So because I think you have a shit list, you automatically think it's based on the medias portrayal of you?
Enlighten me.
On iPhone using BigFooty.com mobile app
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
So because I think you have a shit list, you automatically think it's based on the medias portrayal of you?
I think "eventually" is understating it. How many very good players would be eligible for nomination through these indigenous and multicultural academies in the 20 years prior to their introduction? Now compare it to the brief list for the NSW zones that get people up in arms these days about them "always being AFL heartland". It's good to see them introduced but it's also pandering and potentially overcompensation.
They have what? This isnt soccer mate. Need to spend 95% of salary cap to do that some players get overpaid
Just because those players have left doesn't mean you have all that cash. You still need to spend 95% of the cap so you would've bumped up other players contracts.Crunch the figures yourself.
Boomer, Dal Santo, Petrie, Firrito, Wells & Black were let go last year. The lowest paid would've been Firrito. Black was on $400-420k. Add to that the likelihood of Swallow & Thomas being let go at the end of the year.
North have some serious cash to throw around.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Just because those players have left doesn't mean you have all that cash. You still need to spend 95% of the cap so you would've bumped up other players contracts.
Another poster said you had up to 3 million spare to throw at players, which is idiotic.
There's no argument here. If you believe you have 3 million dollars spare then so be it. I just find it mathematically impossible.Idiotic would be getting into an argument with you over hypotheticals.
Idiotic would be overpaying average players.
Players contract structure can be changed to accommodate reaching the threshold.
I know. Their short-sighted decision making has lead to a Victorian dominated competition over the last decade. It's good to see a supporter of a club receiving some of this largess pointing out the hypocrisy.And the AFL will have to continually change the rules in their never-ending search to fix their initial mistake and try to make the competition fair, or at least not quite so one sided
I know. Their short-sighted decision making has lead to a Victorian dominated competition over the last decade. It's good to see a supporter of a club receiving some of this largess pointing out the hypocrisy.![]()
There has been a non Victorian side in the Grand Final every year since 2011...I know. Their short-sighted decision making has lead to a Victorian dominated competition over the last decade. It's good to see a supporter of a club receiving some of this largess pointing out the hypocrisy.![]()
There has been a non Victorian side in the Grand Final every year since 2011...
It's hardly the AFL's that Sydney couldn't perform on the day. Last year saw a non Vic team on top, two in the top 4 and 4 in the top 8... How is that domination when there are more Victorian sides in the comp?
A few others? Steele is the only one i miss. Loved his work.
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
What do the AFL need to do to stop Sydney choking on the big stage? Or GWS choking in a Prelim?How is Geelong, Hawthorn, Geelong, Collingwood, Geelong, Sydney, Hawthorn, Hawthorn, Hawthorn, Bulldogs not?
When it went Lions x3, Port, Sydney, West Coast the AFL commissioned an inquiry into what needed to be done to help Victorian football. That's 6 from 6. When it's 10 from 11 the other way I get told it's not a domination. Good news for you is that the AFL seems to agree with you, not me.
We made a decision to let Teloar go as he wouldn't sign for the money Shiel and Cogs did in 2015 for 2 years on their initial contracts. It was the right call.
So why was the AFL conducting its previous inquiry after the failure of Essendon, Collingwood and Collingwood? That's 50% of the previous run. I count 40% all Victorian finals in the current run. Not exactly a magnitude of difference.What do the AFL need to do to stop Sydney choking on the big stage? Or GWS choking in a Prelim?
There are plenty of interstate sides playing in finals and one in every GF for the last 5 years. The AFL can't hold their hands on Grand Final day.
So why was the AFL conducting its previous inquiry after the failure of Essendon, Collingwood and Collingwood? That's 50% of the previous run. I count 40% all Victorian finals in the current run. Not exactly a magnitude of difference.
I like how premierships are what counts in everything else but now second and even not making the GF counts just the same. Heh.
It's exactly what happened. The club announced they were offerred similar contracts. Challenging you're comprehension perhaps.You are committing credibility hari kari with your own logic.
I have no idea. I don't remember ever saying they should have had an inquiry either? A Just stating it's hardly a Victorian dominance when we've had an interstate team in the grand final every year and just haven't shown up on the day.So why was the AFL conducting its previous inquiry after the failure of Essendon, Collingwood and Collingwood?
It's exactly what happened. The club announced they were offerred similar contracts. Challenging you're comprehension perhaps.
I rekon he will.don't reckon he'll sign a gws contract extension
Reckon?
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk