Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
Yawn, arse scab has turned up again.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
IF naicos did get 5 from McRae, the real story is how did Serong get more than Naicos from Longmuir given he had 6 fewer possessions and went at 45% disposal efficiency whereas Naicos went at 70%,
hmmm
Let's look up the total SI stats so far in 2025 shall we.
View attachment 2374171
Would you look at that, 2 SI's behind the leader at 22 years old. Leading much older and established players too.
![]()

Love the multi paragraph stat lookup melts. Baited every single time.Bulldogs alone have two mids with more score involvements per game than Daycare. And they both have much higher defensive numbers, tackles, pressure acts, defensive half pressure acts, spoils(Daycare has not made a single spoil this year.) And they both get given the ball by team-mates less often than Daycare:
Bontempelli 13 x receives per game, 8.5 score involvements, 5.8 tackles, 21 pressure acts, 8 defensive pressure acts and 1 spoil per game.
Richards 14 receives per game, 8.2 score involvements, 3.9 tackles, 21 pressure acts, 9.2 defensive pressure acts, 0.3 spoils per game.
Nick Giveittomecos 17 receives per game, 8.1 score involvements, 3.8 tackles, 14 pressure acts, 6.2 defensive pressure acts, zero spoils for the season.
And we are supposed to believe this entitled git is the best player in the game.![]()
Love the multi paragraph stat lookup melts. Baited every single time.
I find it appauling how you compare young anicholas with players in their 8th and 12th years though.![]()
He was born in January 2003. A few weeks....The scare weird little entitled campaigner will be 23 in a few weeks.

He was born in January 2003. A few weeks....![]()
You really seethingly despise Nick to the core of your being don't you?Quality melt about your idol basically already being in his prime and McRae having to cheat vote to make him look like he is something more than a chip scab that Freo didn't even bother picking up.
You really seethingly despise Nick to the core of your being don't you?
His prime is probably 4 years away m7. Enjoy the show!


Mobility scooter technology would need to have come a long way.Put it this way, if I played against him in 1980's footy and ever caught the little germ I would definitely be trying to think of ways to hurt him. Nothing would give me greater pleasure than to totally shitmix him.
My chances of ever catching him probably not overly strong though.![]()
umpires pet and seagull42 and 3.1
20 coaches votes minimum Meteoric Rise.
42 and 3.1
20 coaches votes minimum Meteoric Rise.
42 and 3.1
20 coaches votes minimum Meteoric Rise.


Cope harder Ruseman.33 uncontested chipscab disposals. Plays for votes not for his team.
Tigers just let him run around doing what he wanted and said thank you very much, we'll back ourselves at the line and clean house. Imagine you let an actual gun run around unmanned, no way you win the line.
Daycare, lay a tackle you weak selfish campaigner.![]()

Cope harder Ruseman.
"Noooo it's not a real disposal if you don't get them at the bottom of a pack."
![]()

Wang just showed arch chip-scab Nick Daycare what a real footballer looks like. You need to be able to get it done ahead of the ball, not running around with no opponent with 17 team-mates instructed to give it to you even if you are in a worse position than them.
Wang doesn't play = Saints don't win. 10 coaches votes that actually matter.
Daycare doesn't play = no difference to scoreboard. 10 pointless coaches votes.
It would be nice for you if Daycare wasn't a totally pointless footballer, but you will get over it Chronz.![]()