pretty sure Cameron re-signed with GWS, we had our crack, now it is time to move onAre you just taking the piss or do you possess an unfortunately low IQ?

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.

LIVE: Geelong v Gold Coast - Rd 14 - 7:40PM Fri
Squiggle tips Cats at 78% chance -- What's your tip? -- Injury Lists » -- All Rd 14 Games
pretty sure Cameron re-signed with GWS, we had our crack, now it is time to move onAre you just taking the piss or do you possess an unfortunately low IQ?

Man that sounds like an awesome trip, on second thought screw all these guys who get paid a packet to kick a footyCEY's training with Hugh Greenwood in the US where Greenwood played college ball. Hopefully they both come into pre-season in tip top shape.

West AdelaideBut he played 2 years of reasonably good footy at North, didn't he ?Norf didn't think so !!
Log in to remove this Banner Ad
West AdelaideBet you never waited till Christmas morning for your presents did you?How long do we have for all this to be sorted out? Geez it is dragged out - which is of course exactly how the AFL like it!
I just want my shiny new toys now!!
West AdelaideThat's a pretty fair assessment .......hopefully the one year contract is that stimuli to get his backside into gear and go to another levelThis may ruffle some feathers but I simply cannot for the life of me see what all the fuss is about concerning Harrison Wigg. When I have watched him in games on TV admittingly, he has failed to impress me. Sure he has a nice kick but he doesn't get enough of it. He is small, not particularly quick and gets brushed aside way too easy for mine. I rate him the same as Menzel, they both have the rep but underperform in my view. I'm not saying he won't make it but he has a few in front of him.
Very few players show significant improvement after being on the list for 5 years. Those I have got wrong showed rapid & massive improvement fairly quickly after I made those wrong calls - Cameron & Laird are both examples of players I underestimated. I'm struggling to think of a player who has been around for as long as CEY, playing as few games as CEY, who has ever gone on to be more than a fringe player.
I think there are several issues with CEY's game - his kicking is more random than a roulette wheel, his defensive pressure is lacking, he lacks the attitude/aggression to make it, and his training work ethic is (reportedly) questionable. His hand skills are fine, and he does get a reasonable amount of the ball, particularly at SANFL level. However, his game does have some serious flaws - which is why he has rarely been selected (aside from the Walsh era).
Oh god imagine if the AFL was in charge of the Christmas schedule. It'd take months.Bet you never waited till Christmas morning for your presents did you?
Well guess what, Lyons got a chance this year and he took it, He was good enough and did play. he was one of 6 plus players that did.You're reminding me of all those people who said the same for Lyons; "if he's good enough he'll play". In the end he proved he was good enough but he didn't play until the sub rule was gone and guys like Wright were moved on. That kind of thinking is just shallow and naive, and is underpinned by a need to trust the coaches.
Lyons proved that he was good enough to be a fringe player, just like Wright & co before him. He didn't prove that we'd been leaving a gun player in the sheds.. just that he was capable of stepping up to the plate when we needed to replace one fringe player with another.Well guess what, Lyons got a chance this year and he took it, He was good enough and did play. he was one of 6 plus players that did.
Losing taps? I thought our rucks were really solid in that team. I must have been watching a different bloke to you. We are talking about #35 aren't we?
Not talking about how good he, Lyons was, I was referring to player taking there opportunity and playing AFL football. Lyons was one of 6-7 players to do that in 2016 for the CrowsLyons proved that he was good enough to be a fringe player, just like Wright & co before him. He didn't prove that we'd been leaving a gun player in the sheds.. just that he was capable of stepping up to the plate when we needed to replace one fringe player with another.
Let's face it, there are good reasons why Adelaide were happy to trade him (and actively encouraged it), receiving fairly limited picks in return (#43 & #67). If they thought he was a gun player, not just a fringe dwellar, then they would have retained him or pushed for a lot more in the trade.
