Remove this Banner Ad

Player Watch Jordon Sweet

  • Thread starter Thread starter RossFC
  • Start date Start date
  • Tagged users Tagged users None

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

That's assuming we would have developed Jordon.. big assumption
If we'd drafted him we'd be delisting him by now and trading a second rounder for dominant VFL ruckman Sam Hayes.
 
Pretty sure Ladhams destroyed this guy in one of his first games for us. Long time ago, maybe he has developed into a solid option.
Ladhams in his 20th AFL game had the better of 3rd gamer Sweet. What a surprise.
 
Would anyone under 30 know who Gary Sweet is?

No

tid4959-police-rescue-series-1-001-hero.jpg
 

Log in to remove this Banner Ad

a) his coach is notorious for not rating ruckmen
Ah well good thing he's coming to Port then, that'll clear that problem right up
 
Hitouts last 10 games VFL: 53, 49, 43, 25, 50, 42, 52, 55, 43, 44

Interesting some of the lower hitout games were against quality opposition. He basically drew even in combo with Lobb, against Hickey and Ladhams.

In another game he was beaten 30ish to 20ish by Kieran Briggs and similar beating by Ned Moyle for GC.

I guess on paper he certainly looks like a competitive and ready for AFL ruck.

My question for Dogs supporters would be, does he take contested marks? We need a ruck that takes, or at least can compete in marking situations. Our inability to take marks around the ground is a real weakness of ours. His ruck craft is important, as is his ability to get involved at ground level, but obviously from a VFL ruck you can't expect too much, main thing I'm hoping is he can mark a bit.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Without googling it who the * is gary sweet
Gary Sweet Played for the Glenelg reserves in SANFL in 1977-79 before moving to Melbourne in 1980. He kicked a goal at Adelaide Football Park as a dashing wingman with Glenelg in the 1979 reserves Grand Final.
 

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Hayes and Teakle almost certainly gone. I dont reckon anyone would be offering more for Lycett than the current "low ball'/generous offer from Port. Probably stays
If we are offering minimum salary for Lycett, someone else could easily double that for him to be their state league ruck.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

🥰 Love BigFooty? Join now for free.

Back
Top Bottom