I think there's an assumption Tigers are behind the Eagles as we started the rebuild later, but I don't think it's the reality.
If we look at Player Ratings for 2025, in addition to age profile, Richmond got more quality football from their youngsters in 2025 than the Eagles. And given Richmond took 7 x picks in the top-30 of a very strong draft, and 5 of those 7 aren't in the list below so it's hard to not regard Richmond's cohort of youth a lot more promising.
After 4 x years with 11 x wins Eagles supporters 'should' be ahead, but there's nothing much in the data or to the eye that makes the reality.
Player Ratings Rankings 2025:
#1: Taranto. 27yo
#2: Baker 27yo (1-day older than Taranto)
#3: Prestia 33yo
#4: McGovern
#5: Graham 27yo (a month younger than Taranto)
#6: T Young 27yo
#7: Vlastuin 31yo
#8: McCarthy 25yo
#9: Hopper 28yo
#10: Campbell 21yo
#11: Ross 25yo
#12: Edwards 25yo
#13: Gray 22yo
#14: H Reid 20yo
#15: Lalor 19yo
#16: Kelly 31yo
#17: Brock 23yo
#18: Ginbey 21yo
#19: McCauliffe 20yo
#20: Cole 28yo
#21: Ryan 29yo (gone)
#22: Ralphsmith 24yo
#23: Miller: 26yo
#24: Hotton: 19yo
#25: Brown: 22yo
How can McGovern be ranked at 4 in 2025?





