- Joined
- Sep 26, 2004
- Posts
- 48,834
- Reaction score
- 66,158
- AFL Club
- Carlton
- Staff
- #401
Wasn't it Blake caracella the one who fixed his kicking. ??
Perhaps, but Ben Perkins is who I was thinking of, as mentioned above. He's also worked with Hawkins.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

PLUS Your club board comp is now up!
BigFooty Tipping Notice Img
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Opening Round
The Golden Ticket - Official AFL on-seller of MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
Wasn't it Blake caracella the one who fixed his kicking. ??
Hawkins credited Caracella for the improvement in his kicking this year when interviewed on "On the Couch" on Monday night @ the AA dinner.Perhaps, but Ben Perkins is who I was thinking of, as mentioned above. He's also worked with Hawkins.
That could also cover Cloke and Dawes really... the average at best tall forward but Cloke doesnt ruck...Definition. The leigh brown position, an average at best tall forward who pinch hits in the ruck and plays off the coat tails of two in form tall forwards.
Bullshit... averaging 1.6 goals per game over his career is an average tall forward. He is an A-grade contested mark. But thats about all he is. 172 games, 283 goals... not exactly the figures of an A-grade KPFJeezus mate, if you think Cloke is an average tall forward, you really need to watch some footy, or take you head out your a**. Im not advocating that we get him, but even blind Freddy can see that he is a an A-Grade KPF.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
Ohh... and both Buddy and Roughy have played less games than Cloke have after being recruited in the same year as Cloke. So Cloke must be so awesome we just have to get him to Carlton because he is so much better than both of those guys...Jeezus mate, if you think Cloke is an average tall forward, you really need to watch some footy, or take you head out your a**. Im not advocating that we get him, but even blind Freddy can see that he is a an A-Grade KPF.

Think Levi is potentially far more of an impact player than Brown was.That could also cover Cloke and Dawes really... the average at best tall forward but Cloke doesnt ruck...
All about stats isn't it mate. Sound a bit like a coach who just recently lost his job actually. Show me a stat for presence, packs crashed, or the number of time opposition defenders have gone for a 2 on 1 vs Cloke, leaving another forward free in a dangerous position. You ask 18 coaches in the AFL who they want as their KPF out of Cloke and Roughead, 18 of them would pick Cloke. He isn't recognised as one of the best KPF's in the game, by the entire industry by mistake mate.
Just stop.That could also cover Cloke and Dawes really... the average at best tall forward but Cloke doesnt ruck...


Don't let goal av determine who is an A grade CHF. He might not be better than some you mention but he is A grade - A grade does not mean Hall of Famer but you may be interested in knowing that Cloke's av is the same as our Team of the Century player Robert WallsBullshit... averaging 1.6 goals per game over his career is an average tall forward. He is an A-grade contested mark. But thats about all he is. 172 games, 283 goals... not exactly the figures of an A-grade KPF
An A-grade KPF is someone who averages 3 goals per game over his career...
Fev managed it... Buddy is currently on 3.2 goals/game
Buddy wins matches off his own boot... Cloke doesnt. I would pay 1 mill a season for Buddy... Cloke is worth about half of that really.
So... how about you pull your head out of your arse and watch some football and do some research before opening your mouth in future. Then you wont get embarrassed when talking about 'A-grade' KPF.
PS: Jarryd Roughead's figures as a CHF playing in the same team as Buddy... 1.9 goals/game. I would even take Roughy for the money we are supposedly offering Cloke.
Wayne Carey, 272 games, 727 goals (2.67 goals/game)Bullshit... averaging 1.6 goals per game over his career is an average tall forward. He is an A-grade contested mark. But thats about all he is. 172 games, 283 goals... not exactly the figures of an A-grade KPF
An A-grade KPF is someone who averages 3 goals per game over his career...
Fev managed it... Buddy is currently on 3.2 goals/game
This is true. In fact, I think from memory only one player in Carlton's Team of the Century averages more than 3 goals per game, and that is Harry Vallence. Sticks wasn't quite there from memory (2.97).Don't let goal av determine who is an A grade CHF. He might not be better than some you mention but he is A grade - A grade does not mean Hall of Famer but you may be interested in knowing that Cloke's av is the same as our Team of the Century player Robert Walls
Of course it is bloody true - that is why I stated itWayne Carey, 272 games, 727 goals (2.67 goals/game)
I think your sentiments are mostly right Dram, but remember, not all KPF play in the same positions. Buddy and Fev were both true FF.
Cloke's bonus is more what he offers in terms of marking and creating goals for other players.
This is true. In fact, I think from memory only one player in Carlton's Team of the Century averages more than 3 goals per game, and that is Harry Vallence. Sticks wasn't quite there from memory (2.97).
These figures though were figures I worked out about a decade ago, I could be very hazy on the details.

Of course it is bloody true - that is why I stated it![]()


Where is the Q love in this postCloke is a true CHF - not a FF - his value is his ability to take get out of goal marks turn and delvier a 60 meter fast kick to Waite/Casboult who then mark or put ball to eddie or walker or jeff to goal. Oh - Cloke can also kick a 60 meter goal - regularly. A lot of misunderstanding about Cloke's true value. We do not have a big HF crashing mark taking big kicker in the side of Clokes quality - the only team who has is Collingwood and Hawthorn.

Cloke is a true CHF - not a FF - his value is his ability to take get out of goal marks turn and delvier a 60 meter fast kick to Waite/Casboult who then mark or put ball to eddie or walker or jeff to goal. Oh - Cloke can also kick a 60 meter goal - regularly. A lot of misunderstanding about Cloke's true value. We do not have a big HF crashing mark taking big kicker in the side of Clokes quality - the only team who has is Collingwood and Hawthorn.
I seem to recall Hammer slamming one from outside 50 against GWS on the run.
Cloke is a true CHF - not a FF - his value is his ability to take get out of goal marks turn and delvier a 60 meter fast kick to Waite/Casboult who then mark or put ball to eddie or walker or jeff to goal. Oh - Cloke can also kick a 60 meter goal - regularly. A lot of misunderstanding about Cloke's true value. We do not have a big HF crashing mark taking big kicker in the side of Clokes quality - the only team who has is Collingwood and Hawthorn.

we do have a pack crasher up forward... it's the guy who this thread is about.We do but he is at the wrong end, maybe not such a pack crasher though... Watson to CHF then it is![]()
we do have a pack crasher up forward... it's the guy who this thread is about.
Remember that he crashed a couple of packs and left a couple of bodies in his wake in the game against the dogs. He has also got the physical strength to ragdoll a second or third defender in a one on one situation.
Just sayin... we should keep him and put him in the square.
I agree completely. I am a Blues fan first and foremost, and because of that I will support anyone who pulls on a Navy Blue jumper. However, while Cloke is a gun, I'm not really into the idea of signing him and/or Lynch. When it comes to big forwards, we have Casboult, Mitchell and whichever of Hampson/Kreuzer isn't in the ruck. All of those guys are still quite young and should only get better, whilst also being cheaper than Cloke by a long way. I think it really does come down to what sort of future each person wants -- to sign Cloke and go all out to win a premiership in the next couple of years, or to add other lesser-rated pieces and let our youth develop and potentially be a contender for the next 5 to 10 years. Personally, I'm in the second group.