Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Happened on the centre square line. Hep was running parallel to it to setup on the other side as an option then went to defend the ball on the rebound.
Playing the game. Like he should be. Not getting caught on a scuffle accomplishing a complete fall down in structure and a fine.
This isnt the 90s there would be no square up. No flying the flag. Those acts arent in our game, and thus he did what he should have. Played his role in the structure.
Players that I would say no matter what would be first in, in this situation.
Hurley
Baggers
BJ
Parish
Zach M
Guelfi
The rest would wait until 2 are already in before joining.
How about a rugby franchise?. We could cross-train and finally learn how to tackle and how to shrug tacklesThink it's pretty clear none of us want an nbl team or an eSports team. We want a mixed martial arts dojo
Hep has made a choice here to continue playing the game for the immediate short-term sake of the team.
But I tend to agree that for the long-term sake of the team a little bit of old-school sticking up for your mates is required as a show of unity to drag your younger teammates along with you. Otherwise the message we are sending is that, as a youngster, you are merely a cog in the developing machine - stick to the structures at all costs. What needs to be shown is that the whole is more than just the sum of its parts. And each component part (player) is as meaningful as the whole. Ultimately that sense of meaning comes when your leaders get in there to protect and defend you because you are that Whole - a signature of the Team.
our guys are weak - we need to get some ice rage happening. i know a guy. ex leader of the club.
PLUR HugsMDMA hugs can nearly be classed as a tackle too
MDMA hugs can nearly be classed as a tackle too
So you’re suggesting I pickup Bomber in SuperCoach?
In responding to Oliver, a Chinese burn would have been in order; for Jones a moonslap (take that baldy!); for the dwarfish Spargo, a wedgie (obviously). It’s only then you can proceed to sconners, dead-arms, dead-legs, fart-and-carries, and groin-flicks...
Do like dev and his attitude.After the supplements saga and Jobe stepping aside to give the side a youthful kick, has Essendon ellected the right man for the job to lead our club forward?
At two weeks shy of 26 years old, Dyson Heppel seems a great guy, a fella you'd love to have a beer and a laugh with, but realistically are we gonna be stuck with him for the next five years to set the trend and for our young players to aspire to be like? There is no one else to fill the position, he's the best of a really, really bad bunch of leaders but surely we can't go on like this.
The capitulation for me was watching on as he walked passed Brendan Goddard, flog or not, fighting three Melbourne players on his own and our boy Dyson just strolled passed within 5 meters without even batting an eye lid.
I want a captain who cracks in hard, physically takes it to the opposition and can at least give some sort of inspiration to the players around him. If Heppel bought just a hint of this to his game Id turn a blind eye to his deplorable disposal.
Dev and Pidge seem the only two that attack the game with enough campaigner in them to set the trend but I don't think either will ever have the physical presence needed. Is it too unrealistic to think we should be looking to trade for a ready made, big bodied bull that can really make it clear to our current pea hearts that playing AFL isn't just an easy paycheck for 10 years of your life?
I'm not even fed up with the club, I'm just realistic at where we are at and the fact is that we are on par with St Kilda and Carlton. A lot needs to change and it's gotta start at the top.
It can work quite well, a la Lloyd restructuring sewells skull and the hawks team losing their minds over it.It wont be a case of "If Hawthorn get physical" it will be "When Hawthorn get physical".
Unfortunately every team in the AFL will target Essendon in a similar fashion now. We have created a dilemma for ourselves and the more times we crumble under physical pressure, the worse things are going to get.
It is "Line in the sand".
probably should be Daniher.Leadership isn't about knocking people's blocks off anyway, do we even have a talisman any more? The guy that takes over when the game is on the line or the opponent is on a run?
Everyone has the guy, the Bont, Danger, Cripps, Pendles, Dusty... They don't even have to wear the C
But it seems all of our leaders are not game changers, they are compilers.
You'll never turn a game in an instant compiling, thats a death of a thousand cuts type of win.
Could also be Stringer!probably should be Daniher.
Has the athleticism and skill and he is tall, mobile and a freak leap.
If he's injured, we need him fit
If he's out of form, we need him back in form.
And we need to sort out the errant shots on goal.
It can work quite well, a la Lloyd restructuring sewells skull and the hawks team losing their minds over it.
One expendable player, runs through Mitchell at the first stoppage, and we take the game from there.
This ties in with whats been in the back of my mind lately. Whether you identify one player or whether you look towards a whole team psychological trigger, something is lacking. There's lots of ways of describing that type of thing. Call it a thirst for the challenge, or call it aggression, or call it a winning mindset. There needs to be something that happens when the going gets really tough. Instead Essendon right now seem to have a mechanism that actually breaks when you apply enough heat. You could almost say the team hasn't found it's psychological mojo.Leadership isn't about knocking people's blocks off anyway, do we even have a talisman any more? The guy that takes over when the game is on the line or the opponent is on a run?
Everyone has the guy, the Bont, Danger, Cripps, Pendles, Dusty... They don't even have to wear the C
But it seems all of our leaders are not game changers, they are compilers.
You'll never turn a game in an instant compiling, thats a death of a thousand cuts type of win.
probably should be Daniher.
Has the athleticism and skill and he is tall, mobile and a freak leap.
If he's injured, we need him fit
If he's out of form, we need him back in form.
And we need to sort out the errant shots on goal.
This ties in with whats been in the back of my mind lately. Whether you identify one player or whether you look towards a whole team psychological trigger, something is lacking. There's lots of ways of describing that type of thing. Call it a thirst for the challenge, or call it aggression, or call it a winning mindset. There needs to be something that happens when the going gets really tough. Instead Essendon right now seem to have a mechanism that actually breaks when you apply enough heat. You could almost say the team hasn't found it's psychological mojo.
We should change captain to BJ and tell everyone that they need to match whatever intensity and aggression that BJ is showing
Well he was Captain in 2016 and I felt we had a lot more aggression and intensity that year with much more kids in the side.This ties in with whats been in the back of my mind lately. Whether you identify one player or whether you look towards a whole team psychological trigger, something is lacking. There's lots of ways of describing that type of thing. Call it a thirst for the challenge, or call it aggression, or call it a winning mindset. There needs to be something that happens when the going gets really tough. Instead Essendon right now seem to have a mechanism that actually breaks when you apply enough heat. You could almost say the team hasn't found it's psychological mojo.
We should change captain to BJ and tell everyone that they need to match whatever intensity and aggression that BJ is showing