- Banned
- #201
cschreuder61 said:
Your flat mates are idiots too.
WHat about Houlihan's hit on the WCE guy this year?
And that pig Notting on Caracella?
It doesnt work that way.
-
Mobile App Discontinued
Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Didak Cleared
- Thread starter >A<
- Start date
- Tagged users None
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
Your flat mates are idiots too.
WHat about Houlihan's hit on the WCE guy this year?
And that pig Notting on Caracella?
It doesnt work that way.
That's absolutely unbelievable. **** the AFL and **** Collingwood.
MarkT said:
Linda Something... Linda Scotland?
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
MarkT said:
That's fair.
Interesting though that the vast majority of supporters of 15 other clubs agree that it was a suspendable offence.
Are you going to respond to any other of my comments? Or just going to pick that part of my post to respond to?
captain amazo said:
Wow - the auto censor is blocking out "God-bless" these days.
Regards
S. Pete
Re: SEN - Didak Cleared
Hollihan and Hodge both got off on similar incidents. Beau Waters got off when a bloke had his head over the ball. So no Didak is not the first to get off for that kind of incident.
G-Mo77 said:Amen to that.
Poor decision had this been Pickett or Guerra they would have been looking at a 4 match ban minimum.
But the good news is that now every other player that does something similar to this has a case and shouldn't be suspended for it.
Hollihan and Hodge both got off on similar incidents. Beau Waters got off when a bloke had his head over the ball. So no Didak is not the first to get off for that kind of incident.
In what is the most controversial match review decision of the 2006 season so far, the panel ruled that Didak's contact on Scotland was accidental.
Is this some kind of sick joke?
Is this some kind of sick joke?
The vast majority of supporters from the other 15 clubs always want our players rubbed out, whats new?Ari said:
just trying to figure out how many weeks byron picket would have got for the same incident ???
absolute joke, the way the tribunal system is run these days wouldnt've been suprised me if scotland was suspended for having his head in the way.
absolute joke, the way the tribunal system is run these days wouldnt've been suprised me if scotland was suspended for having his head in the way.
The elbow for mine, was tucked in at the last moment. It wasnt so much the elbow itself as it was head high contact for mine.MarkT said:
Specifically id love to hear your thoughts on the following "Didak's action was viewed as a legitimate attempt to bump. Therefore, the contact to the head was considered accidental and the action was not considered to be a reportable offence."
If a player makes head high contact then it's a free kick. Furthermore if it's deemed to be reckless, which it was, then it becomes a reportable offence. MMM went through it on the radio and came up with the same as me, 3-4 weeks down to 1-2 weeks.
What are your thoughts on some of my comments below?
The match day report laid against Collingwood's Alan Didak was reviewed.
-Yes.
It was the view of the Match Review Panel that Scotland took possession of the ball and Didak began to moved towards him from the side and slightly behind the Carlton player. Scotland first realised his opponent was approaching when he was approximately two metres away.
-So Scotland realised "oh crap, here comes Dids on a mission"... got it.
Didak had positioned himself to bump and had his arm and shoulder tucked in for contact.
-So Didak was coming from the side and behind and had braced himself to make heavy contact with Scotland who had only just realised he was coming.
Scotland attempted to avoid contact but unfortunately contact was made to his head.
-So Scotland tried to avoid the approaching Didak, but couldnt get away from him time... okay.
Despite the high contact,
-See photo above
Didak's action was viewed as a legitimate attempt to bump.
-But he caught him high and did severe damage! Isnt that reckless at least??
Therefore, the contact to the head was considered accidental and the action was not considered to be a reportable offence.
-An accident? But he was running toward him from the side and behind braced for contact which was made to the head causing harm to the player.... again, see photo above.
Ari said:
Listen to the basic facts.
1, Bumping is permitted in AFL football
2. There is no offside rule, you can approach the player from behind,
3. Didaks arm was tucked perfectly at the point of impact - photos of the "follow through" are irrelevant.
4. Didaks feet were on the ground
5. Incidental and accidental contact happens every week. Just because its a free kick doesnt make it reportable.
6. Scotland had the ball and was fair game.
7. The presence of blood does not make an accident reportable.
Every time somebody gets suspended for soemething 50/50, everybody cries poor about the game going soft, turning into netball etc etc. Yet as soon as somebody executes the perfect hip and shoulder, where are these people who should be applauding it??? NOWHERE - the hypocrites change teams!!!
Kade Simps
Rookie
- Jul 31, 2006
- 37
- 0
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Who gives a **** wat club he is from, what he did was absolutely disgusting and deserved to be rubbed out for atleast 2. it is an absolute disgrace that he got cleared of anything, he almost killed scotland and they deemed it accidental IS THE MATCH REVIEW PANEL F****** BLIND. Bannister's crappy little jumper punch added up to a 3 match ban but because of clean record got taken down to 1 and didak got nothing. I am absolutely appalled with that descision. Ofcourse Collingwodd player gets off with nothing!eddiesmith said:The vast majority of supporters from the other 15 clubs always want our players rubbed out, whats new?
Kade Simps
Rookie
- Jul 31, 2006
- 37
- 0
- AFL Club
- Carlton
Timmy from Thomastown said:
You call that a perfect hip and shoulder. You call that a fair bump and not head high. How the hell was he concussed and bleading from the fore head. Scotland looked like he had been belted by a raging bull.
Kade Simps said:
It was too high and therefore a free kick. Apart from that it was totally legitimate.
buddha
Debutant
Re: SEN - Didak Cleared
collingwood supporters wanted to hang jamie charman with his hit on rocca earlier in the year and now try to defend didak for doing the same if not worse.
collingwood supporters wanted to hang jamie charman with his hit on rocca earlier in the year and now try to defend didak for doing the same if not worse.
🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.
If that was Riccuito, 5 weeks.
Re: SEN - Didak Cleared
But Charman wasnt charged. The tribunal set the precedence with Charman, Notting, and Giasuracusa. Those cases are exactly why Didak should have got off.
buddha said:
But Charman wasnt charged. The tribunal set the precedence with Charman, Notting, and Giasuracusa. Those cases are exactly why Didak should have got off.
Re: SEN - Didak Cleared
Agree- why is it ok for fullbacks to hold fevola? it happens every week and there was a ridiculous one near the goal post in the second quarter. I had to laugh when they didn't pay that one - even blind freddy could see it. It was easily the worst umpired match i have seen for at least 3 years.
Didak is collingwood's most important player. forget Buckley - didak is more important, but he did the crime, so he does the time. 3 weeks penalty minimum in the real world. In the afl's wacky world he will probably get a pay rise. Typical collingwood tactic. go the biff.
The Old Dark Navy's said:
Agree- why is it ok for fullbacks to hold fevola? it happens every week and there was a ridiculous one near the goal post in the second quarter. I had to laugh when they didn't pay that one - even blind freddy could see it. It was easily the worst umpired match i have seen for at least 3 years.
Didak is collingwood's most important player. forget Buckley - didak is more important, but he did the crime, so he does the time. 3 weeks penalty minimum in the real world. In the afl's wacky world he will probably get a pay rise. Typical collingwood tactic. go the biff.
Re: SEN - Didak Cleared
Charman got 1 week.
Get Notting's name out of there, both were going for the ball.
Timmy from Thomastown said:
Charman got 1 week.
Get Notting's name out of there, both were going for the ball.
No, he isn't a thug, and your definately right about the Collingwood thing...Murray said:
Similar threads
