Podcast Joe Rogan Experience

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

Even scientists can be grifters.

Thats why they can often be bought by the highest bidder or the view that they know will gain them the most funding.

Of course there are grifters among the climate science fraternity too.

Lol yeah ok, you don't like facts and the truth so you pull out that ridiculous argument that science is corrupt.
Don't live in the modern world if you think science is corrupt and don't ever get on a plane or take medicine.

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

You're not an expert on climate science. Have you spoken about climate change ever?

Yes about accepted facts from years of dedicated research which is different from moronic falsehoods from a drug addicted pr0n addict who can't tell the difference between daily weather predictions and climate modelling.
You should just admit that he was talking crap and that he embarrassed himself, why defend something you already know is wrong?

 

[Bostonian]

Lol yeah ok, you don't like facts and the truth so you pull out that ridiculous argument that science is corrupt.
Don't live in the modern world if you think science is corrupt and don't ever get on a plane or take medicine.

Why can't science have corruption within it?

Every other facet of life does so why would it be immune to it?

What a non-sensical ramble.

So you're saying scientists aren't corruptible then?

That would mean all the scientists that tobacco, oil, mining industries had on their books were telling the truth all along then.

Imagine that!

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

Why can't science have corruption within it?

Every other facet of life does so why would it be immune to it?

What a non-sensical ramble.

So you're saying scientists aren't corruptible then?

That would mean all the scientists that tobacco, oil, mining industries had on their books were telling the truth all along then.

Imagine that!

You're espousing that in general science can't be trusted which is a dullard trump argument.
Do you believe the scientific consensus on global warming or do you believe a youtube celebrity with no climate science background?

 

[Bostonian]

Yes about accepted facts from years of dedicated research which is different from moronic falsehoods from a drug addicted pr0n addict who can't tell the difference between daily weather predictions and climate modelling.
You should just admit that he was talking crap and that he embarrassed himself, why defend something you already know is wrong?

I couldn't give a **** what he was talking about. I didn't watch it. No real interest to me.

Neither did you but you're so triggered by him you're losing your tiny mind over a podcast.

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

I couldn't give a fu** what he was talking about. I didn't watch it. No real interest to me.

Neither did you but you're so triggered by him you're losing your tiny mind over a podcast.

No not losing my mind, just angry that this Peterson jerk is an unaccountable liar that sucks in dumb guys who give him money.

 

[Coolangatta]

Yeah experts can be wrong and corrupt (ahem like Peterson) but they’re often exposed and discredited by other experts within the community (like Dr. Malone who is considered a kook). Also the global scientific community is large, you’d have to be a total whack job to think that institutions from around the world who’ve never interacted with each other are conspiring to screw the little guy over in some way.

 

[Bostonian]

You're espousing that in general science can't be trusted which is a dullard trump argument.
Do you believe the scientific consensus on global warming or do you believe a youtube celebrity with no climate science background?

I said science can be corrupted.

Which of course is a fact.

I don't care about global warming, which is why I'd not listen to a scientist or JP over the subject.

What a waste of time that would be.

 

[Bostonian]

No not losing my mind, just angry that this Peterson jerk is an unaccountable liar that sucks in dumb guys who give him money.

Lying doesn't really bother you that much though really because you'll accept it from some people and lose it over others.

If you have ever voted for a political party then you have no issue with unaccountable liars.

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

Lying doesn't really bother you that much though really because you'll accept it from some people and lose it over others.

If you have ever voted for a political party then you have no issue with unaccountable liars.

That's a poor argument, I don't tolerate any lies.

 

[Bostonian]

Yeah experts can be wrong and corrupt (ahem like Peterson) but they’re often exposed and discredited by other experts within the community (like Dr. Malone who is considered a kook). Also the global scientific community is large, you’d have to be a total whack job to think that institutions from around the world who’ve never interacted with each other are conspiring to screw the little guy over in some way.

There's been plenty of price gouging when it comes to "environmentally friendly" products.

Just pay the right scientist to put their name to something and you can charge the little guy a bucket load more!

