- Banned
- #2,551
How much would you pay to keep Dan out?$600m to keep the Liberals out is a bargain![]()
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
How much would you pay to keep Dan out?$600m to keep the Liberals out is a bargain![]()
āPower for people, not profitā. That was Danās spin for the rebirth of the SEC. And voters fell for it! A promise of the government handing over $1B to the SEC to create 4.5gigawatts of renewable energy, the creation of 59,000 jobs, cheaper power, and emissions cut by 80%.Time for another victory lap?
The man was a visionary.
More like hot airDan the master illusionist
Promising a pot of gold
But delivering a lump of coal
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
One way of being a member of royal Canberra golf clubDan Andrews for First President of the Republic of Australia!!!![]()
We canāt even get any Victorians in the Test teamDan Andrews for First President of the Republic of Australia!!!![]()
Dan Andrews for First President and Bill Lawry for First Australian Cricket Team Selector!!!We canāt even get any Victorians in the Test team
Sand pit is too full of crabs...He is more than likely trying to find a loophole for his current and ongoing endeavoursThey should just cut the crap and give Dan the Australian ambassador role in China!
The Victorian government approved a secret taxpayer-funded bailout of Tennis Australia on the eve of the last state election, just four months before record crowds flooded back to Melbourne Park for last yearās bumper Australian Open.
The previously undisclosed āsolvency and cash flow supportā payment of up to $63 million, approved by Treasurer Tim Pallas on September 1, 2022, was purportedly made so that Tennis Australia could pay its bills after its cash reserves were depleted by the additional cost of staging successive tournaments during the pandemic, documents obtained under freedom-of-information laws reveal.
The contingency was approved about the same time the government forgave a $40 million loan made to Tennis Australia in February 2021 to cover additional costs at the height of the pandemic.
The Victorian government approved a secret taxpayer-funded bailout of Tennis Australia on the eve of the last state election, just four months before record crowds flooded back to Melbourne Park for last yearās bumper Australian Open.
The previously undisclosed āsolvency and cash flow supportā payment of up to $63 million, approved by Treasurer Tim Pallas on September 1, 2022, was purportedly made so that Tennis Australia could pay its bills after its cash reserves were depleted by the additional cost of staging successive tournaments during the pandemic, documents obtained under freedom-of-information laws reveal.
The contingency was approved about the same time the government forgave a $40 million loan made to Tennis Australia in February 2021 to cover additional costs at the height of the pandemic.
I would be interested to hear the justification for paying $100 million of public monies to be, effectively, handed on to a group of multi-millionaire tennis players.The Victorian government approved a secret taxpayer-funded bailout of Tennis Australia on the eve of the last state election, just four months before record crowds flooded back to Melbourne Park for last yearās bumper Australian Open.
The previously undisclosed āsolvency and cash flow supportā payment of up to $63 million, approved by Treasurer Tim Pallas on September 1, 2022, was purportedly made so that Tennis Australia could pay its bills after its cash reserves were depleted by the additional cost of staging successive tournaments during the pandemic, documents obtained under freedom-of-information laws reveal.
The contingency was approved about the same time the government forgave a $40 million loan made to Tennis Australia in February 2021 to cover additional costs at the height of the pandemic.
They'll probably say that "money talks."I would be interested to hear the justification for paying $100 million of public monies to be, effectively, handed on to a group of multi-millionaire tennis players.
![]()
2022 Australian Open serves up AUS$267.3m boost to Victorian economy, says study - SportsPro
The Australian Open tennis Grand Slam has contributed AUS$2.71bn to the local economy in the last ten years.www.sportspromedia.com
Tennisā Australian Open generated AUS$405.3 million (US$282.3 million) in economic benefit during its 2021 and 2022 editions, according to a new report by analytics firm Nielsen Sports.
The 2022 tournament generated AUS$267.3 million (US$186.5 million) in Real Gross State Product, while last yearās Australian Open generated AUS$138 million (US$96.3 million). Restrictions meant the figures were below pre-pandemic levels, with the 2020 tournament generating AUS$387.7 million (US$270.5 million).
Over the past ten years, the Grand Slam has contributed AUS$2.71 billion (US$1.89 billion) to the Victorian economy...
In all fairness, perhaps the justification is "we, the Government, imposed a bunch of requirements on Tennis Australia that cost them money, so we agreed to give them some cash so we could keep the Oz Open here". Nowhere near the mistake in scale or judgement that the Comm Games were.
I've got no issue with supporting the AO particularly if there was any truth to the stories about Sydney and Shanghai circling for it. What is unacceptable is that the handout was shrouded in the usual Andrews government secrecy.If Dimopoulos'(hope spelling is correct) figures are to be believed, the AusOpen will generate 4billion $ into the state economy over the period extension facilitated/fast-tracked by this payment.
While I agree with your last line, still have a major issue with this not being transparently disclosed at the time. 'IF' there is justification, then spell it out so people have context.
None of these types of figures are ever right.If Dimopoulos'(hope spelling is correct) figures are to be believed, the AusOpen will generate 4billion $ into the state economy over the period extension facilitated/fast-tracked by this payment.
While I agree with your last line, still have a major issue with this not being transparently disclosed at the time. 'IF' there is justification, then spell it out so people have context.
None of these types of figures are ever right.
All these figures are based on a report commissioned by Tennis Australia and released the same month they received their bailout. I meanThe article link quoted earlier on this page says 2.7 billion the last 10 years, not too much of a stretch to accept 4 billion for the next 10 - but yes to your point - what is the 2.7 billion past figure based on to justify the 4 billion future figure? It's obvious the volume of visitors, and therefore accommodation, retail, hospitality, etc expenses, but are they based on a delta to the 2 weeks prior with the same holiday period scenario?
