Remove this Banner Ad

Joe Daniher

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why do you think I posed it as a question, not as an actual statement?

Given the unlikelihood of that scenario, it's a pretty pointless question.
 
The only thing that has been bleeding is the Essendon cheque book with legal fees and payouts to staff.

If it was the bleeding obvious why wouldn't the club announce as such? Are we expected to now believe everything we read in the paper? Or just when it suits an agenda....
As funny as it may sound, I don't think it's Essendon job to confirm or deny every conspiracy theory HTB posters wish to come up with.

It's also funny that no one believes anything Essendon say anymore... yet still want them to release a statement about whether Daniher has an IN or not...
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

If it's possible, then it's not a pointless question at all. In fact, its possibility is what is driving this thread's discussions right now.

A discussion on how you're running out of ideas.
 
As funny as it may sound, I don't think it's Essendon job to confirm or deny every conspiracy theory HTB posters wish to come up with.

It's also funny that no one believes anything Essendon say anymore... yet still want them to release a statement about whether Daniher has an IN or not...

So on that basis, whist he's not playing it is fair to assume that there is a possibility that he has received an IN. A long way away from "the bleeding obvious" as far as I'm concerned.
 
Yes, logic.

Like the "players cooperated but were cheering their club from the sidelines to have the investigation thrown out" logic.

Like the "we don't know what the players took, but they took nothing prohibited" logic.

Like the "it was just a chance meeting Charter and Hird met by a pool-side bar in Queensland" logic.

Like the "the AFL and ASADA are in a conspiracy against us" logic.

Like the "James Hird appealed to fight for the players, and for natural justice" logic.
I love that this ridiculous post is racking up likes. That's awesome
 
Lie to me Ian, tell me he was a listed AFL player in 2012
Shouldn't matter if he was on the list, if he was training there he would have been treated as well as if not better than anyone else to ensure he nominated for father son. It's like at my local club when blokes come down to train, we're not going to say you can't drink the cordial because your not on our list!
 
So why do you come here and why defend your club?

Yes we know you don't care about other clubs, such as St Kilda by playing a second string team while keeping your best players on some non competitive match simulation.

Hatred is a result of the way your club acts showing no regard for its players or other clubs or the competition, just do what suits you.
A valid question.

You don't care what anyone says but yet you are here examining the detail of all the things that you don't care about.

Cue response: don't know what - something tedious about HTB being comedy gold or whatever for EFC supporters.

If you really don't care what people say, you know what not do do...
 
So on that basis, whist he's not playing it is fair to assume that there is a possibility that he has received an IN. A long way away from "the bleeding obvious" as far as I'm concerned.
His mum has said he wasn't apart of the program. The Herald Sun say he doesn't have an infraction notice. Essendon have said he's available to play. First year under-19 players weren't apart of the program. AFL have included him in a list of players who aren't allowed to play our practice match because they could be playing NAB Cup instead.

I mean, how much proof do you want?
 

Remove this Banner Ad

His mum has said he wasn't apart of the program. The Herald Sun say he doesn't have an infraction notice. Essendon have said he's available to play. First year under-19 players weren't apart of the program. AFL have included him in a list of players who aren't allowed to play our practice match because they could be playing NAB Cup instead.

I mean, how much proof do you want?
Can you point me in the direction of the AFL lost of players not allowed to play in the intra-club?
 
Shouldn't matter if he was on the list, if he was training there he would have been treated as well as if not better than anyone else to ensure he nominated for father son. It's like at my local club when blokes come down to train, we're not going to say you can't drink the cordial because your not on our list!
If he wasnt a listed players there is no reason he would have been included in every program the listed players were offered. There is nothing to suggest he was involved in the program. His parents have claimed he wasnt.

But obviously he was :drunk:
 
If he wasnt a listed players there is no reason he would have been included in every program the listed players were offered. There is nothing to suggest he was involved in the program. His parents have claimed he wasnt.

But obviously he was :drunk:

Actually I have never said he was, just that their is a possibility he was. I don't know the answer. I would hope he isn't.

But the paranoia and defensiveness will clout any view being formed that doesn't suit you.
 
If he wasnt a listed players there is no reason he would have been included in every program the listed players were offered. There is nothing to suggest he was involved in the program. His parents have claimed he wasnt.

But obviously he was :drunk:

If it was categoric one way or the other then there would be no speculation.

You are probably correct Mexxy, but if it lands the other way, then the level of hurt will be exponential on what it looks like now.
 
His mum has said he wasn't apart of the program. The Herald Sun say he doesn't have an infraction notice. Essendon have said he's available to play. First year under-19 players weren't apart of the program. AFL have included him in a list of players who aren't allowed to play our practice match because they could be playing NAB Cup instead.

I mean, how much proof do you want?
They want a club press release
Which they won't believe
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

His mum has said he wasn't apart of the program. The Herald Sun say he doesn't have an infraction notice. Essendon have said he's available to play. First year under-19 players weren't apart of the program. AFL have included him in a list of players who aren't allowed to play our practice match because they could be playing NAB Cup instead.

I mean, how much proof do you want?
All that's missing is a letter from Dank.
 
Do non-Essendon supports not realize that we do not care what you think of us?

Why keep going on about people hating us after this? We gonna have a bad name after this? Are you trying to scare us?

I hate you and your club already, I didn't need a drug saga.

You have all probably researched more crap about drugs in sport because of this (to try and get a one up against Essendon supporters) than ever studied anything in your school years, and that's because of your hatred.

Your hatred, can't you see how far your hatred has pushed you over these years to this board? It is so deep, you have dug yourselves so deep into hatred that I can't fathom what would happen if Essendon is found not guilty.

You all say kool aid this, kool aid that but if someone was reading a story/novel about this years later and they had to describe the Essendon supporters I think they would say "they were supportive and defensive of their club".

Stop trying to convince me you and footy world will label us "whatever" for years to come unless we do what you tell us to, I aint drinking that kool-aid.
Your club is not a good citizen. Bombers gonna wither on the vine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Similar threads

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top