MadBomberman
Cancelled
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2011
- Posts
- 987
- Reaction score
- 220
- Location
- Melbourne
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Man U, Melbourne Heart, Bulls
Can everyone wait until the investigation is over before forming an opinion or ranting? The media doesn't have all the information, nor do all the little Bigfooty google specialists. I don't have an opinion about this issue and I won't have one until the investigations are over. Essendon is guilty if they are, and not guilty if they are not. Simple. Unlike what many believe (without concrete evidence), we don't know that yet. Will the right decision be made? We will know after the investigation is COMPLETE and the findings are released.
Calls like AOD having performance enhancing effects that lasts until this year is beyond ridiculous. Has anyone who claims this performed a lengthy study on this? What are the findings/statistics/sample size?
Similarly, calls such as AOD not being performance enhancing are also ridiculous. I know that David Evans said this (as it seems like he has resources), but can we wait until the investigation is over to see why he said this?
I understand that this isn't the only criteria for the substance to be banned. Regardless, we don't know how many, if any (despite Jobe's admission), took AOD or any other peptide/drug/vitamin during last year. Maybe the coaches used it? Maybe it was the whole playing group and thus, Essendon may not be able to field a team next year? Maybe it was 4 players? Maybe ASADA screwed up? Maybe Essendon are innocent? Maybe guilty? All the speculations mean nothing until infraction notices are handed out to the players after the investigation or the club is cleared.
The media will sell anything to generate interest and we have seen many changes to their stories every week. This is why it is an unreliable source. How do people not know this yet?
Could it be accurate? We will know once the investigation is over.
I want it resolved as much as the next person, but a little patience will do. So lets just wait until the investigations are over. We have an exciting season so far and it looks to get even better
Calls like AOD having performance enhancing effects that lasts until this year is beyond ridiculous. Has anyone who claims this performed a lengthy study on this? What are the findings/statistics/sample size?
Similarly, calls such as AOD not being performance enhancing are also ridiculous. I know that David Evans said this (as it seems like he has resources), but can we wait until the investigation is over to see why he said this?
I understand that this isn't the only criteria for the substance to be banned. Regardless, we don't know how many, if any (despite Jobe's admission), took AOD or any other peptide/drug/vitamin during last year. Maybe the coaches used it? Maybe it was the whole playing group and thus, Essendon may not be able to field a team next year? Maybe it was 4 players? Maybe ASADA screwed up? Maybe Essendon are innocent? Maybe guilty? All the speculations mean nothing until infraction notices are handed out to the players after the investigation or the club is cleared.
The media will sell anything to generate interest and we have seen many changes to their stories every week. This is why it is an unreliable source. How do people not know this yet?
Could it be accurate? We will know once the investigation is over.
I want it resolved as much as the next person, but a little patience will do. So lets just wait until the investigations are over. We have an exciting season so far and it looks to get even better