And I know this from experience working in marketing for 20 years.

 

[Bostonian]

That's a poor argument, I don't tolerate any lies.

So you don't vote for anyone then.

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

There's been plenty of price gouging when it comes to "environmentally friendly" products.

Just pay the right scientist to put their name to something and you can charge the little guy a bucket load more!

And I know this from experience working in marketing for 20 years.

I think that attacking science to defend Peterson's moronic comments is a bit silly.
You just need to admit that he was talking crap and move on.
He should stick to telling young men to keep their shoulders straight .

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

So you don't vote for anyone then.

Greens mate. Any lies coming from the Greens at all? We tell the truth.
You should have believed them on climate science 20 years ago instead of eating the coal lobby's bs, now look where we are.

 

[Bostonian]

Greens mate. Any lies coming from the Greens at all? We tell the truth.
You should have believed them on climate science 20 years ago instead of eating the coal lobby's bs, now look where we are.

You're so deluded.

The Greens are made up of just the same backstabbing, lying, power hungry hypocrites that every other party is.

You only have to look at their infighting to confirm that.

You vote for a shower of shit party. How funny.

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

You're so deluded.

The Greens are made up of just the same backstabbing, lying, power hungry hypocrites that every other party is.

You only have to look at their infighting to confirm that.

You vote for a shower of sh*t party. How funny.

Ok Rupert Murdoch, whatever you say.
Got any evidence at all for lies told by the Greens?
If there was any, Rupert would do a 5 page spread, meanwhile scummo tells multiple lies everytime he opens his mouth.

 

[Bostonian]

Ok Rupert Murdoch, whatever you say.
Got any evidence at all for lies told by the Greens?
If there was any, Rupert would do a 5 page spread, meanwhile scummo tells multiple lies everytime he opens his mouth.

Remember that time Lydia Thorpe lied and indicated that the NT Attorney General was a white male to pump up her race baiting credentials only for it to turn into the biggest laugh fest when the Attorney General turned out to be an Aboriginal woman.

What an arse clown!

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

Remember that time Lydia Thorpe lied and indicated that the NT Attorney General was a white male to pump up her race baiting credentials only for it to turn into the biggest laugh fest when the Attorney General turned out to be an Aboriginal woman.

What an arse clown!

Wow you found one mistake in 30 years of a party!
Not a lie, just a mistake.
Any lies at all in 30 years?
Just call them rainbow flag waving commies if you can't find any.

 

[Bostonian]

Wow you found one mistake in 30 years of a party!
Not a lie, just a mistake.
Any lies at all in 30 years?
Just call them rainbow flag waving commies if you can't find any.

Race baiting. Actually worse than a simple lie.

Deliberately done.

Only shit campaigners race bait.

If it was a mistake then that says a lot about what a shit nasty racist politician they are

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

Race baiting. Actually worse than a simple lie.

Deliberately done.

Only sh*t campaigners race bait.

If it was a mistake then that says a lot about what a sh*t nasty racist politician they are

Any examples of race baiting? No because you're making it up.

 

[Bostonian]

Any examples of race baiting? No because you're making it up.

I just gave you an embarrassing example of greens race baiting.

“I do hope the Attorney-General, given he probably didn’t read the royal commission recommendations, hopefully he listens to these experts…”



“Hopefully, they’re white. You know, white is right in this place…

That's race baiting champ.

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

I just gave you an embarrassing example of greens race baiting.



That's race baiting champ.

You're clutching at straws now mate.

 

[Bostonian]

You're clutching at straws now mate.

Nah, we're seeing exactly the kind of hypocrisy that comes with sheepish ideologues when their shitty people are called out.

 

[Aristotle Pickett the3rd]

Nah, we're seeing exactly the kind of hypocrisy that comes with sheepish ideologues when their shitty people are called out.

You have no evidence at all for your rambling stereotypes.

 

[Bostonian]

You have no evidence at all for your rambling stereotypes.

I just gave you a prime example of a nasty racist race baiter.

You just ignore it because you're a Greens sheep. Just like the Liberal sheep and the Labor sheep.