essendon taking it to the tribunal. lloyd

[Longy413]

lloyd just a dog give him 2 [what a girl]

That would make him a bitch I guess...

 

[DaSawx]

That would make him a bitch I guess...

From Geelong, probably can't distinguish the difference between a girl and a dog, just get confused

 

[PUSSIES_07_FLAG]

Yeah I'll miss his 1 goal and 2 gimme goals from dives 20m out.

It might rubbish our otherwise 100 point win. Costing us a few valuable %.

 

[lohnro]

i hope for one he gets off, that was soft
plus id rather watch the boys play essedon at full strength

 

[ablett5]

From Geelong, probably can't distinguish the difference between a girl and a dog, just get confused

yeah i can ya mum is definetly a dog and full forwards definetly a girl

 

[DaSawx]

yeah i can ya mum is definetly a dog and full forwards definetly a girl

You are like so awesome at name calling, can I be your best friend

 

[M29]

yeah i'll miss the 2 goals he would kick against us

Been spending a few nights out on the town with your namesake have you?

 

[windyhill]

yeah i can ya mum is definetly a dog and full forwards definetly a girl

Poor poor Aleisha.

 

[cat_fanatic]

Bad luck Lloyd... footage inconclusive - worth a try though.

 

[Longy413]

How can the MRP give a suspension on inconclusive footage?

Or did they go purely on the word from the umpire?

 

[knakkers]

welcome to bizaro world bombers

 

[Smokin]

an amazingly perplexing decision.

Id be in total shock if I had any faith or gave this whole tribunal system any credibility.

Are we appealing this?

I keep thinking back to Fev and Goodes...ah **** it, if this and Hirds 250th cant spur us to play out of our skins, nothing will.

 

[Il Naso De Gastev]

an amazingly perplexing decision.

Id be in total shock if I had any faith or gave this whole tribunal system any credibility.

Are we appealing this?

I keep thinking back to Fev and Goodes...ah **** it, if this and Hirds 250th cant spur us to play out of our skins, nothing will.

Fev on Didak was different (if that's the one you're referring to). Didak saw him coming, granted at the last second, and he fell to the ground to milk it. The contact was minimal.

Lloyd's is very similar to Goodes though.... however they successfully argued that it was a strike, not a charge. BS I know, but technically correct (in the tribunal's opinion anyway). To my knowledge, Essendon used the same tactic and failed. IMO the footage was pretty conclusive. If the contact had have been made front on he wouldn't have got cited, but because he hit him square in the back and Carroll has no idea he was there, that was the killer.

 

[mathew ollaik]

We should appeal again.