Cory Bernardi

[Ice-Wolf]

I'm not going to say Cory is gay but I will say that I doubt anyone would be surprised if he was.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

Right wingers throw around terms like cultural Marxism or cultural relativism like they actually know what it means.

 

[Admiral Byng]

Right wingers throw around terms like cultural Marxism or cultural relativism like they actually know what it means.

.. and like it's a bad thing.

 

[sherb]

Poor Cory, the precious flower. Looks like he can dish it out but can't take it.

http://junkee.com/cory-bernardi-is-...hat-bill-shorten-called-him-a-homophobe/73924

And I like Daniel Andrews' thoughts on the matter.

 

[Gough]

I'm with Andrews, I am so sick of this shit. This country is still explicitly homophobic, if our government is representative of the people.

 

[madmug]

Its typical of this gutless trollop of a politician. He can dish it out, but he cant take it.

The hard right are a nasty malicious lot.

They would support Multi $million to have their little chaplaincy program in with the kiddies, but 'hate' the small support this small group get & need.

Bernardi & Abetz can go to their own hell for their hateful & spiteful behaviors.

 

[Lester Burnham]

You might be right. Have you ever seen American Beauty? Kevin Spacey's next door neighbour was always threatening to or beating up his son because he didn't want him to be gay. Later in the movie he releases his hidden homosexuality when he tries to kiss Kevin Spacey.

It's fiction Lebbo I reckon the author borrowed the idea from Last Exit to Brooklyn.

 

[Lester Burnham]

Poor Cory, the precious flower. Looks like he can dish it out but can't take it.

http://junkee.com/cory-bernardi-is-...hat-bill-shorten-called-him-a-homophobe/73924

And I like Daniel Andrews' thoughts on the matter.

What a load of wank by Andrews. How about getting the trains running, you muppet.

 

[Maggie5]

Typical comment by Lester.

 

[cartwright]

What a load of wank by Andrews. How about getting the trains running, you muppet.

Which part, of the comment by Andrews make it a "load of wank", exactly?

 

[Maggie5]

You might be right. Have you ever seen American Beauty? Kevin Spacey's next door neighbour was always threatening to or beating up his son because he didn't want him to be gay. Later in the movie he releases his hidden homosexuality when he tries to kiss Kevin Spacey.

Haven't seen it but not sure that I am right, just thought it was an interesting concept.
Case of the saying, 'the lady man doth protest too much'?

 

[sherb]

What a load of wank by Andrews. How about getting the trains running, you muppet.

Yeah, because trains are the only important thing in a society.

 

[Lester Burnham]

Which part, of the comment by Andrews make it a "load of wank", exactly?

It's a string of straw men linked together by motherhood statements.

eg

The assumption that the intention is to have the program shut down.

The implication that if you disagree with aspects of the Safe Schools program then you don't want kids to be safe at school.

The accusation that if you disagree with aspects of the Safe Schools program then you are offended by the kids it is aimed at.

The accusation - 'they don't like the fact that some kids might be different'.

The claim that Cory Bernardi said 'teenagers are too young to know about love and care and acceptance'.

 

[Gough]

There are all sorts of excuses floating round about this from apologists, kids don't need it, they're too young to understand, cultural relativism/Marxism, kids will feel pressured (to be what I don't know), they should be learning the three r's, but the fact is, it is homophobia from the knuckle dragging, god bothering, wing of the Liberal Party that has forced this issue. Anybody who suggests otherwise is fooling themselves.

 

[Maggie5]

Yeah, because trains are the only important thing in a society.

Really good point. I truly can't remember the last time taking a train anywhere but can distinctly remember the last time a child was bullied because of their sexuality.

 

[Inferno]

It's a string of straw men linked together by motherhood statements.

eg

The assumption that the intention is to have the program shut down.

The implication that if you disagree with aspects of the Safe Schools program then you don't want kids to be safe at school.

The accusation that if you disagree with aspects of the Safe Schools program then you are offended by the kids it is aimed at.

The accusation - 'they don't like the fact that some kids might be different'.

The claim that Cory Bernardi said 'teenagers are too young to know about love and care and acceptance'.

As opposed to Cory and friends statements which centred on how this program is cultural Marxism by the gay agenda?

