- Joined
- Sep 30, 2005
- Posts
- 59,437
- Reaction score
- 64,477
- Location
- Perth
- AFL Club
- Fremantle
- Other Teams
- Freo and Bulldogs, ManU
He'll get off on insufficient force...which is completely correct but a disgrace given past events...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Fantasy Footy Notice Image Round 7
SuperCoach Rd 7 SC Talk - Trade Talk - Capt/VC ,//, AFL Fantasy Rd 7 AFF Talk - AF Trades - Capt/VC
Don't you mean Sydney?Gone ... Doesn't play for Geelong so standard rules apply.

Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Other than "Insufficient Force" that would be the only way he could get offDoesn't deserve to be suspended even in H&A for that, let alone miss a Prelim for it. Neither did Fyfe, but there's no way that can be changed now anyway. Is it possible it can be referred straight to the Tribunal so then it doesn't have to go through the MRP grading system and then get him just a warning?
If he does miss next week though, he's only got himself to blame. Just silly.
Based on what? The vibe of the thing? Everything points to him getting a ban based on the current laws and previous suspensions for the same thing.If MRP are stupid enough to give him a game, North will appeal and win.
Doesn't deserve to be suspended even in H&A for that, let alone miss a Prelim for it. Neither did Fyfe, but there's no way that can be changed now anyway. Is it possible it can be referred straight to the Tribunal so then it doesn't have to go through the MRP grading system and then get him just a warning?
If he does miss next week though, he's only got himself to blame. Just silly.
Other than "Insufficient Force" that would be the only way he could get off
Warning? He just came back from a 3 week suspension where his current 40% loading wasn't applied.
Based on what? The vibe of the thing?
Playing the Swans.
Gone.
Yeah, but the two reports were for remarkably different infringements and do you REALLY think that this incident deserves a week off (if you disregard the unfair suspension put onto Fyfe)?
Basically, yes. The tribunal have the authority to throw out punishments they feel are not warranted, even if they are there by the letter of the law.
Of course it doesn't deserve a week... it deserves 2!
Nah, no way this type of stuff should get done, but as stated the MRP have made their bed with the Fyfe decision and they had the opportunity to say they got it wrong, but stuck to their guns.
Don't think you're anywhere close to being in before.In before "playing the Swans. Gone".
My feeling is that they'll use this decision (allowing Harvey to play) to be their way of saying "we were wrong" without ever actually having to admit that they were wrong with the Fyfe suspension. I'd rather them make the right decision now, then make the wrong decision just to make a previous wrong decision appear right.
I don't think the review panel will take lightly to the fact that the player has come back from a misconduct matter and again acts in a similar silly way. Will either get given a holiday or get given a free trip to the tribunal.Harvey should get off there was bugger all in that.
Based on what? The vibe of the thing? Everything points to him getting a ban based on the current laws and previous suspensions for the same thing.
He's gone unless Selwood's cut was caused by previous contact, then he might get away with insufficient force.