- Sep 14, 2005
- 18,419
- 18,686
Theres alot of negativity going around, as usual, so this isn't a change of scenary, simply an observation I made.
We were comprehensively beaten in the midfield, and pretty much every Collingwood player was beaten by his opposition which is evident in the fact that the top 10 players of today's game would probably include 9-10 St Kilda players. Anyway, to my question, would you consider it a positive that we were so comprehensively 'beaten' by the Saints, yet we only lost by 28 points?
Similarly to the Bulldogs game, we just did not turn up, yet only lost by around 4 goals as well, and both these sides are top 4 sides.
What do you make of this?
We were comprehensively beaten in the midfield, and pretty much every Collingwood player was beaten by his opposition which is evident in the fact that the top 10 players of today's game would probably include 9-10 St Kilda players. Anyway, to my question, would you consider it a positive that we were so comprehensively 'beaten' by the Saints, yet we only lost by 28 points?
Similarly to the Bulldogs game, we just did not turn up, yet only lost by around 4 goals as well, and both these sides are top 4 sides.
What do you make of this?


