Hypothetical Trade Poll

[Kyusss]

if all other parties agreed would you do the following

Richmond Trade - 1st rounder (8) and 3rd Rounder (think its 42) To Freo
Fremantle Trade - 2nd rounder (think its 19) and Warnock To Richmond
Richmond Trade - Pick 19 and Dean Polo To sydney
Sydney Trade - Ryan O keefe To richmond

We get our Ruckman that we are looking at taking for pick 8
We get a quality marking forward who plays tall

I would probably do it than look to trade for an additional 2nd rounder
somewhere else, possibly schulz to Port

 

[rfctigerarmy]

R(Gain): O'Keefe, Warnock
R(Lose): 8, 42, Polo

No.

 

[dyl_tigerman]

o keefe 28 turning 29 and warnock has still not proven himself with only 21 games...
no way and plus losing polo and two young players one of which should be pretty good....

and o keefe could help but the problem is if we go for him we will do something stupid to get him

 

[bigpapagman]

thats our first three draft picks, shagger. what the shit? so we have one pick in the top 50 in trade for an old undersized (yet talented) forward & a relatively untried ruckman.

marvellous.

 

[sante]

ROK is too old and do you really need/want to trade for a HFF, even if they are good?

 

[bigrayohall20]

Terrible idea! Dont know why you would even think about that sort of trade.

 

[emperor]

Another thread to add to the junk pile

 

[GhostofJimJess]

Don't touch pick 8 under any circumstances - Chris Judd is not up for grabs this time around, nor anyone near his quality that would be what we require.

Trade out players superfluous to our needs, trade in players vital to our needs.

Leave the high draft picks alone.

 

[lvt06]

Pick 8 stays.

 

[Bojangles17]

**** NO, a 28yo + an unproven ruckman that demands a long term contract, would be close to the stupidest move we could possibly make

 

[Kyusss]

Was more a poll to see how highly rated a ruckman is for us
people say we need a ruck man and we will take one with pick 8
but not for warnock , warnock vs vickery and vickery is winning easily so far.

 

[Kyusss]

thats our first three draft picks, shagger. what the shit? so we have one pick in the top 50 in trade for an old undersized (yet talented) forward & a relatively untried ruckman.

marvellous.

no its our 1st and 3rd picks plus one we acquired and keeping our original 2nd
if we were to trade schulz for pick 20 or so
we would have

20 26 okeefe warnock
as oppossed to
8 26 42 polo

 

[dyl_tigerman]

no its our 1st and 3rd picks plus one we acquired and keeping our original 2nd
if we were to trade schulz for pick 20 or so
we would have

20 26 okeefe warnock
as oppossed to
8 26 42 polo

still no chance

 

[one eyedtiger]

Pick 8 stays.

agreed.

 

[Ah Cheung]

Please no.
In all honesty, even if we were to get Warnock and O'keefe, i don't see us improving a hell of a lot.