- Dec 27, 2016
- 26,884
- 56,889
- AFL Club
- Western Bulldogs
- Thread starter
- Moderator
- #826
liked stories about the filmed murder of a Carnivale performer by a group.
You like them too it seems.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
liked stories about the filmed murder of a Carnivale performer by a group.
You're just spinning your wheels repeating, ad nauseum , the same dismissed rubbish that the police are no longer interested in.so Droc was a criminal with a sex offence? and yet this person was so convinced about Drocs claims about the taxi driver he said “evidence has been presented, have you read it” and later when asked about why he no longer posts about CSK says the person asking the question sounds “like a frustrated cop.” why would the cop be frustrated? did he report his concerns about the taxi driver prior, then or since?
so you know what the police are interested in and what they are not. ok. question remains did any of the former associates of the taxi driver report their concerns to the police prior, then or since. or did they just like doing it online because of some other motivation.You're just spinning your wheels repeating, ad nauseum , the same dismissed rubbish that the police are no longer interested in.
Frustrated cop or frustrated internet flogger.
No they didntso you know what the police are interested in and what they are not. ok then. question remains did any of the former associates of the taxi driver report their concerns to the police prior, then or since.
you really should read what he wrote when asked about why he no longer was contributing about the CSK subject. online elsewhere.
so. what are these innocent professional people associated with the Carnivale doing closely associated with people you are saying might be unsavoury and perhaps dodgy? how stupid must they feel?So ... ?
Maybe he's an unsavoury character, plenty of them around. Maybe he was up to something dodgy.
There are also those that create multiple aliases to do so. It raises my suspicion level immenselyHe was probably told to shut up and made up another story about why.
Quite a few people over the years have drawn attention for interfering in the investigation, trying to insert themselves into the story, making it about them, getting themselves noticed pretending they know more than they do or maybe some of them really thought that they did. Some have even launched onto CSK forums and started to accuse genuine people of actually being involved in the crimes.
True Crime Garage who studied this, raised it in a podcast on the Long Island Serial Killer, apparently destructive trolls invaded a very productive online forum almost ruining it and of course, raising suspicions they were the ones actually involved.
speaking of immense suspicion hire a mathematician and get them to plug in that data with the names of that small online association based in Freo formerly closely associated with the taxi driver (and another ex associate called Alex) whose members have posted about the same taxi driver. if you get the chance see how you goThere are also those that create multiple aliases to do so. It raises my suspicion level immensely
Yawnspeaking of immense suspicion hire a mathematician and get them to plug in that data with the names of that small online association based in Freo formerly closely associated with the taxi driver (and another ex associate called Alex) whose members have posted about the same taxi driver. if you get the chance see how you go
Estelle Blackburn, a respected investigative journalist who unlike Droc was without priors for fraud and a sex offence was so convinced her ex boyfriend was the CSK she wrote a book about her experience. Some other woman was certain it was her ex husband who drove taxis and was also responsible for the Lovers Lane murders. The only evidence Droc had was a good story.
So I wonder if other POIs are out of the woods yet? I hear most of them have
I think Droc's musings were not unfounded, but maybe a broader group of people up to no good.
When asked if he would provide DNA and answer questions, he refused because he didn't trust police. Wouldn't police already have his DNA for other crimes? Maybe not, and maybe he stood to be charged for other crimes once on a criminal database.
Who were the people in the taxi, where the woman broke her ankle climbing out?
I think there will be witness's rolling in as the evidence rolls out. More dots to dot connections. Past suspicions conformed.
In the fray of the investigation, which was enormous, a lot of people were turned away. Trial outcomes might confirm other suspicions. Police will be waiting for this also.
I think police had probable cause for all their POIs, backed by psychology and well founded information.
There was an abduction by two men in a taxi, they raped a girl and let her go. It got more press than the Karrakatta attack did and identikits went out, swarthy and similar in looks they could have been related. But I think not connected to the CSK because they would have had the DNA.
There was more than one sexual predator attacking women in and around Perth's western suburbs, likely several but one serial killer.
If history repeats, there's another one coming through now in that area.
What about Peter Weygers? His house got raided and one of the neighbours rang him at work to say there was a home invasion taking place and to ring the cops. So he rang the cops. And they said "oh .. no we're raiding your property."
On a psychic's tip apparently.
If discussions with some certain people I spoke are true, there were people who knew of this crime. Heavily following by a certain demographic you wouldn't expect.
There is certain information I can't tell you. I don't think police can either. Maybe defamation is too possible from the former chairman of civil rights. PW was not popular either.
How did police get a warrant to enter his property? They must have had probable cause. Otherwise evidence would be inadmissible.
Interesting SR have an experience in the crime, and live in the rear yard of PW, in Embleton.
Why have police consistently asked questions about gay relationships, or whether the POI wore women's clothes? Will that be valid later when we hear evidence of the trial?
Do police have evidence of a cross dresser being involved in the crime? A profiler has made the call of a cross dresser?
If anybody knew or suspected BRE was the CSK (outside of family who would have been in denial anyway) they would have tipped him in. To be sure. I'm very curious though as to how he evaded the net, or if he was questioned or had police attention and they either screwed up in giving him a pass, or they just couldnt get enough on him to charge.
I'm still not convinced he wasn't the IT expert caught trying to pick up a young girl on the Stirling Highway in Mosman Park.
I havent heard a thing about police asking questions on gay relationships and what profiler made the cross dresser call? I thought it was only me that did that.
Collect your reward yet ExcaliburX? Big $$$ on offer.
Didnt think so.
Unsure why you are posting pics of big footy forum posts on your twitter.