Society/Culture Kyle Rittenhouse

[Scallop Industry Thug]

what was preemptive about it? They were literally attacking him and trying to kill him

Lol.

 

[sherb]

Evil thrives when good people do nothing. This is what happens when people take your approach:

https://www.google.com.au/amp/s/www...ws-story/25ce99face8c75aa2d44c178d5845814?amp

Again no one was murdered. Two people were killed coz they tried to murder a teenager

Rittenhouse doesn't play vigilante, and none of this terrible situation has occurred.

Stop defending vigilantism. It has no place in a supposed first world country.

But, if you want to play "look over there", I presume you would have supported vigilantes going in to the Jan 6 event and blowing away a few Trump supporters in "self-defence" when things got tricky? I mean, the policing was pretty ordinary that day too.

 

[sherb]

So your anger is with the person trying to do the right thing not the criminals deliberately doing the wrong thing?

No, any anger/criticism is directed at Rittenhouse.

 

[Clubs are trumps]

It wasn't "his community".

And even if it was "his community", it's the police's job to protect it, not wannabe cops like Kyle.

He had no place being there. And, because he was, two people are dead.

You and every other far left person in this thread are trying to hang Rittenhouse on the premise that he shouldn't be there or have a gun. Nevermind that riots for months all over the country had seen small businesses go up in flames thanks to the fascists who feel entitled to destroy shit because of something that happened in the news .

Rittenhouse was fleeing a violent angry mob who would have killed him or bashed him unconscious if he didnt use his firearm in self-defence. Case closed.

Never ceases to amaze me how leftists defend sex offenders and career criminals once they find out said person is "on their side" of the narrative, then claim racism to validate their hatred and completely flawed opinion on an issue. Embarrassing.

 

[sherb]

You and every other far left person in this thread are trying to hang Rittenhouse on the premise that he shouldn't be there or have a gun. Nevermind that riots for months all over the country had seen small businesses go up in flames thanks to the fascists who feel entitled to destroy sh*t because of something that happened in the news .

Rittenhouse was fleeing a violent angry mob who would have killed him or bashed him unconscious if he didnt use his firearm in self-defence. Case closed.

Never ceases to amaze me how leftists defend sex offenders and career criminals once they find out said person is "on their side" of the narrative, then claim racism to validate their hatred and completely flawed opinion on an issue. Embarrassing.

Correct, he shouldn't have been there. He had no place being there.

And he had no right possessing a firearm in that particular state as a 17yo.

Look, this isn't too difficult. If you don't play vigilante, you don't find yourself in a situation (bolded).

And don't make stupid comments like the second bolded statement. That's just not true.

 

[ChappyUK]

You support people taking justice into their own hands?

Particularly pre-emptive justice? I mean, sweet little Kyle knew nothing about his victims when he decided to pump a bullet or two into each of them.

It is exactly why the riot started in the first place.

 

[sherb]

It is exactly why the riot started in the first place.

Doesn't answer the question.

 

[Clubs are trumps]

Correct, he shouldn't have been there. He had no place being there.

And he had no right possessing a firearm in that particular state as a 17yo.

Look, this isn't too difficult. If you don't play vigilante, you don't find yourself in a situation (bolded).

And don't make stupid comments like the second bolded statement. That's just not true.

but he was there. You cant say he didnt use his firearm in self-defense just because you dont agree with him being there.

What you and everyone who wants Rittenhouse to be imprisoned are indirectly saying, is that when he was fleeing and fell to the ground, he should have just lied there and let the angry mob bash him or kill him. Do you realise how despicable your POV is?

As for the "vigilante" comment, you are another sheep following the MSM narrative. He was far from running around and gunning down anyone he saw. He was protecting the innocent people and their property from the violent thugs who were destroying businesses. Far from a vigilante, but whatever validates your desire to see him punished.

 

[sherb]

but he was there. You cant say he didnt use his firearm in self-defense just because you dont agree with him being there.

What you and everyone who wants Rittenhouse to be imprisoned are indirectly saying, is that when he was fleeing and fell to the ground, he should have just lied there and let the angry mob bash him or kill him. Do you realise how despicable your POV is?

As for the "vigilante" comment, you are another sheep following the MSM narrative. He was far from running around and gunning down anyone he saw. He was protecting the innocent people and their property from the violent thugs who were destroying businesses. Far from a vigilante, but whatever validates your desire to see him punished.

You clearly don't understand what a vigilante is.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

What you and everyone who wants Rittenhouse to be imprisoned are indirectly saying, is that when he was fleeing and fell to the ground, he should have just lied there and let the angry mob bash him or kill him. Do you realise how despicable your POV is?

"Angry mob".

He was walking around with a armed militia fall of Proud Boy larpers and assorted halfwits.

