Strapping Young Lad
Moderator
- Apr 19, 2006
- 105,835
- 276,778
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Storm, Spurs, Socceroos
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
The site is having some issues with pics at the moment.Dunno if it's my browser or the .png file type but I get a broken image on you posting it there, also when I tried previewing/posting it.
The site is having some issues with pics at the moment.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
if that's all you have, your research hasn't been very thorough.
i was holding out hope you might have something interesting and informative to share. you lost me completely though after your post claiming a betting conspiracy (worthy of a royal commission apparently) involving the ALP because matty primus and a labor man who happens to be a bulldogs board member made small bets on geelong games while *gasp* bomber thompson was coach.
there's far more recent and comprehensive information on the efficacy and anabolic effects of AOD-9604 - including all the results of dank's trials on 'professional footballers' - in publicly available documents on the web.
but since you aren't exactly forthcoming with all of your supposed intel, i think i'll do likewise and leave you to find it yourself. or maybe i'll drip-feed some oblique hints over the next few days![]()
If you ignore Labor implications, you've got to admit just on an AFL level - it's explosive stuff!
And whether its even true or not, it's certainly juicy enough for me to want to hear more and find out how much goss/fact/slander that CozzaD has to offer!
Now look at the calzada paper released in April last year (years after the research completed) that goes to great lengths to state that AOD doesn't raise the levels of IGF after all. Thus making it a non-PED. Look at the timing of said paper and what else was happening at the same time.I'm happy for you to believe what you want mate.
The problem with a lot of this stuff is its not about guilt or innocence its about you can prove. And at the moment I see sweet f all.
It's easy to make up a story and link articles together.
Hay I might start one now.
Russia's movement of warships is really headed the protect the great barrier against coal mining.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/na...ing-to-australia/story-fni0xqrb-1227120928528
The Russians see coal as a negative impact on their gas exports to Europe.
http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=13151
rita has it this weekdid laugh
doesn't even need transcribing for Herald-Sun readers.
send it poste haste to Robbo....or Titus.....whoever is their chief footy writer these days.
20 bucks betting aint match fixing. You wanna see Mick Gattos m8's laying about 100k minimum. And a few on offshore SP and Betfair, gotta be a million atleast to pay off those involved.the only 'end game' you have implied is a grand conspiracy involving the ALP and corruption of all forms in the AFL.
perhaps you'd like to explain this post in more detail:
the 'connections' you have discovered here are so laughably pathetic that they aren't even worth refuting.
good luck with that royal commission.
Now look at the calzada paper released in April last year (years after the research completed) that goes to great lengths to state that AOD doesn't raise the levels of IGF after all. Thus making it a non-PED. Look at the timing of said paper and what else was happening at the same time.
the reason for this guy being on BF and posting this stuff really only has one possible motivation ... and I don't think he will be able to skirt around it much longer.
Just wiped a bunch of stuff that we thought went over the top.
If CozzaD has info on corruption he should talk to a journalist.
As a Christian I find that (sky fairy) very offensive and not necessary to the conversation.Aren't generalisations fun?
I'm probably the most vocal Hawthorn poster here, and I'm a militant Atheist who has absolutely no care for which sky fairy you or anyone else wants to believe in.
I didn't read every post.
Your not doing a social experiment are you?As a Christian I find that (sky fairy) very offensive and not necessary to the conversation.
Since all these explosive revelations are coming to light, here's a copy of the consent forms!
http://i.imgur.com/CwK7cQn.png
As a Christian I find that (sky fairy) very offensive and not necessary to the conversation.
As a Christian I find that (sky fairy) very offensive and not necessary to the conversation.
I'm not going to make any further comment. Let's respectfully move on shall we.How about flying spaghetti monster?
Why comment at all?I'm not going to make any further comment. Let's respectfully move on shall we.