- Joined
- Mar 25, 2003
- Posts
- 35,681
- Reaction score
- 28,351
i can't believe you guys. surely the fancy polygon shaped letters on the menu can justify these sort of prices?
even putting aside their ridiculous sharing policy, surely two people sharing a meal should only constitute a $6.50 rise, rather than $13.00. I would have thought the initial meal cost is absorbed by the first person involved in the eating, and only additional people would be considered sharers?
As for the sharing policy who polices that? What if one person just sits down with them but doesn't eat at all. What if they take one or two bites just to taste? **** i'd hate to work at that place. All you wanna do is earn you're (often less than) $20 an hour with a minimal of fuss, and you've got to enforce some stupid policy that you probably completely hate.
As said in this thread you can see the reasons, but the execution is very lacking.
even putting aside their ridiculous sharing policy, surely two people sharing a meal should only constitute a $6.50 rise, rather than $13.00. I would have thought the initial meal cost is absorbed by the first person involved in the eating, and only additional people would be considered sharers?
As for the sharing policy who polices that? What if one person just sits down with them but doesn't eat at all. What if they take one or two bites just to taste? **** i'd hate to work at that place. All you wanna do is earn you're (often less than) $20 an hour with a minimal of fuss, and you've got to enforce some stupid policy that you probably completely hate.
As said in this thread you can see the reasons, but the execution is very lacking.








