If I have my way, Mundy ain’t going anywhere for at least another year.
300 here we come.
Mundy could easily do 2 more. Myabe even 3...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

Due to a number of factors, support for the current BigFooty mobile app has been discontinued. Your BigFooty login will no longer work on the Tapatalk or the BigFooty App - which is based on Tapatalk.
Apologies for any inconvenience. We will try to find a replacement.
If I have my way, Mundy ain’t going anywhere for at least another year.
300 here we come.
Did anyone else hear Ross say Mick just needs a good summer and he'll be able to play out 4 quarters no problem? Clearly getting a contract extension. And deservedly so.
It is a nice luxury to have, but I still see McCarthy as our best 3rd tall.
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
I reckon you would have Taberner's babies if you could. At least marry him.When Taberner comes back, McCarthy will be competing with Cox for that third tall role.
Matera Cox Walters
Apeness Taberner Mundy/resting mid
That's how our forward line would line up if everyone was fit (not counting Bennell)
Taberner IMO is still our #1 pure key forward. All 3 are good contested marks, but he's better at leading and kicking for goal than the other 2. Apeness is a great fit for Ruck/Forward. So Cox vs McCarthy for that 3rd tall spot is going to be tough decision.
Perhaps I am overstating it as a lock, and I agree Apeness will have to earn his spot as a forward. But I think two of Apeness, Taberner and Cox is acceptable, three is too heavy. If he maintains his fitness Apeness is one of the two for me, because of his ruck ability.A lock? Wow. Apeness has exceeded expectations but is not even close to a lock imo. He is the worst forward of those three but clearly the best ruck. Given it is about an 80/20% fwd/ruck arrangement I prefer a good forward that is an ok ruck as opposed to a good ruck who is an ok forward.
Perhaps I am overstating it as a lock, and I agree Apeness will have to earn his spot as a forward. But I think two of Apeness, Taberner and Cox is acceptable, three is too heavy. If he maintains his fitness Apeness is one of the two for me, because of his ruck ability.
McCarthy isn't really competing with Cox imo. He needs to be more about mobility, whereas Cox is about marking power. Cox OR Apeness.
Remember Cox is / was a defender in his younger years, so why pigeon hole him forward. We haven’t had the luxury of a swingman in years
I really think we will see Ross change up the forward line mix as the year goes especially as tabs comes back, Dixon to maybe get a game or two and Bennell(?) to maybe play a few.
All of a sudden, what and who do we trade/draft for next year if this potential starts to perform
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Cox played forward in his younger days.
Taberner and Cox are outstanding marks, and Apeness very good. I think that set up is overkill, and we would benefit by more speed and skill surrounding two of them. In my mind that potentially includes McCarthy and Mundy.I think we can play all three or four - Tabs, Cox and McCarthy have the ability to push up to the wing with their mobility, take some marks and be the link up player, while Ape can stay forward/ruck. McCarthy is arguably the best kick inside 50, and is more mobile than the other talls. And Tabs and Ape contributing in the ruck will keep Sandi fresh.
This is what I would like to see:
- Ape playing mostly FF while relieving Sandi in the ruck
- Tabs playing CHF, pushing down to the wing, and playing a little time in the ruck to rest Sandi/Ape
- Cox playing CHF/HFF, pushing into the wing, moving into HB or back of the square to provide intercept assistance if needed
- McCarthy playing mostly wing and HFF to deliver inside 50 and snag a couple of goals of his own, at his best he plays as a tall medium forward IMO
Tabs/Cox pushing to the wing means we can contest if our backs have no other option than to bomb it long, and I would argue that they are both a more reliable mark than Sandi (not to put the big man down, he can clunk them)
West Coast have worked with 3-4 talls for most of the season.Taberner and Cox are outstanding marks, and Apeness very good. I think that set up is overkill, and we would benefit by more speed and skill surrounding two of them. In my mind that potentially includes McCarthy and Mundy.
Cox may be able to play back but I think we have the cast down there to do well, and I am especially liking the speed of the players in our defence.
Tabs also covers a lot of ground and does some decent work as the outlet target. He's become reliable which we need
waterman is listed at 191cm. Lycett averages .4 goals a game.West Coast have worked with 3-4 talls for most of the season.
Kennedy - Tabs
Lycett - Apeness
Darling - Cox
+ Waterman who is 6'3
Obviously ours boys have a way to go to match their output but the last two weeks have shown we are definitely seeing an improved connection between our midfield and fwdline when we have multiple players able to take a contested grab in the forward line and down the wings for the outlet kick.
It was a long time ago but one of Apeness' draft highlights was his endurance running. Get a full preseason into him and the Tabs/Apeness/Cox combo will be a fairly mobile fwdline. Just need to make sure the smalls are crumbing and pressuring rather than trying to take a mark mark with the big boys.
Just watched the replay. Apeness did some really nice things. He's big and strong with good hands and he can actually football a bit.
I thought he was finished. Very happy to be wrong.
Based on what?
He was the ruck/forward that we needed at the time and was considered the best shot on goal of his draft year. He has been really unlucky with uncommon injuries but seems to be getting game time at Peel now.
He could be the answer in a few weeks to the KPF that we are crying out for.
waterman is listed at 191cm. Lycett averages .4 goals a game.