Oppo Camp Dangerfield's Gone (Zero tolerance to trolling) - READ THREAD LINKED IN OP BEFORE POSTING

[Mahlepi]

Once again the Betts argument gets raised and once again it falls to pieces with two minutes! When will people learn!!

your won supporters dont understand he was a rfa not fa
if you dont match this situation will be identical

 

[baldandbroke]

i agree we should, but the rules only penalise you if the afl can prove that this was the intention when taking on the 2 year deal
no proof no sanctions

Yeah it is funny how they can only penalise you if they can prove it.

It's a bit like murder in that way.

 

[marty36]

we only need to make an offer that the crows dont match
we have heaps of cap space

Didn't you listen to Scott and dangerfield talk about the negotiations ATM. Or do you just ignore what the major players in this situation say!

 

[kirky]

Once again the Betts argument gets raised and once again it falls to pieces with two minutes! When will people learn!!

Quite simple - we Crows people know the rules - shit we have been reamed enough times in recent years!

 

[baldandbroke]

your won supporters dont understand he was a rfa not fa
if you dont match this situation will be identical

And you and your mates don't seem to understand why AFC would match - when Carlton didn't.

If If If If .... bloody hell.

 

[Mahlepi]

Trying to link the Betts move to the Dangerfield one is not an intelligent move.

You are showing how the RFA system does work by referring to it.

Carlton didn't want him for the $$$ AFC would pay. That is how it is supposed to work.

If you want Dangerfield for more than AFC can pay, you get him for nothing.

If Geelong want to keep it's structure of not paying top dollar to keep it's group together and give it an advantage ... then you should expect to trade.

You see, you can't eat your cake and have it too. Either you pay overs - and sacrifice some $, or you pay less and sacrifice some players or picks.

appreciate that otc

carlton was a prime example of where they should have matched if they wanted to maximise their reward, but they didnt

lets see how this plays out

 

[fuddrooster]

Glad a loyal bloke and not a homesick sook won the brownlow.

 

[Mahlepi]

And you and your mates don't seem to understand why AFC would match - when Carlton didn't.

If If If If .... bloody hell.

appreciate the emotion, and the baggage of trades that have been lopsided in the past
the afl failed you in the tippett trade where they looked after their pets, who backfired on them

 

[kirky]

Glad a loyal bloke and not a homesick sook won the brownlow.

Is it home sickness or his future wife wearing the pants?

 

[mattymac]

we only need to make an offer that the crows dont match
we have heaps of cap space

So do we

 

[baldandbroke]

appreciate the emotion, and the baggage of trades that have been lopsided in the past
the afl failed you in the tippett trade where they looked after their pets, who backfired on them

Emotion? That is more from you with your two-faced posting. On here you are much more reasonable, and it feels very forced.

The Tippett shit-storm was our fault - not the AFL's.

There is no baggage from lopsided past trades - what are you talking about.

I know you are banned from your own Dangerfield thread, but please don't feel you need to invade ours to fill in your evenings.

 

[Bovo]

ill come back to the betts situation - which trade picks did you give up for him

If Carlton matched we would have had to trade. They didn't. Their choice. What has that got to do with this?

 

[Bone71]

your won supporters dont understand he was a rfa not fa
if you dont match this situation will be identical

It would be , if we don't match. Its up to the Cats to force that situation. Will they? Maybe but all indications so far says they won't.

 

[Red mist]

Price gone up yet?

 

[Mahlepi]

Emotion? That is more from you with your two-faced posting. On here you are much more reasonable, and it feels very forced.

The Tippett shit-storm was our fault - not the AFL's.

There is no baggage from lopsided past trades - what are you talking about.

I know you are banned from your own Dangerfield thread, but please don't feel you need to invade ours to fill in your evenings.

no need to reply
you tag me into every second post

 

[Lawrst]

He is still massively overrated

Apparently will turn the cats into a top 4 team next year...

I mean no he isn't.... He's top 3 in the league.

 

[CrowsB4hoes]

That was his last chance to win a brownlow. It's very rare to win from outside the 8.

 

[Mahlepi]

It would be , if we don't match. Its up to the Cats to force that situation. Will they? Maybe but all indications so far says they won't.

cats list is too weak to sell the farm
timing is out for geelong, they should have recruited him 2 years ago, when the list was stronger
we have 9 spots this year and another 6 next year
cant fill those with picks 50 plus

 

[Strangled Cat]

Haha we have to convince you? You've been chasing him for 2 years

At the price that you guys in this thread are hoping your CEO demands, yes you'd need to do a lot of convincing. But it won't happen, as your demands are too high and Fagan isn't an idiot. Fagan can get "the best deal imaginable" and you guys will be cold, because what you want is unrealistic.

 

[KrissCross]

Such a stupid threat.

So effectively a club could draft him for 1 year and turn him into more the following year when it's their turn to trade him plus they get him for a year.

Besides there is no way Danger will want to go through this again.

Has Jay Clarks name on it guys...forget about it. Just another propaganda piece from the chronic masturbator Geeling campaigner

 

[Draft Bored]

This is going to sound like I'm a bitter ex-girlfriend but Fyfe's speech really made me realise we're better off without Mr.Egocentric especially when we're trying to embrace the late Phil Walsh's mantra of team first. I'll be satisfied with pick 14 compensation to be honest. Fyfe was taken below this and I want someone who says this:


Instead of this:

"Footy isn't the number 1 thing in my life."

 

[Bovo]

Well that will be the last time we will see Danger alongside the rest of the team. I think I was upset at first, skipped angry, and moved on to looking forward to the next chapter. Won't ever hate the guy....it is what it is.

 

[KrissCross]

At the price that you guys in this thread are hoping your CEO demands, yes you'd need to do a lot of convincing. But it won't happen, as your demands are too high and Fagan isn't an idiot. Fagan can get "the best deal imaginable" and you guys will be cold, because what you want is unrealistic.

If we match the offer then it is too the trade table...Forget about mentioning Hawks got only pick 19 etc...too the trade table.
What is he worth on the trade table??? Easily 2x 1st rounders + decent player
So what is unrealsitic about that?
You been reading too much of Jay Clarks propaganda where "his" exper said a 1st and 2nd rounder is fair...**** right off you wanking campaigner Jay

 

[1990crow]

At the price that you guys in this thread are hoping your CEO demands, yes you'd need to do a lot of convincing. But it won't happen, as your demands are too high and Fagan isn't an idiot. Fagan can get "the best deal imaginable" and you guys will be cold, because what you want is unrealistic.

I've seen no suggestions in here that are outlandish. 2 first rounders and Murdoch seems the average. That would be unders for what Danger is.

 

[TrainRoo32]

What's this shit on the tiser about GHS and us wanting him