 

[ChappyUK]

Doesn't answer the question.

The 'he shouldn't have been there' question has been answered and offers nothing.

Out of this incident below. Who shouldnt have been there in your opinion?

BLM ‘activists’ celebrated as Trump supporter was killed: Devine

It’s spine-chilling to hear activists in Portland cheering about the cold-blooded murder of a Trump supporter Saturday night. “I am not sad that a f–king fascist died tonight,” a woman shouts…

www.google.co.uk

 

[sherb]

The 'he shouldn't have been there' question has been answered and offers nothing.

Out of this incident below. Who shouldnt have been there in your opinion?

BLM ‘activists’ celebrated as Trump supporter was killed: Devine

It’s spine-chilling to hear activists in Portland cheering about the cold-blooded murder of a Trump supporter Saturday night. “I am not sad that a f–king fascist died tonight,” a woman shouts…

www.google.co.uk

How has it been answered? Even you have said he shouldn't have been there.

This is what vigilantism leads to. People like this twit, clearly lacking in any quality needed to be in a situation like that (experience, expertise, maturity, training, etc), getting in way over their heads.

He thought all he had to do was take a gun along and "sweet".

Your response still doesn't answer the question by the way.

 

[Clubs are trumps]

"Angry mob".

He was walking around with a armed militia fall of Proud Boy larpers and assorted halfwits.

dude you are so far gone you need a break from the internet.

What do you think the person who smacked Rittenhouse in the head with a skateboard was his friend, or that the bloke that pulled a gun on him was holding a waterpistol? Where were the "armed militia" when Rittenhouse fell to the ground?

 

[ChappyUK]

Still doesn't answer the question.

The answer to the question is when there is no law and order something will fill the void. Be it vigilantes, looters, anarchists etc. None of it is right.

I've answered your question now address mine.

 

[Balls In]

Judge receiving death threats ahead of the verdict. Sure sign the facts aren't matching the far left narrative.

 

[ChappyUK]

dude you are so far gone you need a break from the internet.

What do you think the person who smacked Rittenhouse in the head with a skateboard was his friend, or that the bloke that pulled a gun on him was holding a waterpistol? Where were the "armed militia" when Rittenhouse fell to the ground?

It was all entirely peaceful before Rittenhouse turned up.

Really obvious most here have not followed the trial and are just here due to groupthink.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

Judge receiving death threats ahead of the verdict. Sure sign the facts aren't matching the far left narrative.

Source?

 

[sherb]

The answer to the question is when there is no law and order something will fill the void. Be it vigilantes, looters, anarchists etc. None of it is right.

I've answered your question now address mine.

So you support vigilantism. Cool.

And you support the extreme outcomes of vigilantism. Cool.

It's all about deflecting from Kyle with you. Cool.

If you take that stance regarding "no law and order", you must have hated what happened on Jan 6 (as I pointed out to another poster). If only we had a few Kyles to go in to that situation and "fill the void", they could have blown away a few anarchists in the name of self-defence at the same time as playing policeman.

 

[ChappyUK]

So you support vigilantism. Cool.

And you support the extreme outcomes of vigilantism. Cool.

It's all about deflecting from Kyle with you. Cool.

If you take that stance regarding "no law and order", you must have hated what happened on Jan 6 (as I pointed out to another poster). If only we had a few Kyles to go in to that situation and "fill the void", they could have blown away a few anarchists in the name of self-defence at the same time as playing policeman.

You didn't bother reading the article. Typical.

You can't have it both ways. You can't be for riots and against vigilantes. It's just a screwed perspective.

Always find its best to judge a person not by what they are outraged by but what they are not.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

Judge receiving death threats ahead of the verdict. Sure sign the facts aren't matching the far left narrative.

So far, Ive found 2 sources for this claim. Fox News and Daily Mail. Not saying they're wrong, but shut the **** up about others trusting MSM narratives when you're using them.

 

[Balls In]

So far, Ive found 2 sources for this claim. Fox News and Daily Mail. Not saying they're wrong, but shut the fu** up about others trusting MSM narratives when you're using them.

Probably the judge lied about receiving the threats. Yes that is what it would be.

 

[sherb]

You didn't bother reading the article. Typical.

You can't have it both ways. You can't be for riots and against vigilantes. It's just a screwed perspective.

Always find its best to judge a person not by what they are outraged by but what they are not.

Not responding about the article doesn't mean I didn't read it.

Think.

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

Probably the judge lied about receiving the threats. Yes that is what it would be.

So what were your sources?

 

[Clubs are trumps]

So you support vigilantism. Cool.

And you support the unjustifiable destruction of property and targeting of innocent business owners.

Who has the lack of morality here?

 

[ChappyUK]

Not responding about the article doesn't mean I didn't read it.

Think.

So you're going with ignorance. Good for you.