 5 minutes or so swap with DeGoey.
How I hope we line up:
B - Langdon Roughead Howe
HB - Maynard Moore Crisp
C - Pendlebury DeGoey Sidebottom
HF - WHE Mihochek Beams
F - Elliott Reid Stephenson
R - Grundy Adams Treloar
INT - Phillips Greenwood Brown Thomas
Roughead to their ruckman that plays forward - Ryder/Lycett
Moore to Westhoff
Pretty decent line up to be fair.
Yep agree. His game against Essendon wasn't the best but he does things that don't get a stat but I reckon his team-mates appreciate it.
Varcoe's value is grossly underestimated. The thing that he does (other than the tackling) that few others do is run to the spillage position at full pace, so that if the ball goes there, he is placed to do something really positive. It is the nature of such running that our oval ball often goes slightly elsewhere. The conservative player gets it more often, but can't do so much with it. I firmly believe that we need this characteristic in our team, and it is worth accepting the times the ball bounces away for the times when he gets it at pace and can really do damage. I am sorry he is the one to miss out, but somebody had to for Elliott.
We have a new whipping boy, hurrah!