- Joined
- Mar 10, 2007
- Posts
- 29,393
- Reaction score
- 17,534
- Location
- Ensconced in velvet
- AFL Club
- Sydney
- Other Teams
- Lakers, West Ham
I was sure there was already a Polls Board thread comparing the two but all I could find was the Bay 13 edition.
There was a lot of discussion in 2010 about whether or not Hannebery really was the best rising star that year due to Martin also having a great season but being ineligible.
Hannebery has the advantage of coming within a bee's dick of a Norm Smith and having a more than stellar finals series against three quality opponents (averaged 30 touches in finals).
There was a lot of discussion in 2010 about whether or not Hannebery really was the best rising star that year due to Martin also having a great season but being ineligible.
Just as a guideline, here are their career stats (averages).
Hannebery / Martin
K: 9.9 / 12.3
H: 11.0 / 9.2
G: 0.3 / 1.1
T: 3.1 / 3.2
Hannebery has the advantage of coming within a bee's dick of a Norm Smith and having a more than stellar finals series against three quality opponents (averaged 30 touches in finals).






) he could become one of the games best.