Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
If he went up to Brisbane, even just to look around and have a casual chat, that would be a real slap in the face, all things considered.
Well, we can only wait and see at this stage.
Neeld / Dawes?Without doing any research, anyone know of recent assistant coaches who have gone to another team as senior coach and taken a player with him?
No I am saying that the parameters that you are using to distinguish Cotchin from Dusty, and why Cotchin justifies a much higher rate are ill conceived, as a player such as Dane Swan possesses none of Cotchin's attributes and can still attract a higher rate of pay. Not comparing Dane to Dusty at all, just I would put Dusty's real worth at somewhere just below Cotchins. And still maintain that his worth to the team is somewhere higher than lids, based on lids performance this year. The carap about Dusty needing minders is hearsay and shouldn't even be taken seriously. I have minders too - they are called mates!Dane Swan thanks to bench management can play out four quarters. I cannot believe you think Dustys output is on par with Swans.
Won't be surprised if the Carr show continues with a trip to Brisbane. That will be a new low, poking around the Gabba with Carr marshaling the cameras.
Any normal manager picks up the friggen phone.
Just to hand. Here we go again.
http://www.news.com.au/sport/afl/br...ial-trade-target/story-fnfll94y-1226726760048
No we would be paying what he is worth to the club. Maybe not 700ks, but certainly only slightly less than cotch. And only for a period of time where if he were to have a bad year we wouldn't be locked into a longer deal.
Re lids being tagged, why can Garry ablett lose his tags (except Daniel Jackson) and lids can't? He has a role but we are paying him mega bucks and often don't think he is trying hard enough. When he's not being tagged he is usually bog, not sure he is worth the amount he is on based on his performance this year.
Gut feel is leppa knows Dusty is is best off at rfc.
Im confident Leppa wont dog us.![]()
The Buzz said this morning that it would be embarrassing for Dusty to go back this week with his tail between his legs asking for the contact again so we may have to wait until next week.
No I am saying that the parameters that you are using to distinguish Cotchin from Dusty, and why Cotchin justifies a much higher rate are ill conceived, as a player such as Dane Swan possesses none of Cotchin's attributes and can still attract a higher rate of pay. Not comparing Dane to Dusty at all, just I would put Dusty's real worth at somewhere just below Cotchins. And still maintain that his worth to the team is somewhere higher than lids, based on lids performance this year. The carap about Dusty needing minders is hearsay and shouldn't even be taken seriously. I have minders too - they are called mates!
Okay, you think Dusty's value is just below Cotchins, and above Deledios. Quantify it.
Deledio and Cotchin provide $100-200k worth of marketing value EACH to the club. Martin does virtually none.
Deledio and Cotchin both play out four quarters, Dusty still struggles to do this.
One of Deledio or Cotchin get the main tag each week from the opposition, Dusty is rarely tagged.
Cotchin lives in the midfield, Deledio is there for the bulk of the game, Dusty needs to spend more time forward to last out the game.
Exactly where does Martin's value come from to justify the "he's just below Cotchin" claim?
cotchin 19 brownie votes ---- dusty 16![]()