Society/Culture Feminism part 1 - continued in part 2

[tesseract]

Ok Ill bite:

That site is Free Thought Blogs. It used to be an Atheist hub, but it got co-opted by feminists and SJW's. Atheists have abandoned that place in droves ever since. Many an Atheist even say that FTB has lost any and all credibility it once may have had. So, there's no point responding to shit that site spews out, for it's now Feminist Thought Blogs.

 

[scon]

Men don't need too buy the cow, so to speak, because they get the sex for free.

Nooice!
Classy!
Sound economics!

 

[tesseract]

Also;Alleged rapists/sexual offenders should be castrated and forced to undergo hormonal therapy (Increasing estrogen/lowering testosterone)

This is feminism, for they hold the view that masculinity is toxic. Hence they're trying to get rid of it, in one way or the other. One isn't well read on the issue of feminism if they haven't come across the feminist term 'toxic masculinity'.

 

[romeoh]

Pankhurst was at the forefront of the white feather campaign. How can she be about the suffragette movement when she seeks inequality that favours women in the form of having the vote for women and not having to fight in the war, unlike men, to earn the right to vote? She contradicts 'suffrage'! So, it's not a matter of class, it was a matter of gender, as well as her shameless and vile acts. Feminist revisionist history paints her as a saint for her deeds, but that's because feminism isn't about equality.

Pankhurst and her mob were handing out white ribbons to boys as young as 14 in an attempt to shame them into service, and thus throwing away their lives in the war. This woman has much blood on her hands! This same mob were handing out white ribbons to men who had returned from the war who were recovering from wounds. The so-called women's suffragettes had no shame it seems... or conscience. Yet feminists hold these women up as heroines of the feminist movement. How unsurprising.

Try re-reading the thread and looking into links. It's no one else's obligation to keep you up to date and informed.

Ah, I see you didn't answer my questions so I will help you out. Yes the Pankhursts were at the forefront of the suffragette movement and yes, they were from the middle classes. Oh and of course, debunked by 'you'. Thank you, that is all you needed to say.

 

[cartwright]

Which statement exactly did you have a problem with?

You said that feminists state there are no decent men out there. I'm refuting that.

Are you actually going to address any of my answers?

... am I meant to?

 

[tesseract]

Ah, I see you didn't answer my questions so I will help you out. Yes the Pankhursts were at the forefront of the suffragette movement and yes, they were from the middle classes. Oh and of course, debunked by 'you'. Thank you, that is all you needed to say.

Again, try re-reading this thread and other feminism-related threads and looking into the links, you'll find your questions have been answered. It's no one else's obligation to keep you up to date and informed. Try to keep up.

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

Also;

Alleged rapists/sexual offenders should be castrated and forced to undergo hormonal therapy (Increasing estrogen/lowering testosterone)

What a stupid statement.

 

[kfc1]

Also;

Alleged rapists/sexual offenders should be castrated and forced to undergo hormonal therapy (Increasing estrogen/lowering testosterone)

I allege ur a rapist
#devo

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

Oh great, another nutjob. Who's alias are you?

Kynge of Begrem

No surprise there.

If I am not very much mistaken, he/she is arguing that those statements are 'feminist myths' rather than stating his/her opinion, but, agree 100 per cent that he/she is a nut-job and it is a positive development that you also do.

 

[cartwright]

Nooice!
Classy!
Sound economics!

ha... women love to be equated to a cow, didntyaknow?

 

[scon]

Ohh...
OK Daisy!
So Tessie's a smooth talking cow-magnet??

 

[fleabitten]

Check this idiot out: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/dec/16/ban-men-2014-women-misandry

"Ban men, we said when tweeting a link about the latest rape apology or nude photo theft. #KillAllMen. Launch men into space. I can’t wait until we send them all to Dude Island. We were joking, sort of, but we were also very serious."

"I’d rather identify as something that celebrates the togetherness we’ve found under the “#KillAllMen” banner."

 

[romeoh]

Again, try re-reading this thread and other feminism-related threads and looking into the links, you'll find your questions have been answered. It's no one else's obligation to keep you up to date and informed. Try to keep up.

