- Joined
- Jul 19, 2010
- Posts
- 3,477
- Reaction score
- 5,395
- Location
- Adelaide
- AFL Club
- Adelaide
- Other Teams
- Sturt, Liverpool, San Antonio Spurs
Lets just bend them over doggie style!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Lets just bend them over doggie style!
Generalise much. A few posters say things doesn't mean the whole supporter base thinks it.Fitness was not an issue with either GWS or WB they just got beaten by better teams on the day, if their theory is correct GWS could have lost by 100 pts after trailing by so much at half time however they ran and fought out the game well. Clutching at straws
There also saying Danger is not a genuine star and is a flat track Bully that beats up on weak opposition and struggles against good sides, lucky we are playing a bottom 8 side this week
Gotta say this is pretty much my pet peeve on here at times. Far too many generalizations tossed about at times without just addressing specific poster points of view. Feel free to consider this another exampleGeneralise much. A few posters say things doesn't mean the whole supporter base thinks it.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
hmm Richmond, Essendon and Port so they haven't hard a soft draw. Beating West Coast is a decent effort so they don't actually look too bad.
Seeing as posters are not supposed to grab quotes from individual posters or refer to individual posters from other boards and threads, it's not so easy to avoid generalisations. Perhaps TSR should change his post to read "Some Western bulldogs posters believe….", or perhaps "there are a couple of posts that suggest…"Gotta say this is pretty much my pet peeve on here at times. Far too many generalizations tossed about at times without just addressing specific poster points of view. Feel free to consider this another example![]()
There also saying Danger is not a genuine star and is a flat track Bully that beats up on weak opposition and struggles against good sides
Generalise much. A few posters say things doesn't mean the whole supporter base thinks it.
Gotta say this is pretty much my pet peeve on here at times. Far too many generalizations tossed about at times without just addressing specific poster points of view. Feel free to consider this another example![]()
Wow touchy much.Get over it..... It's a footy forum and I was making reference to a discussion item on your board, I never said the entire WB forum believed that Danger is over-rated and I'm not going to do a full analysis and provide what % of WB forum members support or oppose the Dangerfield statement
Wow touchy much.
Really... kick inaccurately, after a poor start and go down honourablyHopefully we treat the game like a final...

Sure do champ. Good luck for today all, fwiw I'm not overly confident from our perspective. Your form in the last couple has been good and no matter what oppositions thoughts on Danger he can tear games apart. And from memory it was Wallis last year on him and Cross on Sloane who did decent jobs but aren't playing. Add to that Minson's struggles and Jacobs resurgence I'm not confident at all.Mate if you got nothing further tobadd on the game, you know where the door is
Sure do champ. Good luck for today all, fwiw I'm not overly confident from our perspective. Your form in the last couple has been good and no matter what oppositions thoughts on Danger he can tear games apart. And from memory it was Wallis last year on him and Cross on Sloane who did decent jobs but aren't playing. Add to that Minson's struggles and Jacobs resurgence I'm not confident at all.
But good luck and here's to no injuries!
Added one to the game day threadAny chance you could do a poll Drugs Are Bad Mackay? I would be curious as to what supporters think about this game tomorrow.