- Sep 10, 2010
- 18,144
- 25,253
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions

I wonder why neither GC nor Port preferred to deal with North. Their first pick next year should be a good one.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
So do melbourne then look to split pick 9 for a couple of mid to late 1sts and give one of them to port?Thought it strange we don't have a thread because the way the Heraldsun is talking about it, he might be playing for the Dee's by the time two clubs meet in a couple of weeks.
Seems like a brain-dead move from Melbourne to me but what do I know
I'd have to assume they would give it straight up given there is no incentive to trade him from Ports perspective. It's pretty odd that he's supposed to be so gettableSo do melbourne then look to split pick 9 for a couple of mid to late 1sts and give one of them to port?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Port may be eyeing this draft as a very strong one and are doing another 'wingard' to try and get their man / men. They have form in being bold to try and get their targetsI'd have to assume they would give it straight up given there is no incentive to trade him from Ports perspective. It's pretty odd that he's supposed to be so gettable
I for one am looking forward to getting our targets using their picksPort may be eyeing this draft as a very strong one and are doing another 'wingard' to try and get their man / men. They have form in being bold to try and get their targets
Its opportunity cost in this draft..pick 9 may get you Lalor. An unknown but a player with a potential ceiling much higher than houston good as he is. Will be an interesting watchAbsolutely the kind of player Melbourne need.
Depends where the club sees themselves with a flag shotIts opportunity cost in this draft..pick 9 may get you Lalor. An unknown but a player with a potential ceiling much higher than houston good as he is. Will be an interesting watch
You should be doing absolutely everything to get a key forward, if your list manager thinks Houston is more important then he shouldn’t have a job in 8 weeksAbsolutely the kind of player Melbourne need.
You should be doing absolutely everything to get a key forward, if your list manager thinks Houston is more important then he shouldn’t have a job in 8 weeks
Contracted for 3 more years, AA, beautiful kick and mark, top 3 best and fairest last year and will be again this year.
Unless it's massive overs I don't get why port would trade him
Houston and ports future 2nd
For
Pickett and current first
Pick 9 for Houston and change I could do. Would throw in Sparrow as steak knives.
2 firsts, you would want a Butters or Rozee coming back.
Houston and Pickett probably worth about the same, considering Pickett is way younger as well.
Your window is now while Gawn, petracca and may are still top of their game. JvR or Jefferson arnt going to do itWe got JvR and Jefferson who should do the trick.
Do you think with Gawn and May another year older that they could really contend? I don't see the point in trying to top up. You have such a good start on your next gen of players, surely better off building around them then trying to top up. It just has disaster all over itDepends where the club sees themselves with a flag shot
In next year or two while we have Gawn and May.
Yeah but any key forwards available? Easy to say that but decent ones don’t grow on trees.You should be doing absolutely everything to get a key forward, if your list manager thinks Houston is more important then he shouldn’t have a job in 8 weeks
DBJ and Dixon are also AA, Houston isn't an multiple AA and you want 2 top 10 picks for him?Houston has the runs on the board and is elite / AA for his position.
Pickett still has to take that next jump up, jury is still out
If it’s only one pick we give up then it’s worth it. 2 firsts and it’s getting to dangerous areas with the list.Do you think with Gawn and May another year older that they could really contend? I don't see the point in trying to top up. You have such a good start on your next gen of players, surely better off building around them then trying to top up. It just has disaster all over it
Port would want two high firsts. One being a top 5 minimum.
Alot different to a pick 10 this year (or worse) and another first next year 10 or worse
Do you think with Gawn and May another year older that they could really contend? I don't see the point in trying to top up. You have such a good start on your next gen of players, surely better off building around them then trying to top up. It just has disaster all over it
You wot?
We are talking about Dan Houston and not Zak Butters here right?

Melbourne don't need a 27 year old back flanker. Why do we need to throw precious draft picks away for a guy that will give us 4 years of service when we're rebuilding? I could understand if he was a key forward, but not a back flanker.Absolutely the kind of player Melbourne need.