There's playing, and there's "playing". If he's selected by default, because we're bereft of other options (as with most of his previous games), does that really count? If he comes in and dominates, demanding to be selected each week, then that's a different matter. If he's the 22nd player selected each week and never moves beyond the fringe, then he's just marking time until someone better comes along - and he might not be marking time for long if Milera & Doedee continue to develop at their current rate.Not talking about how good he, Lyons was, I was referring to player taking there opportunity and playing AFL football. Lyons was one of 6-7 players to do that in 2016 for the Crows
Go back to the start of this conversation, Its all about if CEY good enough he will play, Don't blame the coaches if he does not play.
There's playing, and there's "playing". If he's selected by default, because we're bereft of other options (as with most of his previous games), does that really count? If he comes in and dominates, demanding to be selected each week, then that's a different matter. If he's the 22nd player selected each week and never moves beyond the fringe, then he's just marking time until someone better comes along - and he might not be marking time for long if Milera & Doedee continue to develop at their current rate.
I'm wondering if CEY is even the first cab off the rank when it comes to our SANFL based midfielders? Is Wigg ahead of him? Wigg did get more votes in the SANFL B&F, so the coaches presumably were more impressed with his performances than CEY's. Wigg was named on the emergency list more often than CEY.
I still think the more likely option is Douglas moving back into the midfield, with Milera/Menzel filling the vacancy created at HFF.
I agree with you that he did. A lot of Norf fans were calling for his head and never rated him while he was there. Will be very interesting to see if he does get picked up.But he played 2 years of reasonably good footy at North, didn't he ?
Will be interesting to see if Dal Santo gets picked up ?
This isn't about what the players do with their opportunities, it's about how they get them and the role the coaches play in this regard. It's all well and good to say that if they're good enough they'll play when you're talking about players with enough talent to put the question of whether they'll make it at AFL level beyond doubt, but for those where it's not so obvious they may need a coach to take a chance on them. You highlighting the fact that one of our former reserves players grabbed an opportunity once it was finally given to him after years of solid football in the SANFL doesn't strengthen your argument, it weakens it, because it shows just how easy it is for a player's value to be overlooked. The league is littered with examples of players whose value went unrealised until circumstances gave them an opportunity. You need to accept that coaches make mistakes and sometimes it can mean the difference to a player's career, and it's frequently not a case of "if you're good enough you'll play".Well guess what, Lyons got a chance this year and he took it, He was good enough and did play. he was one of 6 plus players that did.
this isn't happening.Agree I believe a player has to earn the right, but just as important needs to hold his spot, Stats don't always show the work off the ball, I rate that work and how damaging they are when they get the ball.
This isn't about what the players do with their opportunities, it's about how they get them and the role the coaches play in this regard. It's all well and good to say that if they're good enough they'll play when you're talking about players with enough talent to put the question of whether they'll make it at AFL level beyond doubt, but for those where it's not so obvious they may need a coach to take a chance on them. You highlighting the fact that one of our former reserves players grabbed an opportunity once it was finally given to him after years of solid football in the SANFL doesn't strengthen your argument, it weakens it, because it shows just how easy it is for a player's value to be overlooked. The league is littered with examples of players whose value went unrealised until circumstances gave them an opportunity. You need to accept that coaches make mistakes and sometimes it can mean the difference to a player's career, and it's frequently not a case of "if you're good enough you'll play".
Popular fantasy, but probably not true.this isn't happening.
lets ask ourselves what would have happened to Thommo and Mackay this year had they been second or third year players...
answer: they would have been kicked to the curb.
you've massaged the stats well in your favour there, go and have a look at their votes per game.Popular fantasy, but probably not true.
Mackay polled B&F votes in 17 of the 19 games he played this year, including both finals.
Thompson polled in 20 of 22 games played, also including both finals.
Players do not get dropped if they start the season in the best 22 and continue to poll votes on a regular basis (i.e. the coaches are happy with their performances most of the time).