What that I ignore blatant wrongness?
Changes Vs Melbourne
- Thread starter RichosGuns
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Like I said performances will prove who is right and who is wrong. Check your PM.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
No but the thing is beave, you are wrong sometimes. Everybody is wrong. You actually cannot say you are wrong. You can't.
I can't either really to be honest. Just a personality trait. A negative one, mind you.
I can't either really to be honest. Just a personality trait. A negative one, mind you.
No when I'm wrong I make sure I acknowledge it.
Well you don't.
Give me an example.
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2007
- Posts
- 5,927
- Reaction score
- 29
- Location
- em dub
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Burgers, City
Yeah, you struggle to admit you're wrong, Beav. You're very good at arguing, and so even when your premise is wrong, you can argue your way out, but at times you are blatantly wrong and fail to admit to it.
Seeing as I'm wrong quite often, I don't think this is an issue for me. It probably is only for those that are right most of the time. Or, in your case, for those that can argue like a bitch...
Seeing as I'm wrong quite often, I don't think this is an issue for me. It probably is only for those that are right most of the time. Or, in your case, for those that can argue like a bitch...
So my premise is wrong? So our opinions are different. Perhaps you should learn the difference?
But regarding GTF and I knowing each other, you clearly didn't think we did, and when you learnt we did you didn't acknowledge my post at all. You're a bad person basically.
Can't be ****ed finding examples, although I will one day. Basically I have just noticed you tend to ignore posts that suit you to ignore.
Well you answered my question, didn't think I needed to acknowledge that. Drop that ego slops fish.
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2007
- Posts
- 5,927
- Reaction score
- 29
- Location
- em dub
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Burgers, City
Now lets not get fastidious. Even now, by taking it up against me saying at times your premise is wrong, is failing to admit that you are ever wrong. Do you believe yourself so perfect that you are never wrong? And if you do not, then you would have to agree that at some stage your premise has been wrong. Whether or not it is a difference of opinion to me is irrelevant.
That's quite an intellectual post corma.
I already said I acknowledge when I'm wrong. I am simply questioning what you deem wrong to be. My ideas about the club are what I considered "premise" and I consider that to be quite broad. No I don't think I'm wrong about that and you have yet to prove me wrong. Now if you want to talk specifics I'm happy to admit I've been wrong about certain things, such as my thoughts on Luke McGuane for example.
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2007
- Posts
- 5,927
- Reaction score
- 29
- Location
- em dub
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Burgers, City
I wasn't going into specifics, and can't be bothered finding examples. But generally, as has been stated, when you have been blatantly wrong in any given argument over BF, you have struggled to admit "defeat". Not necessarily over the whole "optimist vs pessimest" thing, just in general.
One would call it stubborn, probably. And a lot of the time it is a good quality to have (do you "possess" qualities?), but in some circumstances, like the ones GTF, JSF and I can obviously think of, but can't be bothered finding, it can become a negative of your personality.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Hehe. That's in response to your post GTF just so you know.
[YOUTUBE]nxNyoAMqRXQ[/YOUTUBE]
[YOUTUBE]nxNyoAMqRXQ[/YOUTUBE]
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2007
- Posts
- 1,403
- Reaction score
- 8
- Location
- Melbourne
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Green Bay Packers
Ok, this is what I think Wallace will do:
Out: Hislop, Edwards, King
In: Coughlan, Connors, McMahon
This is what I would do:
Out: King, Tambling, Edwards, Jackson, Schulz and Bowden.
In: Connors, Collins, Nahas, Post, Coughlan and Thomson.
Polo----Moore----Rance
Newman-McGuane-Deledio
White---Coughlan--Brown
Morton--Riewoldt--Richardson
Nahas----Post----Connors
Simmonds--Foley--Tuck
Graham-Thomson-Collins-Hislop
Out: Hislop, Edwards, King
In: Coughlan, Connors, McMahon
This is what I would do:
Out: King, Tambling, Edwards, Jackson, Schulz and Bowden.
In: Connors, Collins, Nahas, Post, Coughlan and Thomson.
Polo----Moore----Rance
Newman-McGuane-Deledio
White---Coughlan--Brown
Morton--Riewoldt--Richardson
Nahas----Post----Connors
Simmonds--Foley--Tuck
Graham-Thomson-Collins-Hislop
Similar threads
