You know, it's almost like GFC supporters feel like since they are at a starting point of paying zero (i.e. AFC not matching a RFA bid), that they don't need to pay fair value. That the trade they will end up with will cost less due to starting from a lower point.
Let's say I'm selling a car, and the car is worth $10k. Someone comes in and offers $1k. Just because they offered less, doesn't mean I'll accept less than whatever is the least I'll take. The least I'll take is decided only by me, and how weak or strong I am in my convictions.
AFC will have a value they believe PD is worth, GFC will too. The resulting trade will come out somewhere in between the two values, regardless of how low GFC start or how high AFC start.
When I sell my car, I push it's value; low km's, full service history, new tyres, etc. PD's value is more subjective, but in the end will be measured by a combination of his contract value and the players/picks traded. Nobody here knows what that will be.
If Pendelbury was up this year and wanted to come to Adelaide i would give up two first rounders and CEY in a heartbeat to get him in the team, but go figure why Cats supportesrs dont think Danger is worth that?