 

[Maggie5]

http://www.corybernardi.com/keep_political_agendas_out_of_schools

"Of course, like every other Australian, homosexual activists are free to pursue their cause among the adult community in whatever manner they like, within the bounds of the law. But they should have the decency to leave our children and our education system out of it."

Perhaps he should also tell Shelton and the Christian lobby to do the same.

 

[cartwright]

It's a string of straw men linked together by motherhood statements.

eg

The assumption that the intention is to have the program shut down.

The implication that if you disagree with aspects of the Safe Schools program then you don't want kids to be safe at school.

The accusation that if you disagree with aspects of the Safe Schools program then you are offended by the kids it is aimed at.

The accusation - 'they don't like the fact that some kids might be different'.

The claim that Cory Bernardi said 'teenagers are too young to know about love and care and acceptance'.

What else would the reasoning be, to be investigating the safe school program?

Why do the ACL claim its a victory against "rainbow ideology"? (whatever that is)

http://www.theage.com.au/federal-po...fter-right-wing-pressure-20160223-gn16rg.html

 

[Chief]

There are all sorts of excuses floating round about this from apologists, kids don't need it, they're too young to understand, cultural relativism/Marxism, kids will feel pressured (to be what I don't know)

You know.

 

[Lester Burnham]

There are all sorts of excuses floating round about this from apologists, kids don't need it, they're too young to understand, cultural relativism/Marxism, kids will feel pressured (to be what I don't know), they should be learning the three r's, but the fact is, it is homophobia from the knuckle dragging, god bothering, wing of the Liberal Party that has forced this issue. Anybody who suggests otherwise is fooling themselves.

Last time I checked Joe Bullock was in the Labor Party.

Western Australian senator Joe Bullock has since called for the program to be "immediately stopped".

Senator Bullock told News Corp it was a terrible program.

"This program is so narrowly focused on homosexual issues that it doesn't provide the sort of balance one would hope," he said.​

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-25/safe-schools-terrible-labor-senator-joe-bullock-says/7198300

 

[Upgrayedd]

Last time I checked Joe Bullock was in the Labor Party.

Western Australian senator Joe Bullock has since called for the program to be "immediately stopped".

Senator Bullock told News Corp it was a terrible program.

"This program is so narrowly focused on homosexual issues that it doesn't provide the sort of balance one would hope," he said.​

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-25/safe-schools-terrible-labor-senator-joe-bullock-says/7198300

A lot of labor supporters wish that Joe Bullock would crawl back in the hole he came out of. He's a part of the labor which puts off a lot of australians switching. Greens must adore him wielding so much power. Probably accounts for a few thousand votes for them

 

[sherb]

It's a string of straw men linked together by motherhood statements.

eg

The assumption that the intention is to have the program shut down.

The implication that if you disagree with aspects of the Safe Schools program then you don't want kids to be safe at school.

The accusation that if you disagree with aspects of the Safe Schools program then you are offended by the kids it is aimed at.

The accusation - 'they don't like the fact that some kids might be different'.

The claim that Cory Bernardi said 'teenagers are too young to know about love and care and acceptance'.

Of course the intention is to have it shut down.

 

[Gough]

You know.

By responding to your post, I'm putting you in danger of catching teh gay. #CoryThink

 

[Maggie5]

Last time I checked Joe Bullock was in the Labor Party.

Western Australian senator Joe Bullock has since called for the program to be "immediately stopped".

Senator Bullock told News Corp it was a terrible program.

"This program is so narrowly focused on homosexual issues that it doesn't provide the sort of balance one would hope," he said.​

http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-02-25/safe-schools-terrible-labor-senator-joe-bullock-says/7198300

Do you think that posters who think Cory is out of order consider this because he is a Lib?
This is not about politics. You don't seem to get it.

 

[PetrikDngerfild]

Really good point. I truly can't remember the last time taking a train anywhere but can distinctly remember the last time a child was bullied because of their sexuality.

Wel if u r a poar Hiwerd Betlar lyk lestr n mi. U cnt efford a howse in teh citi n hav to lif ova here in Gilon.

N wi fil intitled to citi trensport dispiet livin in a rieginal shithal, ppl in Wengeretta dnt kare, wi Gilon ppl r speshal.