Uhuh- funnily enough the one failing to keep on track to said discussion was actually you.
You will be surprised to know that I have pretty well zero interest in your rather unbalanced, persecution-fuelled, pretty venomous rants about 'feminism and other stuff', so please see if you can just maintain focus and simply respond to the question asked.
Goodo -let's see how you go shall we?

 

[Raz0r6ack]

Check this idiot out: http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/dec/16/ban-men-2014-women-misandry

"Ban men, we said when tweeting a link about the latest rape apology or nude photo theft. #KillAllMen. Launch men into space. I can’t wait until we send them all to Dude Island. We were joking, sort of, but we were also very serious."

"I’d rather identify as something that celebrates the togetherness we’ve found under the “#KillAllMen” banner."

Women like this are just broken human beings.

 

[scon]

Or just another with limited understanding like the rest of us.

 

[Vic Vinegar]

You said that feminists state there are no decent men out there. I'm refuting that.




... am I meant to?

Refute means to prove something false, ergo providing evidence providing said statement false. You havent provided anything, nor have you actually refuted my first seven rebuttals, thereby declaring them true.

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

Refute means to prove something false, ergo providing evidence providing said statement false. You havent provided anything, nor have you actually refuted my first seven rebuttals, thereby declaring them true.

If someone doesn't refute a claim that someone else makes, they are declaring the said claim true?

That would have to be one of the stupidest things I have read on this site, and this is coming from someone who frequents the Punting Board.

 

[Engimal]

I've already answered questions that disprove your views earlier in this thread and in other feminism-related threads. Try to keep up.

The thing is, I don't think you have. You haven't disproved anything. You just have a different opinion, which is fine, but it's far from fact.

 

[cartwright]

The thing is, I don't think you have. You haven't disproved anything. You just have a different opinion, which is fine, but it's far from fact.

you know this is only going to result in another wall of text, that tesseract will copy/paste from one of his hate sites, right?!

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

The thing is, I don't think you have. You haven't disproved anything. You just have a different opinion, which is fine, but it's far from fact.

The problem is that you are trying to have a rational discussion with a deeply irrational poster, who genuinely believes that UFOs are demons.

Further to that, he genuinely believes that these demons have infiltrated the highest places of power in governments. And, of course, they can also change shape and make themselves invisible - what? You didn't know that?

The powerful elite (you know the ones that 'wield more power than those in the highest places in the government), they're in on it too.

You think I'm kidding, right?

What Jerome Nelson describes at 12:15 of the video is shown in captured footage by NASA, which was subsequently released and shown on YouTube. I believe these are spirit beings - fallen/former angels, what the bible calls demons, who rebelled against God and were cast out of heaven by Jesus, down to the vicinity of the earth.
NASA has supposedly recorded these beings taking right angle turns while traveling at 65,000 miles per hour. Such supposedly defies the laws of physics. This is possible for such beings because they are supernatural. Changing shape and making themselves visible and then invisible to human eyes is possible for them.
I believe that some of those in the highest places of power in governments, as well as some of the elites, know exactly what these beings are, but are being tight lipped in regards to this information because they're secretly in league with the demons, and are carrying out a demonic agenda. The powers and principalities that's spoken of in the bible at Ephesians 6:12 are these demons. They are the power ruling and manipulating world events from behind not only the highest positions in governments, but the powerful elite who wield more power than those in the highest places in government.
Those in the Air-Force may classify these things "UFO's," but these things called UFO's by some, aren't unidentified to everyone.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

"I believe that some of those in the highest places of power in governments, as well as some of the elites, know exactly what these beings are, but are being tight lipped in regards to this information because they're secretly in league with the demons, and are carrying out a demonic agenda".

I agree.

 

[cartwright]

The problem is that you are trying to have a rational discussion with a deeply irrational poster, who genuinely believes that UFOs are demons.

Further to that, he genuinely believes that these demons have infiltrated the highest places of power in governments. And, of course, they can also change shape and make themselves invisible - what? You didn't know that?

The powerful elite (you know the ones that 'wield more power than those in the highest places in the government), they're in on it too.

You think I'm kidding, right?

nope.

 

[Kynge of Begrem]

Hence my comment wrt Obama. He's part of the system being overseen and directed by Satan.

 

[scon]

Who needs Don Chipp??

 

[Little Big John]

Links pls KoB?

I need to know the "context" in order to fully assess the hilarity I'm experiencing.